POWTermin8tor » 11 Dec 2016 7:21 pm » wrote:
You're almost certainly the worst lying shill for the Democrat on the board.![]()
These are two of the most astute minds on Economics and related policy.
Absolutely no chance she will.golfboy » 11 Dec 2016 5:02 pm » wrote: I just showed you that you were wrong. Now let's see if you're capable of admitting the truth.
I have ALWAYS put some blame on Bush, yet you continue to tell that blatant lie.Misty » 09 Dec 2016 8:56 pm » wrote:The majority of the bad loans were made between 2004 and 2006 when W was pushing his home ownership agenda really hard.
Yet you continue to absolve him of any blame, because you are a partisan hack.
And these kinds of majorities erase excuses.Obummerstinks » 14 Nov 2016 11:43 pm » wrote:Some numbers to consider:
306 - 232 POTUS
51 - 46....should end up 52 - 48. Regardless, already a Senate Majority
239 - 192...should end up 240 - 195. Regardless, already a House Majority
33 - 15...should end up 33 - 16 -1. Regardless, already a Governorship Majority
1 immediately to the Supreme Court - 5 - 4, another Majority - with a good chance for another two 7 - 2?
"Elections have consequences"
Lying sack of ****.Termin8tor » 11 Dec 2016 7:27 pm » wrote:
I have ALWAYS put some blame on Bush, yet you continue to tell that blatant lie.
You're a complete and utter lying hack.
Here's another, asswipe mcgee:Termin8tor » 11 Dec 2016 7:39 pm » wrote:
Oh my, Bush gave a speech! Two or three, even.![]()
Maybe you think the sun would rise in the West if he gave a speech recommending that, Dim.![]()
![]()
![]()
Here's actual evidence, psycho.
These are both under your NEW avatar, lying asswipe. Under the clemjob avatar, there are a hundred more, you pathetic habitual liar.Termin8tor » 09 Dec 2016 7:44 pm » wrote: Yes, the Democrat Party is to blame for the Financial Freeze,
The very instant a man wilfully lies, he's gone as far into the gutter as he can go - and deserves to be treated as the dick taker he is.Fuelman » 15 Nov 2016 10:43 am » wrote:
Sure, reject their opinion, then continue the conversation without going in the gutter. I can appreciate you seldom go there while others go there all the time.
I should slap the dick right out of your mouth, and starve you to death, sister.roadkill » 15 Nov 2016 11:43 am » wrote:
Make sure you say that to Misty also.
I'm as guilty as anyone for coarse language, but that's what I was met with on both sites when I first showed up.
Peace requires both sides, and our city streets show which side is NOT willing to move toward peace.
Damn, that was harsh!roadkill » 15 Nov 2016 11:54 am » wrote: Beside futz...since your meth-whore left you, you're just trying to get laid.
I don't recall you complaining when hillary "evolved."Misty » 15 Nov 2016 12:15 pm » wrote:What he said then:
What he says now:
Consistency apparently is not his strong suit.
Don't even TRY to bow up after I chased you all over this board trying to set up a fist fight, and all you would do is keep picking spots where rare fauna I'm allergic to are endemic.Huey » 15 Nov 2016 12:19 pm » wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
OoooooOh, he is telling me!!!'
I am so scared. Please let me have your safe place and safety pin.
I never said I was gentleman. I did say I treat others as they treat me. I got a long listing history to prove it. Unlike you ******, i don't create a new sock to hide behind when the going gets tough.
Somwant you gonna do Internet tough guy?
I knew chivalry was dead, but now I know the *** that killed it.Huey » 15 Nov 2016 12:24 pm » wrote: No, but you can send these pussies old documentaries on how people act in tough times.
Tell me tanker boy, why can't Misty break the cycle? Are you one of those who thinks woman are incapable of doing things for themselves? I am more than happy to give them equality. My posting record shows this. But with that equality comes the good and the bad.
Huey and goopti sittin' in a treeMisty » 15 Nov 2016 3:57 pm » wrote: I think he needs in-patient therapy for his obsession.
Hey Huey, why don't you tell Fuelman how often I respond to your posts?
I rarely answer you and you know it.
You and your BFF Golfboy are a couple of obsessive freaks.
Every time I logged on you two would tag team me and fire posts at me faster than I could reply to them.
You totally monopolized my time on this forum.
That is why I put you both on ignore well over a year ago.
Once in a while I respond to your posts if I feel like it or when I see what you've said (usually about me) when someone quotes you.
Somehow my name seems to come up an awful in your posts, and now you've taken to starting threads with my name in the title to get my attention.
You are a sad and pathetic little man.
They're **** with my soap manufacturing business.Misty » 02 Dec 2016 12:43 pm » wrote: More small government Conservatives at work.
This is horse ****.Misty » 04 Dec 2016 7:56 pm » wrote: If you mean the current president, he doesn't hold a candle to the future president when it comes to lying and spouting just plain ****.
That's a false equivalence.
Who Are The Ten Most Honest and Lying American Politicians?
Trump's Politifact Scorecard:
http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/
Trump tells so many lies that Politifact couldn't settle on just one as their Lie Of The Year.
2015 Lie of the Year: the campaign misstatements of Donald Trump
I wonder what Nike would pay to name the white house the Nike House?Misty » 09 Dec 2016 2:48 pm » wrote:
Of course, because just when you think it can't get any weirder, it does.
Our new POTUS and former reality show star, will now be producing a reality TV show while in office.
Donald Trump to Remain Executive Producer on ‘Celebrity Apprentice’
The creator of Celebrity Apprentice Mark Burnett met with Trump in New York this week, and a knowledgeable source said he is contributing to the Trump inauguration.
I hear he wants to show Trump taking off in his helicopter in NYC and landing at the capitol in DC, just like they did on Celebrity Apprentice.
Obama redux.Misty » 09 Dec 2016 7:13 pm » wrote:Candidate Trump campaigns against Wall Street.
Elected Trump puts Wall Street in charge of the American economy.
Classic bait and switch.
Let's hope so - but he's getting off to a slow start. The maralago incident just happened, did it not?Huey » 10 Dec 2016 8:27 am » wrote:Maybe he is going to atone for past sins.
Only a sick dog who lacks manhood entirely can ignore video proof of Bush rolling out the ACTUAL PROGRAM HE IS BLAMING ON DEMOCRATS.golfboy » 11 Dec 2016 5:02 pm » wrote: WHOA... are you actually claiming Bush made those loans, or was somehow responsible for them?
How many times bush SAID one thing has nothing to do with him DOING another, you nutless cretin.golfboy » 11 Dec 2016 5:02 pm » wrote: Yea, Bush was an idiot. But you're also ignoring the 17 TIMES Bush told Congress to do their jobs and regulate Wall Street.
Barney Frank was ONE DEMOCRAT in a repuke controlled government, you excuse making little nancy. Here, look - ACTUAL VIDEO PROOF THAT IT WASN'T BARNEY FRANK WHO ROLLED OUT THE PROGRAM THAT KILLED GRANNY, YOU DOPE SMOKING, STONED OUT HIPPY ****:golfboy » 11 Dec 2016 5:02 pm » wrote: You also ignore people like Barney Frank responding to those demands, by saying there was no housing bubble and he wanted to "roll the dice".
I just showed you that you were wrong. Now let's see if you're capable of admitting the truth.
Ironically, I'm already getting hacked at the twittering fool. Much like the Dems from the last 8 years should be eviscerated, these guys will get the same treatment should the results resemble their predecessors. All about results, and I don't care which set of DC sluts produce, providing the production is positive for the country. My faith in any of these douche' bags is severely lacking...Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 1:53 am » wrote:And these kinds of majorities erase excuses.
Can we have your word that if the republicans **** America AGAIN, this time you won't hold the democrats responsible for their failure?
It does.Obummerstinks » 12 Dec 2016 3:09 am » wrote:
Ironically, I'm already getting hacked at the twittering fool. Much like the Dems from the last 8 years should be eviscerated, these guys will get the same treatment should the results resemble their predecessors. All about results, and I don't care which set of DC sluts produce, providing the production is positive for the country. My faith in any of these douche' bags is severely lacking...
That should answer your question.