Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 2:18 am » wrote:Don't even TRY to bow up after I chased you all over this board trying to set up a fist fight, and all you would do is keep picking spots where rare fauna I'm allergic to are endemic.

I'll kick the **** out of you, any time, any place of YOUR choosing that doesn;t reactivate my colitis.

NAME THE PLACE!!!!

Let's have a beer instead and talk about what a great fight it would have been.

Huey » 12 Dec 2016 5:48 am » wrote:
Let's have a beer instead and talk about what a great fight it would have been.

We can paint ourselves in magnificent shades of greatness!

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 2:00 am » wrote: Lying sack of ****.

This is you, TODAY, blaming Clinton for the mortgage meltdown, partisan hack:

Hey Dim, that I place far more blame on Clinton and the Democrat Party does not absolve Bush for the far smaller blame he deserves.

Stupid lying, babbling Dim.

And only a hopeless Dim would claim that a few speeches by any president is more important than decades of law, regulation and political intimidation that Dems are responsible for.

How utterly freaking stupid.

Go ahead, tell your obvious lies.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 5:44 am » wrote:I HOPE you will agree with me that this video erases any purported warning or pleading to the congress along the lines of "Please don't force me to *** **** America."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYvtvcBKgIQ&t=15s

I have a beef with queefs who pretend that bush and the republican congress didn't do what bush and the republican congress did do.

Obama has given many speeches requesting legislation from Congress or other requests from his long, leftist wish-list.

Is that proof that he got them, Dim? Were those speeches responsible for much of anything in real life, let alone the worst financial crisis in 100 or so years?

How utterly freaking stupid to ignore decades of law, regulation and bullying of banks by Dems, but pretend a few speeches are truly to blame for the Financial Freeze.

That takes a deep dedication to ignorance and idiocy.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 6:09 am » wrote:

We can paint ourselves in magnificent shades of greatness!

I don't have to paint...I'm great naturally.


One of the many reasons Hillary and the leftist media lost...


"Fox Business’ Maria Bartiromo: Media ‘Had No Idea’ Where America Stood in 2016 Election"


http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/12/ ... -election/

roadkill » 10 Dec 2016 9:24 am » wrote:Misty...we have a shortage of progs here.
Could you please help?

What would you like me to do?
Clone myself?

Misty » 12 Dec 2016 3:23 pm » wrote: What would you like me to do?
Clone myself?

Why not? Half the liberals here are Sok Puppets anyway.
That's why they call come/go at the same time.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 1:53 am » wrote:We have *** like clem and clem-doppelganger roadkill blaming Clinton for the mortgage meltdown caused by this program and this program alone:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYvtvcBKgIQ&t=14s

I've posted that video so many times I've lost count.
He won't watch it.
He prefers to remain willfully ignorant of the fact that pushing home ownership was a cornerstone of W's administration.

Check it out.
When you Google 'George Bush home ownership' this is what you see right on top of the page.



The White House touting the expansion of home ownership as a record of achievement, and the NY Times showing how his drive for home ownership fueled the housing bubble.



https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives ... chap7.html



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/busin ... 53088.html

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 2:09 am » wrote:The very instant a man wilfully lies, he's gone as far into the gutter as he can go - and deserves to be treated as the dick taker he is.

Women, that's another matter. We expect them to take dick - we WANT them to take dick. The weaker sex has no idea whether the things they say are true or not - they're flighty. They should be treated with kid gloves, and not called out for the dirty whores they usually are.

It's called chivalry, people - get you some.

You have such a way with words.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 2:18 am » wrote:Don't even TRY to bow up after I chased you all over this board trying to set up a fist fight, and all you would do is keep picking spots where rare fauna I'm allergic to are endemic.

I'll kick the **** out of you, any time, any place of YOUR choosing that doesn't reactivate my colitis.

NAME THE PLACE!!!!

Now, now boys.
Play nice.
Don't make Momma get the wooden spoon.

Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 2:22 am » wrote:Huey and goopti sittin' in a tree
One eats poop and the other drinks pee;
First comes north, then comes south,
Then comes each in the other's mouth.
They're both rilly imachur.

Huey and I are all good now.
We worked it out.

Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 8:41 am » wrote: Hey Dim, that I place far more blame on Clinton and the Democrat Party does not absolve Bush for the far smaller blame he deserves.

The FAR SMALLER blame.



Always with the little qualifiers.
Some things never change.
**** weasel.

Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 8:41 am » wrote:And only a hopeless Dim would claim that a few speeches by any president is more important than decades of law, regulation and political intimidation that Dems are responsible for.

It wasn't just a few speeches you jackass. It was his policies.
And he could have changed the decades of laws anytime he wanted to.
He had a rubber stamp Congress for quite a while.
He did change the regulations.
He relaxed them.


Political intimidation?

A very NSFW photo series featuring quotes President-elect Donald Trump has said about women has gone viral on Tumblr this week.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/kassycho/signe ... .fxeNBevJP

Misty that was the name of my old cat before I **** it and it ran away, miss that cheeky bugger

Misty » 12 Dec 2016 3:49 pm » wrote:The FAR SMALLER blame.



Always with the little qualifiers.
Some things never change.
**** weasel.

What kind of utter hack bleats in outrage about qualifiers? A little Miss Marxist kind of hack.

As she refuses to accept that the Democrat Party deserves any blame at all.

Pathetic lying psychopath.

It wasn't just a few speeches you jackass. It was his policies.
And he could have changed the decades of laws anytime he wanted to.
He had a rubber stamp Congress for quite a while.
He did change the regulations.
He relaxed them.

Great source you have there; your word as a Democrat Talking Point Liar.

Say, how does a president change a law when Senate Democrats unanimously filibuster to prevent it, as conservatives how shown beyond doubt for many years now?

Give us a lesson in how legislation is passed or killed.

Misty » 12 Dec 2016 3:27 pm » wrote:I've posted that video so many times I've lost count.
He won't watch it.

Why should I? It's a freaking speech, not legislation or binding regulations. What, the country runs on a president's words?

Imbecile.

He prefers to remain willfully ignorant of the fact that pushing home ownership was a cornerstone of W's administration.

Hey liar, I have conceded for years now that Bush played a small role.

My valid point remains, these are liberal Democrat policies; Fannie Mae is primarily a liberal Democrat-run institution that gives almost all its contributions to liberal Democrats.

And most of the damaging changes in regulations were done under Democrat Clinton.

Who does lying political hack little Miss Marxist blame? Not liberal Democrats.

You're a literal psychopath.

Misty » 12 Dec 2016 3:49 pm » wrote:
The FAR SMALLER blame.



Always with the little qualifiers.
Some things never change.
**** weasel.

Democrat Talking Point Liars like you babble stupidly about qualifiers when you absolve Democrats of any blame.

I've never seen one single word from you that places any blame where it belongs; on Clinton and liberal Democrats, when it is unquestionable that the policies were passed originally by Democrats and are liberal policies Yes, to some degree Bush followed them, too.

Which makes you the complete and utter weasel.

When there is some problem, of course some people are more to blame than others. How freaking ridiculous that you babble idiotically about qualifiers.

Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 8:41 am » wrote:
Hey Dim, that I place far more blame on Clinton and the Democrat Party does...

...make you a partisan dick sucker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYvtvcBKgIQ&t=19s

Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 8:47 am » wrote: Obama has given many speeches requesting legislation from Congress or other requests from his long, leftist wish-list.

Name one, clown.

You're completely full of ****.

Name one - Go!

GO, GO, GO!!

GO!!!

Misty » 12 Dec 2016 3:27 pm » wrote: I've posted that video so many times I've lost count.
He won't watch it.
He prefers to remain willfully ignorant of the fact that pushing home ownership was a cornerstone of W's administration.

Check it out.
When you Google 'George Bush home ownership' this is what you see right on top of the page.



The White House touting the expansion of home ownership as a record of achievement, and the NY Times showing how his drive for home ownership fueled the housing bubble.



https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives ... chap7.html



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/busin ... 53088.html

But but but the Bubba made him do it!

He BEGGED the republican congress to change the law so he wouldn't have to crash the economy - but the minority party said no!

Which begs the question - why elect repukes if they lack the competence to govern as a MAJORITY?

Another question it begs is this: How did their alleged refusal for HIM and the REPUBS to crash the economy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYvtvcBKgIQ&t=21s