Gun control and a second stupid "stimulus" plan, the latter requested many times.Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 6:18 pm » wrote: Name one, clown.
You're completely full of ****.
Name one - Go!
GO, GO, GO!!
GO!!!
Well gosh, who should we believe, a babbling, lying psychotic or some of the country's most prestigious publications who have analyzed the issue, including the key NY Times reporter who covered it?Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2016 6:40 pm » wrote:But but but the Bubba made him do it!
Democrats whined for years that Repubs obstructed Obama's agenda, often by threatening the filibuster.He BEGGED the republican congress to change the law so he wouldn't have to crash the economy - but the minority party said no!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Which begs the question - why elect repukes if they lack the competence to govern as a MAJORITY?
I never claimed it did, but reform would have prevented or at least greatly reduced the problem.Another question it begs is this: How did their alleged refusal for HIM and the REPUBS to crash the economy?![]()
Trump dismisses the CIA's findings that Russia was behind the DNC hacking and his National Security advisor thinks that the CIA works for the Obama administration and helped Obama get reelected in 2012.Joe Scarborough warns Trump: CIA can cut your administration to shreds with leaks – and they will - VIDEO
The last thing that the president-elect should do is attack and ignore the intelligence agencies, according to “Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough.
The result will be an administration shredded “with leaks.”
The segment began with a New York Times article that revisits a 2015 interview from Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, President-elect Donald Trump’s new national security advisor.
“They’ve lost sight of who they actually work for,” Flynn said in the interview.
“They work for the American people.
They don’t work for the president of the United States.”
He continued, speaking of the CIA’s leadership: “Frankly, it’s become a very political organization.”
They also cited him in another 2015 interview in which he explained, “It’s all political with” the CIA leadership.
Flynn also claimed that the CIA was a pawn in helping President Obama’s reelection campaign.
“They’ve really been lying to the American public,” he said in the interview, referring to the Obama administration and much of the national security and intelligence establishment.
“The Department of Defense and those of us that have allowed this sort of a happy talk — ‘We’re moving in the right direction, things are working.’ It’s not.
The Taliban are going to come back into power, or ISIS is going to come back into power.”
Joe Scarborough anticipates an unprecedented investigation that will ultimately result from this.
“The CIA can cut the new administration to shreds every week with selective leaks, and they will if this relationship is not cleaned up.
And to have somebody as your national security advisor, who is accusing the C.I.A., who I said yesterday, is the organization that is on the tip of the spear in the fight against terrorism every day, accuse them of lying.
It’s just, it’s mind boggling.”
Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 4:05 pm » wrote:What kind of utter hack bleats in outrage about qualifiers? A little Miss Marxist kind of hack.
As she refuses to accept that the Democrat Party deserves any blame at all.
Yes you are.Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 4:05 pm » wrote:Pathetic lying psychopath.
Misty » 13 Dec 2016 1:38 pm » wrote: Trump dismisses the CIA's findings that Russia was behind the DNC hacking and his National Security advisor thinks that the CIA works for the Obama administration and helped Obama get reelected in 2012.
So if they don't trust the CIA who will they rely on for their intelligence?
It's a freaking speech where he outlines his policies jackass.Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 4:15 pm » wrote:Why should I? It's a freaking speech, not legislation or binding regulations. What, the country runs on a president's words?
Except he played way more than a small role, liar.Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 4:15 pm » wrote:Hey liar, I have conceded for years now that Bush played a small role.
The only valid point you have is the one on the top of your head.Termin8tor » 12 Dec 2016 4:15 pm » wrote:My valid point remains....
You make me stickie my threads...HeheMisty » 13 Dec 2016 1:51 pm » wrote: It's a freaking speech where he outlines his policies jackass.
Except he played way more than a small role, liar.
The only valid point you have is the one on the top of your head.
I'm not going to have this ridiculous argument with you any more.
It's as useful as repeatedly bashing my head into a brick wall.
Would not surprise me at all if Trump and Flynn relied on the KGB for their intelligence.NeoConvict » 13 Dec 2016 1:48 pm » wrote:NSA, FBI, and KGB have better track records than the CIA.
Erdoğan wants the U.S. to turn over a cleric that is living here in the Poconos, so he's using the arrest of Trump's business partner as leverage.Turkey arrests Donald Trump’s business partner to try to force U.S. to turn over dissident.
When Donald Trump first spoke with Turkish President Erdoğan in a congratulatory phone call after the election, Trump made a point of praising a top executive from the Doğan company.
The reason: the Doğan company is building Trump-branded towers in Turkey.
Trump appeared to be trying to convince Erdoğan to smooth the way for Doğan to build the tower.
But instead, Erdoğan had the executive arrested.
The exec in question doesn’t appear to have done anything wrong, but Erdoğan is nonetheless suddenly accusing him of being part of a failed coup which took place earlier this year.
Newsweeks's Kurt Eichenwald has connected the dots and concluded that Erdoğan is setting the stage to force Donald Trump to turn over Turkish cleric Fethullah Gulen, who is currently located in the United States.
The U.S. government does not believe that Gulen has done anything wrong, and that Erdoğan simply wants to punish him for being a political enemy.
"All?" What a complete and utter lie.Misty » 13 Dec 2016 1:43 pm » wrote:
[/size]Except I never said that they don't deserve any blame at all liar.
There's plenty of blame to go around, but you want to put it all on one party, and act like Bush was just some innocent bystander and not the POTUS for 8 years.
Yes you are.
Uh, hasn't your side condemned and distrusted the CIA every since the WMD thing?Misty » 13 Dec 2016 1:38 pm » wrote:Trump dismisses the CIA's findings that Russia was behind the DNC hacking and his National Security advisor thinks that the CIA works for the Obama administration and helped Obama get reelected in 2012.
So if they don't trust the CIA who will they rely on for their intelligence?
The kind of blatant dishonesty that you're infamous for.Misty » 13 Dec 2016 1:56 pm » wrote:Would not surprise me at all if Trump and Flynn relied on the KGB for their intelligence.
They are after all, Putin's useful idiots.
No, queer, your unbacked lie aren't worth it, ya linkless ****.Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:20 am » wrote:
Gun control and a second stupid "stimulus" plan, the latter requested many times.
There's two, psycho.
You'll evade and write more bulls*** in response.
You post like a brand new poster, you *** - not concept of links, no capacity to think.[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 15 Oct 2015 4:46 pm » wrote: Reality isn't determined by a link, Dim.
Republican congress, dicksucker.Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:27 am » wrote: I never claimed it did, but reform would have prevented or at least greatly reduced the problem.
lol...that was a classic clemjob rebuttalCannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 6:58 pm » wrote:Republican congress, dicksucker.
Republicans in charge of appointments, dicksucker.
Republicans did it, dick sucker.
Now, go suck another dick - mine is sore from you pestering me for more stick candy, you over eager cocksauce lover.
NO MORE COCKEN CANDY, piglet.
What does that have to do with a filibuster preventing Bush's 13 attempts at getting legislation?Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 6:58 pm » wrote: Republican congress, dicksucker.
Republicans in charge of appointments, dicksucker.
Gosh, you're just too brilliant for us ignorant conservatives.Republicans did it, dick sucker.
Now, go suck another dick - mine is sore from you pestering me for more stick candy, you over eager cocksauce lover.
NO MORE COCKEN CANDY, piglet.
Have another drink, moonbat.Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 6:49 pm » wrote:No, queer, your unbacked lie aren't worth it, ya linkless ****.
I know, queer - I know, I know. I'll save you the link, newbie.
You post like a brand new poster, you *** - not concept of links, no capacity to think.