Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:28 pm » wrote:
Have another drink, moonbat.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 8:34 pm » wrote:He pushed for and signed the montreal protocol to "protect the ozone," dick cheese. That's pretty huge - outlawing freon, right when it was going generic - which **** the people but hooked up dupont, *** cheeser.

He also granted amnesty to millions of immigrants who came here against our laws.

He also signed the drug enforcement bill which criminalized USERS, while his administration ASSISTED IMPORTERS. Indeed, during his term the CIA was CAUGHT bringing Medellin Cocaine into the country and teaching L.A. gangsters how to market it as CRACK in the black community.

He traded arms for hostages and violated the law against negotiating with turrists. He illegally armed the Mullahs in Iran. giving them missile technology with which they could reach Israel.

He cut and ran in Lebanon, after getting 300 Americans - most of them Marines - killed. He built al qaeda from the ground up, doofus - he had his photo taken with the Taliban and compared them to this nation's Founders, you spent pecker jacket.

He was also a gun grabber. He banned private ownership of full autos. He supported the so-called "assault" weapons" ban. Reagan was pro-brady bill. He signed the mulford act. He said all this ****:


WHY I'M FOR THE BRADY BILL - BY RON REAGAN

Suck off, tardo.

If a democrat did ANY of that you'd squeal like the pig your mama is, you pinheaded freak.

Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:28 pm » wrote:
What does that have to do with a filibuster preventing Bush's 13 attempts at getting legislation?

How do you get a bill passed if Dems threaten unanimously to filibuster it?

Babble away, Dim.


Gosh, you're just too brilliant for us ignorant conservatives.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 8:46 pm » wrote:No one made the republicans crash the market, asswipe.

They were in charge, asswipe.

They could have gotten any rule change they wanted, asswipe - they were not filibustered, asswipe.

Barney Frank relied on the kindness of the repukes for his chair, asswipe.

Bush rolled out the ACTUAL PROGRAM THAT CRASHED THE ECONOMY, asswipe.

Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:54 pm » wrote:
Blah, blah, blah, blah.

Even the reporter or the liberal NYTimes **** my mouth, Dim.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 8:34 pm » wrote:He pushed for and signed the montreal protocol to "protect the ozone," dick cheese. That's pretty huge - outlawing freon, right when it was going generic - which **** the people but hooked up dupont, *** cheeser.

He also granted amnesty to millions of immigrants who came here against our laws.

He also signed the drug enforcement bill which criminalized USERS, while his administration ASSISTED IMPORTERS. Indeed, during his term the CIA was CAUGHT bringing Medellin Cocaine into the country and teaching L.A. gangsters how to market it as CRACK in the black community.

He traded arms for hostages and violated the law against negotiating with turrists. He illegally armed the Mullahs in Iran. giving them missile technology with which they could reach Israel.

He cut and ran in Lebanon, after getting 300 Americans - most of them Marines - killed. He built al qaeda from the ground up, doofus - he had his photo taken with the Taliban and compared them to this nation's Founders, you spent pecker jacket.

He was also a gun grabber. He banned private ownership of full autos. He supported the so-called "assault" weapons" ban. Reagan was pro-brady bill. He signed the mulford act. He said all this ****:

WHY I'M FOR THE BRADY BILL - BY RON REAGAN

Suck off, tardo.

If a democrat did ANY of that you'd squeal like the pig your mama is, you pinheaded freak.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 8:55 pm » wrote:The usual Dim bulls***

http://dailysignal.com/2010/10/13/reaga ... -pictures/

Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:58 pm » wrote: I is needin dat dick now, boss!

Ooga Booga!

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 8:34 pm » wrote:He pushed for and signed the montreal protocol to "protect the ozone," dick cheese. That's pretty huge - outlawing freon, right when it was going generic - which **** the people but hooked up dupont, *** cheeser.

He also granted amnesty to millions of immigrants who came here against our laws.

He also signed the drug enforcement bill which criminalized USERS, while his administration ASSISTED IMPORTERS. Indeed, during his term the CIA was CAUGHT bringing Medellin Cocaine into the country and teaching L.A. gangsters how to market it as CRACK in the black community.

He traded arms for hostages and violated the law against negotiating with turrists. He illegally armed the Mullahs in Iran. giving them missile technology with which they could reach Israel.

He cut and ran in Lebanon, after getting 300 Americans - most of them Marines - killed. He built al qaeda from the ground up, doofus - he had his photo taken with the Taliban and compared them to this nation's Founders, you spent pecker jacket.

He was also a gun grabber. He banned private ownership of full autos. He supported the so-called "assault" weapons" ban. Reagan was pro-brady bill. He signed the mulford act. He said all this ****:


WHY I'M FOR THE BRADY BILL - BY RON REAGAN

Suck off, tardo.

If a democrat did ANY of that you'd squeal like the pig your mama is, you pinheaded freak.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 8:59 pm » wrote:the usual obscenities and BS.

Under Reagan, the economy improved the most, and under Carter most measures declined.


When President Carter took over from President Ford, the economy was growing rapidly after a severe recession, but inflation was very high. Carter then appointed the hapless G. William Miller as Fed Chairman, who managed to give us record inflation (13.3 percent CPI) in 1979. The Carter economic team flailed about, changing policies every few months, which resulted in a recession in 1980 and set the stage for a major recession in 1982, as the new Fed Chairman (appointed by Carter near the end of his term) Paul Volcker ratcheted down monetary growth to wring inflation out of the economy.
https://www.cato.org/publications/comme ... c-legacies

Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 9:07 pm » wrote:
Run for your life, Dim.

As utterly stupid as it sounds, the board psychotic claims that Carter out performed Reagan on the economy.

Yes, Carter did manage a few positive accomplishments, but overall he was a disaster.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 9:09 pm » wrote: Reagan was a very, very bad pResident for regular people. He pushed for and signed the montreal protocol to "protect the ozone." That **** the people out of generic Freon, but hooked up duponrt - very much in keeping with his agenda. Do you defend this?

He also granted amnesty to millions of immigrants who came here against our laws. Do you defend this?

He also signed the drug enforcement bill which criminalized USERS, while his administration ASSISTED IMPORTERS. Indeed, during his term the CIA was CAUGHT bringing Medellin Cocaine into the country and teaching L.A. gangsters how to market it as CRACK in the black community. Do you defend this?

He traded arms for hostages and violated the law against negotiating with turrists. He illegally armed the Mullahs in Iran. giving them missile technology with which they could reach Israel. Do you defend this?

He cut and ran in Lebanon, after getting 300 Americans killed - most of them Marines. He built al qaeda from the ground up - he had his photo taken with the Taliban and compared them to this nation's Founders. Do you defend this?

He was also a gun grabber. He banned private ownership of full autos. He supported the so-called "assault" weapons" ban. Reagan was pro-brady bill. He signed the mulford act.

WHY I'M FOR THE BRADY BILL - BY RON REAGAN

Do you defend this?

If a democrat did ANY of that you'd squeal like a pig. But you are ape-trained to eat reagan's **** off the sidewalk.

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 9:11 pm » wrote:Do you defend this?

Do you defend this?

Do you defend this?

Do you defend this?

Do you defend this?

Do you defend this?

Under Reagan, the economy improved the most, and under Carter most measures declined.


When President Carter took over from President Ford, the economy was growing rapidly after a severe recession, but inflation was very high. Carter then appointed the hapless G. William Miller as Fed Chairman, who managed to give us record inflation (13.3 percent CPI) in 1979. The Carter economic team flailed about, changing policies every few months, which resulted in a recession in 1980 and set the stage for a major recession in 1982, as the new Fed Chairman (appointed by Carter near the end of his term) Paul Volcker ratcheted down monetary growth to wring inflation out of the economy.
https://www.cato.org/publications/comme ... c-legacies

Cannonpointer » 13 Dec 2016 6:49 pm » wrote: You post like a brand new poster, you *** - not concept of links, no capacity to think.

Termin8tor » 14 Dec 2016 10:40 am » wrote:"No capacity to think."
That's really hilarious!

And when is the last time you linked to a credible source that supports your psychotic claim about Carter and the economy, psycho?

MilitantLiberal » 12 Dec 2016 4:03 pm » wrote:Misty that was the name of my old cat before I **** it and it ran away, miss that cheeky bugger

Termin8tor » 14 Dec 2016 10:40 am » wrote:
"No capacity to think."

That's really hilarious!

And when is the last time you linked to a credible source that supports your psychotic claim about Carter and the economy, psycho?

Termin8tor » 13 Dec 2016 8:28 pm » wrote: What does that have to do with a filibuster preventing Bush's 13 attempts at getting legislation?

Cannonpointer » 14 Dec 2016 11:27 am » wrote: Are you ever ashamed at what a bag of gas you are?

Is that why you fled and hid for months, clemmie - embarassed yourself one too many times?

Or are you proud of being a broken record with zero integrity, **** bird?

Have you ever mustered a pertinent response to a post in your life?

1.7 million people in 33 states and D.C. cast a ballot without voting in the presidential race

In every election, there are people who go to the polls to cast a ballot but who don't vote in every race. Usually, those "undervotes," as they're called, happen down-ballot, resulting in fewer votes for, say, county commissioner than, say, president of the United States.

But in every election there are also people who skip the presidential ballot for whatever reason. It happens.

With 2016 pitting two historically unpopular candidates against one another, we were curious about the extent to which undervoting occurred in the marquee contest this year.

We found some evidence that it was occurring a few weeks ago, but set out to tally the undervote more deliberately, pulling in data from every state to figure out how many people skipped the top of the ticket.

In only three states was the undervote percentage down. In states where it was up, it was up by an average of 2.5 times as much as in 2012.

Termin8tor » 14 Dec 2016 12:14 pm » wrote:I left A) because my desk top crashed and I lost my password

and B) because it's a waste of time to try to debate with psychotics, liars and clueless Dims. You fit all three.

I'll likely leave again soon.

Termin8tor » 14 Dec 2016 12:14 pm » wrote:But I had to come back to gloat over the pathetic shape the liberal-left is in.

Cannonpointer » 14 Dec 2016 11:27 am » wrote:Are you ever ashamed at what a bag of gas you are?
Is that why you fled and hid for months, clemmie - embarassed yourself one too many times?
Or are you proud of being a broken record with zero integrity, **** bird?

Misty » 14 Dec 2016 1:01 pm » wrote: Oh please don't go and deny me the chance to use all of my goofy images again, Puss.