Liberal Forum

Misty » 14 Dec 2016 4:32 pm » wrote:President-elect Donald Trump's newest pick to be a senior adviser in the White House has long ties to a prominent white nationalist, who sees him as an ally of the movement.

More psychotic lunacy from the moonbat left.

First, this is guilt by association, which liberals condemn, even as they engage in it..

Second, your moonbat left source dishonestly calls Peter Brimelow a "white nationalist."

That's a complete smear, at which you excel.

Huey » 14 Dec 2016 4:48 pm » wrote:Clinton knowingly did it.

Did Comey say that she knowingly shared classified info with people who were not cleared to have it, like foreign governments?

Flynn said that if he did one tenth of what she did, he'd be in jail.
I think it was more than a tenth.

And FYI he also installed a secret internet connection into his office at the Pentagon even though it was forbidden.
An internet connection implemented in secret like that would not have the same protections from hackers that a known connection would have.
You know, kind of like a private server.

Flynn routinely broke rules that he felt were 'stupid.'
So he's not exactly squeaky clean and is the last person who should be shouting, "lock her up."

Misty » 15 Dec 2016 10:37 am » wrote: Did Comey say that she knowingly shared classified info with people who were not cleared to have it, like foreign governments?

Flynn said that if he did one tenth of what she did, he'd be in jail.
I think it was more than a tenth.

And FYI he also installed a secret internet connection into his office at the Pentagon even though it was forbidden.
An internet connection implemented in secret like that would not have the same protections from hackers that a known connection would have.
You know, kind of like a private server.

Flynn routinely broke rules that he felt were 'stupid.'
So he's not exactly squeaky clean and is the last person who should be shouting, "lock her up."

Based on the contents of the story only I would agree with your last sentence.

Let's see if he lies about it.

Huey » 15 Dec 2016 10:46 am » wrote:Based on the contents of the story only I would agree with your last sentence.
Let's see if he lies about it.

It doesn't much matter.
He doesn't need Senate confirmation, so he's safe.
What bothers me even more about him is that he's a conspiracy theorist.
There seem to be quite a few of those around Putin's Pet who also subscribes to some wacky stuff himself.

Termin8tor » 14 Dec 2016 11:14 pm » wrote:The same Democrat Talking Point Liars who didn't see any wrongdoing when the Clinton's made $250 million dollars selling access and favors are suddenly deeply concerned about ethics.

Hold on to your hat Puss.
If you think that the Clintons were dirty, you ain't seen nothing yet.

You might want to study up on the Emoluments Clause.

http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#! ... nts-clause
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economis ... explains-2

I think somebody's having a meltdown.

Misty » 15 Dec 2016 11:52 am » wrote:I think somebody's having a meltdown.

Keith is an obsessed psycho and Trump made a fair point.

roadkill » 15 Dec 2016 11:58 am » wrote:Keith is an obsessed psycho and Trump made a fair point.

What fair point Goatse?
Did we not know in September that the Russians/Trump's BFF Putin were behind the hacking?
Did that not come up during the debates?
You know when Putin's Pet denied it and said that is was probably some 400 pound guy sitting on his bed?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the debates happened BEFORE the election, no?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XfVce4rELAY

Maybe we should get the Donald a safety pin.

Misty » 15 Dec 2016 12:23 pm » wrote:
What fair point Goatse?
Did we not know in October that the Russians/Trump's BFF Putin were behind the hacking?
Did that not come up during the debates?
You know when Putin's Pet denied it and said that is was probably some 400 pound guy sitting on his bed?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the debates happened BEFORE the election, no?

We know the dems SAID Russia and Trump were behind the hacking. The CIA supposedly claims it now.

There's just one problem...the CIA has not revealed any evidence to Congress...in fact they were scheduled to brief Congress and now they have cancelled that briefing.


It appears that Hillary's emails were leaked, not hacked. But the CIA won't come forward to confirm anything.

roadkill » 15 Dec 2016 12:32 pm » wrote:We know the dems SAID Russia and Trump were behind the hacking.

No Goatse, not the 'Dems.'
17 Intelligence agencies said so.
Remember HRC said it at the debate in Las Vegas?

Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking.

This is why Liberals are becoming more and more scarce here.
They're sick of dealing with people like you who create your own facts.



Fact check: The fiery final debate between Trump and Clinton

You got that Goatse?
Trump has been briefed on this stuff and he still continues to lie about it.
And his little Trumpkins lie right along with him.

What's going to happen when he gets briefed about an impending terrorist attack?
Will he just dismiss it?
That's assuming that he even takes the briefing.
He has told the intelligence agencies not to bother him unless there is something new.

Misty » 15 Dec 2016 1:32 pm » wrote: No Goatse, not the 'Dems.'
17 Intelligence agencies said so.
Remember HRC said it at the debate in Las Vegas?

Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking.

This is why Liberals are becoming more and more scarce here.
They're sick of dealing with people like you who create your own facts.



Fact check: The fiery final debate between Trump and Clinton

You got that Goatse?
Trump has been briefed on this stuff and he still continues to lie about it.
And his little Trumpkins lie right along with him.

What's going to happen when he gets briefed about an impending terrorist attack?
Will he just dismiss it?
That's assuming that he even takes the briefing.
He has told the intelligence agencies not to bother him unless there is something new.

Save us some time and list the 17 intel agencies that made this claim...and then briefed Congress on these claims. We'll be waiting. Then explain to us why the CIA cancelled the briefing on this matter to Congress.


"Intel chief can't back CIA claim Russia boosted Trump"



Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/intel-chief- ... tAtB7oP.99

Termin8tor » 14 Dec 2016 11:12 pm » wrote:
I guess that means you can't find a mainstream source that supports your utter stupidity about Carter then.

One babbling psychotic against reality!

Dascinating, your sudden interest in sources, boy toucher.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 15 Oct 2015 4:46 pm » wrote: Reality isn't determined by a link, Dim.

You're the one without his own opinions, ***. I don't need to cast about desperately - as you do - to find people whose views I can mischaracterize - as you do.

roadkill » 15 Dec 2016 12:32 pm » wrote:We know the dems SAID Russia and Trump were behind the hacking. The CIA supposedly claims it now.
There's just one problem...the CIA has not revealed any evidence to Congress...in fact they were scheduled to brief Congress and now they have cancelled that briefing.

Members of Congress were briefed by a group of U.S. intelligence officials as far back as August of 2015.

http://fortune.com/2016/08/11/congress- ... -dnc-hack/

And on October 7th of this year the Office Of The Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) & the Dept. of Homeland Security put out a joint statement on the hacking.

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ ... -statement

roadkill » 15 Dec 2016 12:32 pm » wrote:It appears that Hillary's emails were leaked, not hacked. But the CIA won't come forward to confirm anything.

Where did you get that **** from?

Nevermind. I see where you got it from.

roadkill » 15 Dec 2016 1:54 pm » wrote:"Intel chief can't back CIA claim Russia boosted Trump"

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/intel-chief- ... tAtB7oP.99

WorldNUTDaily.......

Don't embarrass yourself like that Goatse.

Cannonpointer » 15 Dec 2016 5:45 pm » wrote:
Dascinating, your sudden interest in sources, boy toucher.

Sudden, Dim? I've been citing them for years to back up my claims. You cite a stupidly misleading chart, and babble mindlessly.

You're the one without his own opinions, ***. I don't need to cast about desperately - as you do - to find people whose views I can mischaracterize - as you do.

Yet another Dim lie.

I have enough knowledge I can generally judge a column on an economic issue off the top of my head.

You're still in the freaking stone ages.

http://www.texasmonthly.com/burka-blog/522780/

Of course like most of what Putin's Pet says, that's not true.

Like I just said to my little friend Goatse in post #8456, on October 7th, 2016 the Office Of The Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) & the Dept. of Homeland Security (both part of the executive branch) put out a joint statement on the hacking, which reads in part:

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations.

The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts.

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ ... -statement

FollowJDH@FlufferFreeZone**** THRILLED BEYOND WORDS THAT SCALIA IS DEAD. He was **** DISGRACE on
@Scotus. He = DEAD **** WRONG on 2000 election + ALL ELSE.
4:32 PM - 13 Feb 2016
Retweets
likes

You were saying what now????????

Termin8tor » 15 Dec 2016 7:58 pm » wrote: Sudden, Dim? I've been citing them for years to back up my claims. You cite a stupidly misleading chart, and babble mindlessly.

THIS, Mush Mouth, is what YOU present as sources, you *** clown.

Termin8tor[/url][url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]» 06 Aug 2015 6:33 pm » wrote: Not even liberal pundits are so stupid as to claim

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 15 Oct 2015 3:50 pm » wrote: I'm recalling from memory, wackjob, and given that it was decades ago ...I'm likely correct.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 15 Jun 2015 9:16 am » wrote: I've for many, many, many years cited sources to back up my claims.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 15 Oct 2015 4:46 pm » wrote: Reality isn't determined by a link, Dim.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 04 Jun 2015 2:39 pm » wrote: Anyone with the slightest knowledge of history knows

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 23 Sep 2015 8:45 am » wrote: Anyone with eyes knows

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 12 May 2015 6:50 pm » wrote: Gosh, who should we believe, the babbling, lying psychotic?
Or the best minds on Economics and history?

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 13 Nov 2015 2:24 pm » wrote: Anyone who lived through that era or has read extensively about it knows

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 07 May 2015 10:54 am » wrote: Only a psychotic would deny

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 21 Oct 2015 9:06 am » wrote: No honest person would claim

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 13 Oct 2015 8:57 pm » wrote: I bring more sources to the board than perhaps anyone. I have proved almost every claim I've made.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 10 Oct 2015 5:34 pm » wrote: Anyone who's followed politics knows that.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 04 Nov 2015 10:48 am » wrote: Only a leftist liar would call a hugely successful developer like Trump a "nutjob."

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 07 May 2015 10:07 am » wrote: No one except a fringe leftist/and or psychotic would claim

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 05 Jan 2015 8:58 am » wrote: That's widely acknowledged by mainstream sources.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 03 Sep 2015 2:03 pm » wrote: I'll bet blind

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 18 Jul 2015 5:59 am » wrote: ...the moonbat who denies the widely accepted fact

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 18 Oct 2015 1:10 pm » wrote: from what I understand. Babbling psychotic imbecile.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 25 Sep 2014 10:52 am » wrote: ...admit obvious, widely accepted reality.

[url=http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=541870#p541870]Termin8tor[/url] » 27 Aug 2015 12:54 pm » wrote: Blah, blah, blah, the endless bleating of a lying psychotic.

And that's why you end up saying stupid **** like THIS, clown:

Cannonpointer » 15 Dec 2016 8:11 pm » wrote:

THIS, Mush Mouth, is what YOU present as sources, you *** clown.

It amazes me that someone will devote that much time to something so insignificant.

you really ain't got a lot going on, do ya?