Liberal Forum

Misty » 17 Dec 2016 3:21 pm » wrote:So about 5 days ago after wasting more than two years and spending $7.8 million dollars, Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy quietly shut down the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
The final report did not single out any wrongdoing by then secretary of state Hillary Clinton.

House Benghazi committee files final report and shuts down.

She told the huge lie to voters that the attack was caused by a video.


She did so to support Obama's huge campaign lie that terrorism was under control.

Is that wrong, Dim?

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 7:34 pm » wrote:She told the huge lie to voters that the attack was caused by a video.
She did so to support Obama's huge campaign lie that terrorism was under control.
Is that wrong, Dim?

Take that up with Trey Gowdy.
"The final report did not single out any wrongdoing by then secretary of state Hillary Clinton."

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 10:46 am » wrote: Take that up with Trey Gowdy
"The final report did not single out any wrongdoing by then secretary of state Hillary Clinton."

Did it deny that she lied, Dim? I'll bet not.

I'll bet they were referring to legal wrongdoing.

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:50 pm » wrote:When I referred to "reading," I was referring to the news, Dim, not the forum.

Maybe you forgot that you said that in reference to being able to read what I was posting on the forum, and not what was in the news. Can't keep your lies straight?

Misty » 16 Dec 2016 2:30 pm » wrote:How do you know that? You haven't been around.

Was there something in 'the news' about me not showing the slightest concern Puss?

Termin8tor » 18 Dec 2016 11:13 am » wrote:She told the huge lie to voters that the attack was caused by a video.

You gave up the moral authority to complain about politicians lying when you voted for the Liar-In-Chief.

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 11:15 am » wrote: Maybe you forgot that you said that in reference to being able to read what I was posting on the forum, and not what was in the news. Can't keep your lies straight?

Was there something in 'the news' about me not showing the slightest concern Puss?

Quote the entire post or stop wasting my time.

You bungle clear English so badly it's painful to watch, and you don't even read/ watch your own sources.

And you lie, lie, lie, lie, lie.......

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 11:42 am » wrote: You gave up the moral authority to complain about politicians lying when you voted for the Liar-In-Chief.

Bulls***. There are degrees of lying.


"Do I look fat in this dress?"

"I never said that."

Yes, Trump has told some lies, but absolutely nothing on the scale of lying that 1) the Benghazi attack on our Embassy started with a spontaneous demonstration caused by a video and B) terrorism was on largely defeated and the country far safer.

Those are Mount Everest sized lies, and Hillary and Obama have told many others.

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 3:26 pm » wrote:Here's your "charity," Dim.
It's a political slush fund that they can also use for their personal and professional benefit; first class travel, first class hotels, massive write offs of clothing, luggage etc. etc.

That old lie has been debunked so many times, I'm embarrassed for you that you repeated it.
I guess you have no idea how the foundation operates.

The Clinton Foundation is what's known as an operating foundation which means that it does most of its charitable work itself.

The amount of money it gives away as grants is only a small sliver of its activities.
They primarily use the donations to conduct direct charitable activities.

Their IRS tax form for 2014 showed that 87.2 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s expenses were on program services.

"The Clinton Foundation is an excellent charity," Charity Watch president Daniel Borochoff said Aug. 24, 2016, on CNN.

"They are able to get 88 percent of their spending to bona fide program services and their fundraising efficiency is really low.

It only costs them $2 to raise $100."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... ndation-c/

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 3:39 pm » wrote:You're a liar and a smear artist and always have been.

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 12:07 pm » wrote:That old lie has been debunked so many times, I'm embarrassed for you that you repeated it.
I guess you have no idea how the foundation operates.

The Clinton Foundation is what's known as an operating foundation which means that it does most of its charitable work itself.

The amount of money it gives away as grants is only a small sliver of its activities.
They primarily use the donations to conduct direct charitable activities.

Their IRS tax form for 2014 showed that 87.2 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s expenses were on program services.

Somewhat convincing, but FactCheck has been comically wrong before, and one charity rating group has ties to the Clinton Foundation, so I don't trust their objectivity.

And I've caught you lying more times than I can count, so I remain skeptical.

You've proven yourself to have zero integrity, but I'm sure you'll bleat in outrage that I don't believe you.

But even if that is correct, it doesn't undo the Clinton's corruption and crimes.

Clinton’s State Department: A RICO Enterprise
by ANDREW C. MCCARTHY October 29, 2016 4:00 AM @ANDREWCMCCARTHY Unlock Free Digital Access She appears to have used her official powers to do favors for major Clinton Foundation donors.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... foundation

This from just the last couple of pages.
Can someone please tell this moron that the Clintons are toast?

Termin8tor » 16 Dec 2016 2:22 pm » wrote:the Clintons

Termin8tor » 16 Dec 2016 2:38 pm » wrote:vast Clinton corruption

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:42 pm » wrote:the Clinton Foundation Slush Fund

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:46 pm » wrote: Clinton was collecting chits for payments to be made after he left office.

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:56 pm » wrote:still chump change compared to the Clinton corruption...

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 3:29 pm » wrote:vast Clinton corruption.....

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 12:19 pm » wrote:This from just the last couple of pages.
Can someone please tell this moron that the Clintons are toast?

.

Hillary Clinton was almost elected just weeks ago. Is that ancient history, Dim?

Yes, I am obsessed with preventing a deeply corrupt serial felon/ sociopathic liar from being US president.

You clearly don't care.

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:56 pm » wrote:The usual smears and propaganda from a con artist, you.
There are legitimate disagreements over work performed; sometimes you win and sometimes you lose.

And with Trump the people performing the work usually lose.

What about goods that were delivered Puss?
For instance......Trump orders $100,000 worth of pianos for his casino and the vendor delivers $100,000 worth of pianos, but then Trump decides that he's only going to pay him $70,000.

Let's hear your excuse for that Puss.
Maybe there were $30,000 worth of scratches on the pianos, right?

Actually the excuse Trump gave was that the casino was short of money.
And that's probably because he was pulling money out of it as fast as it came in.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/postever ... f6e59c3d55

Termin8tor » 17 Dec 2016 2:56 pm » wrote:Yes, he apparently did get caught using money from his foundation, still chump change compared to the Clinton corruption....

So you're putting a price tag on corruption?

Okay I'll play.
How about the millions of dollars he defrauded people out of with his phony university?
Even Trump wouldn't pay $25 million just to get rid of a nuisance lawsuit.

If you've read anything about that case you would know that it had real teeth and it was going to cost him a whole lot more if he lost, which was a very good probability.

His own so-called hand picked instructors, most of whom had no background in real estate, have said that their main job was to sell seminars and not to teach.

And BTW, the Trump University Staff included at least four felons, including staffers convicted of drug trafficking and child molestation.

http://nypost.com/2016/10/27/trump-univ ... -molester/

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 12:41 pm » wrote: And with Trump the people performing the work usually lose.

that's a lie.


You lie faster than anyone can keep up.

Termin8tor » 18 Dec 2016 12:31 pm » wrote:Hillary Clinton was almost elected just weeks ago. Is that ancient history, Dim?

But she wasn't. And neither one of them is ever going to hold elective office again.

Termin8tor » 18 Dec 2016 12:31 pm » wrote:Yes, I am obsessed with preventing a deeply corrupt serial felon/ sociopathic liar from being US president.

So why did you vote for one?

You are just using the Clintons as a deflection from the fact that Putin's Useful Idiot, who you voted for, is a lying criminal and a disgusting human being.

Termin8tor » 18 Dec 2016 12:44 pm » wrote:that's a lie.

When you said you read, that was a lie.
The internet is filled with stories from the people he cheated.
Read one.

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 1:02 pm » wrote: That's a lie.

When you said you read, that was a lie.[/quote]

You claimed "people usually lose."

That's a lie, and you have no source whatsoever to back it up, as usual.

You're a lying, smearing, propagandizing political hack.

The internet is filled with stories from the people he cheated.
Read one.

What, just because someone makes a complaint, they are correct? On what basis, Dim?

There are legitimate disagreements over work performed.

Misty » 18 Dec 2016 1:00 pm » wrote: But she wasn't. And neither one of them is ever going to hold elective office again.

The Clinton's deep corruption is very pertinent to why I voted for Trump, Dim.


And your years of shameless lies on behalf of them are absolutely relevant to refuting new lies and bulls*** you'll tell on the forum.

And here's the rest of my post that you cut out.


Yes, I am obsessed with preventing a deeply corrupt serial felon/ sociopathic liar from being US president.
You clearly don't care

Termin8tor » 18 Dec 2016 11:52 am » wrote:
Bulls***. There are degrees of lying.

"Do I look fat in this dress?"

"I never said that."

Yes, Trump has told some lies, but absolutely nothing on the scale of lying that 1) the Benghazi attack on our Embassy started with a spontaneous demonstration caused by a video and B) terrorism was on largely defeated and the country far safer.

Those are Mount Everest sized lies, and Hillary and Obama have told many others.

And let us not forget how she called the grieving family members of those left dead at Benghazi liars, the **** bitch she is.

This time tomorrow the only thing left is the inauguration.


Cry pussies cry

larryc12 » 18 Dec 2016 3:47 pm » wrote: And let us not forget how she called the grieving family members of those left dead at Benghazi liars, the **** bitch she is.

Good riddance to foul rubbish

..