Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:56 pm » wrote:Pretty comical coming from a psychopath.
Why did you call the highly respected John Fund a "child molester?"

Why do you mischaracterize every thing I say?
You know I didn't call him a child molester.
That dead horse has been beaten to a pulp.

Sorry Puss.
I'm not going to walk down memory lane with you.

If you'd like to discuss something that has happened recently let me know.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 1:04 pm » wrote:That's because there is no MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD jackass.

I ask AGAIN because you refuse to answer: How do you KNOW there was no fraud when it's illegal to challenge people's citizenship when they register, and vote?

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 4:02 pm » wrote: Why do you mischaracterize every thing I say?
You know I didn't call him a child molester.

You called him exactly that.

When I get my computer running, I'll quote you.

You can't tell the truth to save your pathetic psychopath life.

golfboy » 19 Dec 2016 4:06 pm » wrote: I ask AGAIN because you refuse to answer: How do you KNOW there was no fraud when it's illegal to challenge people's citizenship when they register, and vote?

Answer, she's lying.

That can be applied to almost anything she writes.

I need an exterminator.
This place is infested.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 3:51 pm » wrote: Never once do you ever prove that anything I've said is a lie.

Obviously, the highly respected John Fund isn't a child molester, as you accused him of being.


Point, set and match.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 4:09 pm » wrote:I need an exterminator.
This place is infested.

Yes, with psychopathic liars/ smear artists/ defenders of rapists and felons.

You despise us because we tell the truth about your heroes and your philosophy.

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 4:10 pm » wrote:Obviously, the highly respected John Fund isn't a child molester, as you accused him of being.
Point, set and match.

Except I never accused him of it and you know it.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 4:13 pm » wrote: Except I never accused him of it and you know it.

I musta missed that.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 4:13 pm » wrote: Except I never accused him of it and you know it.

Every bit as true as your claim you never denied that Bill Clinton is a rapist.

Which you did for years.


Psycho.

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 4:07 pm » wrote:You called him exactly that.
When I get my computer running, I'll quote you.

Don't bother.
I'll post what I said for you.

In 2008 someone on the old forum mentioned John Fund, and I remembered hearing something about a scandal involving him and the daughter of his girlfriend, but I didn't know any of the details, so I asked the question:



And for 8 over years this maniac has been accusing me of 'calling' John Fund a 'child molester.'

RichClem » 07 Feb 2012 2:04 pm » wrote:Yeah, sure, like you just innocently "asking" if John Fund was a child molester.

Note that I did not use the word 'child' in my question.
Once I researched the story I found out that Fund had a relationship with the adult daughter of his long time girlfriend, and I said as much on the forum.

But if you do a search of the word 'molester' in this thread, you will see pages and pages of Clem still accusing me of 'calling' John Fund a 'child molester.'
Unfortunately my thread at the old forum is gone, because it was filled with the same accusations.

RichClem » 13 Jan 2014 1:00 pm » wrote:You smeared him by alleging he "molested" his girlfriend's daughter.

RichClem » 11 Dec 2013 3:06 pm » wrote:You started by smearing Fund as a child molester and have done little except stonewall and lie since then.

RichClem » 10 Dec 2013 8:39 am » wrote:You tried to smear him as a child molester. You're a truly disgusting person for trying that.

RichClem » 02 Apr 2013 10:38 am » wrote:You smeared him as a child molester without even knowing the facts?

RichClem » 29 Mar 2013 10:21 am » wrote:What kind of sick person smears a decent man as a child "molester?"

It looks like Clem is now going to pick up right where he left off.

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 1:34 pm » wrote:Why did you smear John Fund rather than consider his extensive evidence?

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 1:44 pm » wrote:Why did you smear John Fund with ugly lies when I cited his extensive evidence?

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:26 pm » wrote:Why did you smear John Fund as a child molester when I cited his extensive evidence?

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:35 pm » wrote:Why did you smear him as a "child molester?"

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 3:56 pm » wrote:Why did you call the highly respected John Fund a "child molester?"

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 4:10 pm » wrote:Obviously, the highly respected John Fund isn't a child molester, as you accused him of being.

That is one sick puppy.

My only mistake was asking a question about something I wasn't sure about.
And he has been clubbing me over the head with it since 2008.

Misty » 30 Mar 2013 11:05 am » wrote:I had remembered hearing something about a scandal involving John Fund and the daughter of his ex-girlfriend, but I didn't know what it was all about, which is why I asked the question.



Since when is asking a question a smear?

Clem calls John Fund a man of high integrity.



That man of 'high integrity' had a secret sexual relationship with the mentally unstable daughter of his ex-girlfriend/long time friend.
(And forced her to have an abortion.)
She saw him as a father figure and went to visit him for guidance, and instead of offering her guidance he started a sexual relationship with her.

Of course Clem said that she (the 23 year old vixen) seduced poor innocent 50 year old John Fund.
So I guess it's okay to smear the woman.

golfboy » 19 Dec 2016 4:06 pm » wrote: I ask AGAIN because you refuse to answer: How do you KNOW there was no fraud when it's illegal to challenge people's citizenship when they register, and vote?

Still nothing... what a surprise.

Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 4:21 pm » wrote:Every bit as true as your claim you never denied that Bill Clinton is a rapist.
Which you did for years.
Psycho.

What I have said for years is that I don't think it's right to refer to someone as a 'rapist' if they have never been convicted of or charged with that crime.
But you continue to tell that same lie.

I wasn't in the room and neither were you, so I can't say for sure that he didn't rape her, and you can't say for sure that he did.

You also refer to him as a 'serial' rapist, so I'm curious as to who besides Juanita Broaddrick you think he raped?

You're even crazier than you were before, if that's possible.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 4:59 pm » wrote: What I have said for years is that I don't think it's right to refer to someone as a 'rapist' if they have never been convicted of or charged with that crime.
But you continue to tell that same lie.

I wasn't in the room and neither were you, so I can't say for sure that he didn't rape her, and you can't say for sure that he did.

You also refer to him as a 'serial' rapist, so I'm curious as to who besides Juanita Broaddrick you think he raped?

You're even crazier than you were before, if that's possible.

He was kicked out of Oxford for raping a girl there.

Eileen Wellstone, 19-year-old English woman who said Clinton sexually assaulted her after she met him at a pub near the Oxford where the future President was a student in 1969. A retired State Department employee, who asked not to be identified, confirmed that he spoke with the family of the girl and filed a report with his superiors. Clinton admitted having sex with the girl, but claimed it was consensual. The victim's family declined to pursue the case;

In 1972, a 22-year-old woman told campus police at Yale University that she was sexually assaulted by Clinton, a law student at the college. No charges were filed, but retired campus policemen contacted by Capitol Hill Blue confirmed the incident. The woman, tracked down by Capitol Hill Blue last week, confirmed the incident, but declined to discuss it further and would not give permission to use her name;

In 1974, a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then-law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference. She said he groped her and forced his hand inside her blouse. She complained to her faculty advisor who confronted Clinton, but Clinton claimed the student ''came on'' to him. The student left the school shortly after the incident. Reached at her home in Texas, the former student confirmed the incident, but declined to go on the record with her account. Several former students at the University have confirmed the incident in confidential interviews and said there were other reports of Clinton attempting to force himself on female students;

Broaddrick, a volunteer in Clinton's gubernatorial campaign, said he raped her in 1978. Mrs. Broaddrick suffered a bruised and torn lip, which she said she suffered when Clinton bit her during the rape;

From 1978-1980, during Clinton's first term as governor of Arkansas, state troopers assigned to protect the governor were aware of at least seven complaints from women who said Clinton forced, or attempted to force, himself on them sexually. One retired state trooper said in an interview that the common joke among those assigned to protect Clinton was "who's next?". One former state trooper said other troopers would often escort women to the governor's hotel room after political events, often more than one an evening;

Carolyn Moffet, a legal secretary in Little Rock in 1979, said she met then-governor Clinton at a political fundraiser and shortly thereafter received an invitation to meet the governor in his hotel room. "I was escorted there by a state trooper. When I went in, he was sitting on a couch, wearing only an undershirt. He pointed at his penis and told me to suck it. I told him I didn't even do that for my boyfriend and he got mad, grabbed my head and shoved it into his lap. I pulled away from him and ran out of the room."

Elizabeth Ward, the Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982, told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown. Last year, Ward, who is now married with the last name of Gracen (from her first marriage), told an interviewer she did have sex with Clinton but said it was consensual. Close friends of Ward, however, say she still maintains privately that Clinton forced himself on her.

Paula Corbin, an Arkansas state worker, filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after an encounter in a Little Rock hotel room where the then-governor exposed himself and demanded oral sex. Clinton settled the case with Jones recently with an $850,000 cash payment.

Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, DC, political fundraiser says Presidential candidate-to-be Clinton invited her to his hotel room during a political trip to the nation's capital in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She says she screamed loud enough for the Arkansas State Trooper stationed outside the hotel suite to bang on the door and ask if everything was all right, at which point Clinton released her and she fled the room. When she reported the incident to her boss, he advised her to keep her mouth shut if she wanted to keep working. Miss James has since married and left Washington. Reached at her home last week, the former Miss James said she later learned that other women suffered the same fate at Clinton's hands when he was in Washington during his Presidential run.

Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton's leased campaign plane in 1992, says Presidential candidate Clinton exposed himself to her, grabbed her breasts and made explicit remarks about oral sex. A video shot on board the plane by ABC News shows an obviously inebriated Clinton with his hand between another young flight attendant's legs. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.

Kathleen Willey, a White House volunteer, reported that Clinton grabbed her, fondled her breast and pressed her hand against his genitals during an Oval Office meeting in November, 1993. Willey, who told her story in a 60 Minutes interview, became a target of a White House-directed smear campaign after she went public.

DOES HE EVER STOP LYING?

President-elect Donald Trump touted his Electoral College victory Monday as a "historic electoral landslide" and a next step toward a brighter future.

"I thank the American people for their overwhelming vote to elect me as their next President of the United States," Trump said in a statement.

Though Trump bragged of historic margins, he trails Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by 2.8 million votes in the popular vote tally and The New York Times notes there have been 45 presidential elections in which the winning candidate won a larger share of the Electoral College vote.

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/311115 ... ge-victory

Trump’s Electoral College Victory Ranks 46th in 58 Elections

He won......end of story.

Might as well get used to it.

crimsongulf » 19 Dec 2016 7:04 pm » wrote:He won......end of story.

He didn't win a landslide.
Not even close.
So why does he keep telling that lie?

Do you enjoy being lied to?
It's kinda like he's calling his supporters stupid.

Misty » 19 Dec 2016 7:09 pm » wrote: He didn't win a landslide.
Not even close.
So why does he keep telling that lie?

Do you enjoy being lied to?
It's kinda like he's calling his supporters stupid.

That has nothing to do with it.he won period paragraph and by electoral votes, yeah it was a sound thumping and electoral votes are the only thing that count.

This election was a referendum on the dem failure of the last 8 years.

Majority of Americans Pessimistic or Uncertain About Trump Presidency

A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll finds 54 percent of adults saying that they are either uncertain (25 percent) or pessimistic and worried (29 percent) about how Trump will perform during his presidency, compared with 45 percent with either an optimistic and confident view (22 percent) or a satisfied and hopeful view (23 percent).

That's a significantly worse outlook than Americans expressed after the elections of both Barack Obama and George W. Bush.

A combined 66 percent were either optimistic or hopeful about Obama in January 2009, according to the same poll, while 59 percent were optimistic or hopeful about George W. Bush in January 2001.

Polls also said Billary was a sure bet


snicker