Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 429 430 431 432 433 1,190
User avatar
golfboy
20 Dec 2016 4:18 pm
User avatar
     
4,463 posts
Misty » 20 Dec 2016 4:12 pm » wrote:Are you calling a Wall Street Journal poll fake news?
I will. I watched the pre-election polling from NBC/WSJ and they were one of the worst.
"News" organizations should be prevented form performing their own polling. Their job is to REPORT news, not MAKE it, and that's what they were doing during this election.
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 4:23 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 9:56 pm » wrote:You're kidding, right? Here are your admitted words:

"Didn't John Fund molest his girlfriend's daughter?"

So you really want to defend yourself over a minor grammatical difference? Anyone reading that will assume Fund is a child molester.
Why do you ignore the fact that right after I said that, I looked into the story and found out that his girlfriend's daughter was an adult and I said so on the forum.
Yet you have continued to beat me over the head for 8 **** years, because I had the audacity to ask a question about something I wasn't sure about.

You are the one who continues to defend a man who bedded a young woman who was the daughter of his ex-girlfriend and still long time friend, and who saw him as a father figure.
You call a man that had sex with both a mother and her daughter a man of 'high integrity.'

I call such a man a piece of ****.
I'm not surprised because you also said that a man who emailed a woman on horse bestiality video to the people on his email list, was perfectly fit to be the governor of New York.

Image

You obviously have very low moral standards.

Image
User avatar
Termin8tor
20 Dec 2016 4:36 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 20 Dec 2016 4:23 pm » wrote:Why do you ignore the fact that right after I said that, I looked into the story and found out that his girlfriend's daughter was an adult and I said so on the forum.
Bulls***. You never on your own would have corrected anything. You would have let the smear stand.

You finally corrected it because I dropped a ton of evidence on your head and hounded you.
Yet you have continued to beat me over the head for 8 **** years, because I had the audacity to ask a question about something I wasn't sure about.
No one EVER should claim that anyone is a child molester on the basis of a snap internet search, psycho. No,"Oh gosh, I wasn't sure" bulls*** excuses.

You are a smear artist and a liar who spreads ugly lies about conservatives as you lie and stonewall for Democrat criminals, including serial rapist Bill Clinton.


That's your record year after year after year after year, so stop whining when I point it out.

Nor do I see any sign that you're any different today.
User avatar
Termin8tor
20 Dec 2016 4:39 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 20 Dec 2016 4:23 pm » wrote:You are the one who continues to defend a man who bedded a young woman who was the daughter of his ex-girlfriend and still long time friend, and who saw him as a father figure.
You call a man that had sex with both a mother and her daughter a man of 'high integrity.'
I was referring to his long career as a journalist.

A woman in her '30's seduced him, psycho. He didn't seek her out, and that was many years after he'd had an affair with her mother.

Are you seriously going to claim that she was incapable of making an adult decision?
User avatar
Termin8tor
20 Dec 2016 4:42 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 20 Dec 2016 4:23 pm » wrote:You are the one who continues to defend a man who bedded a young woman who was the daughter of his ex-girlfriend and still long time friend, and who saw him as a father figure.
You call a man that had sex with both a mother and her daughter a man of 'high integrity.'
I call such a man a piece of ****.
The woman was in her '30's by that time, long after the affair with her mother was over.

No, a man is not a "piece of s***" if someone that age seeks him out and seduces him. How utterly dishonest.

That a woman that age, W-O-M-A-N, is capable of making her own decisions, according to any feminist around.


Clearly feminism is dead, or more accurately, it gets dumped for reasons of convenience to smear a decent man.
User avatar
Termin8tor
20 Dec 2016 4:44 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 20 Dec 2016 4:06 pm » wrote: Can't defend the Liar-In-Chief, can you?

I'll defend him when it's appropriate and acknowledge his lies when it's not.

I'm pointing out your complete and utter lack of credibility, given that you've been a fawning, groveling, lying toad.y for far worse liars.
User avatar
golfboy
20 Dec 2016 4:45 pm
User avatar
     
4,463 posts
Termin8tor » 20 Dec 2016 4:42 pm » wrote: The woman was in her '30's by that time, long after the affair with her mother was over.
Please don't introduce facts into an emotional argument.
User avatar
Termin8tor
20 Dec 2016 4:56 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
golfboy » 20 Dec 2016 4:45 pm » wrote: Please don't introduce facts into an emotional argument.
Naah, it's not about emotion.


She smears anyone and everyone who gets in the way of her dishonest leftist agenda.

Present evidence, and the first thing she does is try to discredit or smear the source. That's the deeply ugly nature of the left.

Don't debate; destroy.

Shes a real wackjob. :blink:
User avatar
golfboy
20 Dec 2016 5:00 pm
User avatar
     
4,463 posts
Misty » 19 Dec 2016 12:07 pm » wrote:Is he absolutely right when he says that the murder rate is the highest it's been in 45 years?
When Trump began using this talking point, he was citing FBI data showing homicides were up 10.8 percent nationwide in 2015. That was the
biggest percentage jump in a single year since 1971.


Yep, 1971 + 45 = 2016
Looks like Trump was right.
User avatar
golfboy
20 Dec 2016 5:02 pm
User avatar
     
4,463 posts
Misty » 19 Dec 2016 12:47 pm » wrote: Where's the proof of all of this massive voter fraud Puss?

Bush's Justice Dept. tried for 5 years to prove it, and they came up empty.
I've asked you repeatedly how someone can prove voter fraud is occurring when liberals have passed laws making it ILLEGAL to challenge anyone's citizenship when they vote.
Why do you keep running away from this simple question, while continuing to claim no one is proving voter fraud?
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 7:37 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Drug firms poured 780M painkillers into WV amid rise of overdoses.

Follow the pills and you'll find the overdose deaths.

The trail of painkillers leads to West Virginia's southern coalfields, to places like Kermit, population 392.

There, out-of-state drug companies shipped nearly 9 million highly addictive — and potentially lethal — hydrocodone pills over two years to a single pharmacy in the Mingo County town.

Rural and poor, Mingo County has the fourth-highest prescription opioid death rate of any county in the United States.

The trail also weaves through Wyoming County, where shipments of OxyContin have doubled, and the county's overdose death rate leads the nation.

One mom-and-pop pharmacy in Oceana received 600 times as many oxycodone pills as the Rite Aid drugstore just eight blocks away.

In six years, drug wholesalers showered the state with 780 million hydrocodone and oxycodone pills, while 1,728 West Virginians fatally overdosed on those two painkillers, a Sunday Gazette-Mail investigation found.

The unfettered shipments amount to 433 pain pills for every man, woman and child in West Virginia.
[.......]
As the fatalities mounted — hydrocodone and oxycodone overdose deaths increased 67 percent in West Virginia between 2007 and 2012 — the drug shippers' CEOs collected salaries and bonuses in the tens of millions of dollars.

Their companies made billions.

Read more at link in title.
People are making money, and that's all that really matters.
User avatar
crimsongulf
20 Dec 2016 7:57 pm
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
It is the giving season and the meltdown of the left is the gift that just keeps on giving



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPIGzM6yMVs
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 8:15 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn Met With Leader Of Austrian Party Founded By Ex-Nazis At Trump Tower

President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming national security adviser met with the leader of a far-right Austrian political party founded by ex-Nazis at Trump Tower a few weeks ago, the New York Times reported Monday.

Heinz-Christian Strache wrote on his Facebook page that he had met with retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn in Trump Tower.

Strache also recently signed a so-called "cooperation agreement" with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s political party, which outlined plans for regular meetings and established cooperation on joint projects over five years, according to the Times.

Leaders of the Freedom Party have argued forcefully for lifting all sanctions against Russia.

Putin and the Nazis.
The Trump team keeps such good company.
User avatar
golfboy
20 Dec 2016 8:34 pm
User avatar
     
4,463 posts
Misty » 20 Dec 2016 8:15 pm » wrote:
Putin and the Nazis.
The Trump team keeps such good company.
The NY Times reporting on a facebook post.
This is what passes as liberal "journalism" these days.
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 8:52 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Sex, Lies, and the Tape: The John Fund Story

by John Connolly

Sept. 4, 2001 - When the stone thrower himself lives in a glass house, it is a matter of legitimate public interest.

John Fund, the forty-six year old writer on the staff of the Wall Street Journal's editorial page, has staked out a position as a man of integrity.

On his frequent appearances on cable and network talk shows, he espouses the position of the right-wing conservatives.

He is friends with people in the Bush White House.

He is a dear friend of Conservative Grover Norquist.

He recently met with Vice President Dick Cheney. During the Clinton presidency he wrote often of the terrible acts committed by Clinton against women.

On his appearances on Television evangelist Pat Robertson's 700 Club show, he often condemns those who do not live up to the highest moral standards.

This conservative pundit seems to be on television more often than I Love Lucy reruns.

Although he portrays himself as a voice of the religious right, the never-married Fund has cut a wide swath of sexual relationships throughout the Libertarian and Conservative parties.

He's a regular right-wing Lothario.

He is also a hypocrite.

There is nothing newsworthy about consensual sex between two unmarried adults, even if one of those supposed adults acts badly.

But, when a high profile public person stakes out the moral high ground, that person had better not be standing on quick sand.

A few months age, Morgan Pillsbury, a twenty-seven year old woman, contacted me with information about her former lover of three years, John Fund.

Although I had heard stories of Fund's less-than-cavalier treatment of women and particularly his Clintonesque treatment of one particular woman, I did not think that information worthy of a story.

Amusing gossip, yes -- newsworthy, no.

But the story Morgan told gave me pause.

If her allegations were true, Fund's relationship with her was not only bizarre; it was treacherous and bordered on the perverse.

To back up her story of the bad behavior of John Fund, she furnished me with a tape recording she made of a conversation she had with Fund.

The tape and conversations with Morgan's' mother, Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, and others confirmed Morgan's tale.

Twenty years ago, Melinda and John Fund both worked for the then fledgling Libertarian party in California.

Fund was the executive director of the local party in Sacramento. Melinda, who at the time was the mother of four children, began sexual relationship with the much younger Fund. Melinda said, "John and I had a sexual relationship for four or five years.

When he moved east, we remained friends.

It never really ended." Melinda, who is still active in the Libertarian party, went on to say, "Six or seven years ago, John called and during the conversation he told me, 'Melinda, if any of your children come east, have them look me up.'

I didn't realize that he was using me as a dating service!"

Last year Melinda learned that not only had Fund been sleeping with Morgan, he was the father of the child she would abort.

Not only had Fund violated his twenty-year-old friendship with Melinda Pillsbury-Foster, he, much like Congressman Gary Condit (Fund recently wrote a scathing indictment of Condit's behavior), insisted that Morgan keep their three-year-affair secret.

Morgan was 23 the first time the then-43-year-old Fund took her to bed.

Sounds all too familiar, doesn't it?

According to Morgan, John Fund was the third man she had been intimate with.

She had contacted him when she moved to the New York area after a bad breakup with her previous boyfriend.

Instead of receiving consolation from the man who had on occasion been her baby-sitter back in California, Fund took her to bed.

In 1999, confronted with an unplanned and apparently unwanted pregnancy, Fund abandoned Morgan and, without attempting to dissuade her, allowed the distraught young women to have an abortion without any support from him.

John Fund is a full time writer for the Wall Street Journal.

Yet, when I began researching a profile on Mr. Fund, he -- unlike most other journalists -- began a campaign to kill the story.

A source close to Fund told me a few days ago that Fund and a confederate were attempting to plant a false and malicious blind item about two people at Talk magazine.

They believed that the item would so frighten the victims that they would see to it that my profile of Mr. Fund was spiked.

Mr. Fund and his pals can congratulate themselves -- to protect innocent people from being attacked; I have pulled the piece from Talk magazine.

Hence this abbreviated piece which is written solely to introduce the reader to John Fund on tape with Morgan Pillsbury, the mother of the aborted child.

So that there should be no confusion, this tape was made legally and given to me by Morgan Pillsbury.

Ms. Pillsbury also gave me her permission to use her name, as did her mother Melinda Pillsbury-Foster.

I have learned that very recently Ms. Pillsbury, who has experienced some financial difficulties, has at Fund's request moved in with him.

John Fund lives in an apartment in Jersey City, just a stone's throw from the Holland Tunnel.

I have also been told that Mr. Fund, for whatever reason, has given Morgan cash and a new computer.

The following is a transcription of the tape of Morgan Pillsbury and John Fund.

Mr. Fund makes mention of how he is being threatened by Melinda.

He apparently believes that Melinda has no right to be angry for his deceiving her for three years, all the while sleeping with, and impregnation her oldest child.

For those who doubt the veracity of the transcript or wish to hear the anger and seething hostility of John Fund, Please listen to the audio tape.
John Fund beds the daughter of his ex-girlfriend, who is twenty years younger than him, makes her keep it a secret from her mother, gets her pregnant, forces her to have an abortion, then kicks her to the curb.

This is the man that Termin8tor aka RichClem calls a man of 'high integrity.'

Clem lies repeatedly about Morgan Pillsbury's age, insisting she was in her 30's when she was only 23 and says that she is the one who seduced poor innocent John Fund.
Termin8tor » 20 Dec 2016 4:39 pm » wrote:A woman in her '30's seduced him, psycho.
If you read the transcripts, you can see that he was very angry that Morgan told her mother about their relationship.

If it was all perfectly innocent like Terminator makes it out to be, then why would he be angry about that?
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 9:00 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cannonpointer » 20 Dec 2016 1:21 pm » wrote:Misty quotes the Constitution and the Economist - you respond with blather.
How typical.
Some things never change.

I guess he doesn't know that an “emolument” means compensation for labor or services.

I told him to study up on it, but I guess he prefers to remain uninformed.
:rofl:
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 9:07 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 20 Dec 2016 3:14 pm » wrote:It is not a "gift" for someone to stay at Trump's hotel or pay for a good or service.

Read the actual words in the Constitution.

Stupid Dim.
The actual words in the Constitution say: “No person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign state.”

Now read the actual definition of the word 'emolument' Puss.

Image
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 9:19 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 19 Dec 2016 9:59 pm » wrote: Save your legalistic bulls*** for the moonbats, psycho.
I quoted the dictionary definition, and a "rapist" to anyone with common sense or a dictionary is someone who has committed rape.
So you're saying that he committed rape based solely on an allegation, because I'm assuming you were not a witness to this rape.

By that logic, I guess it's okay for me to call Donald Trump a rapist, as there is a woman has accused him of raping her when she was 13.
And she has two witnesses.

I guess I could also call him a pedophile, right?
After all, she was underage.

And she says this happened more than once at parties thrown by Trump's good friend, convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
“I’ve known Jeff (Epstein) for 15 years,” Trump told New York Magazine in 2002.

Calling him a “terrific guy,” Trump continued, “He’s a lot of fun to be with.

It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.

No doubt about it—Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
User avatar
crimsongulf
20 Dec 2016 9:26 pm
User avatar
        
1,685 posts
90% of all of the Trump whining is based simply on allegations but seems to be no problem with that
User avatar
Nobody
20 Dec 2016 9:30 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 20 Dec 2016 4:39 pm » wrote:A woman in her '30's seduced him, psycho.

He didn't seek her out, and that was many years after he'd had an affair with her mother.
She was 23 and I don't care if it was 100 years after he had dated her mother.

Once you have had a sexual relationship with the mother, the daughter is off limits, period.

She was 23 and had only been with three other men.
He was 43 and a lecher, but I'm sure she seduced him........psycho.

On what do you base your claim that she seduced him Puss?
This should be funny.
1 429 430 431 432 433 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 5688 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 5661 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, proximic, YandexBot, Bolt, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, Baiduspider, bingbot, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search