Liberal Forum

Misty » 02 Jan 2017 2:12 pm » wrote: People like Larry, Golfboy and Clem can't defend their own vote

I voted for Ted Cruz. What would you like from me in defense of that vote?

so they continue to attack anyone that they think voted for Hillary.

Poor thing. Truth is, I never attacked you for voting for her, something you surely know unless you want to blather nonsense hoping someone will believe it (not surprising). I attacked you for **** defending all her **** that harmed and continues to harm this country, and all that was BEFORE the election, liar.

They put a racist, sexual abuser, con-artist/fraud into office and they think that makes them better than anyone who didn't vote for him.

I didn't vote for him, but I'm still waiting for you to show me what he has said/done/intimated that he is a racist. Oh, btw, you didn't give a **** about a certain POTUS abusing women sexually and physically, but defended him the same as you did the whore.

Misty » 02 Jan 2017 2:12 pm » wrote: People like Larry, Golfboy and Clem can't defend their own vote, so they continue to attack anyone that they think voted for Hillary.

"Can't defend my vote?" Liar.

I've written in considerable detail about how Trump might well be a better president than Reagan.

Misty » 02 Jan 2017 2:14 pm » wrote: You defended a racist, serial liar, con artist and fraud, not to mention a sexual abuser.
And that makes you better than me how?

I did no such **** thing, you liar! Never once in that whole pre-election did I defend the man.

Oh, I know.
You didn't defend him.

Your sarcastic laughter is a lie.

Who'd ya vote for Larry?

I've told you twice now whom I voted for, liar.

Misty » 02 Jan 2017 2:12 pm » wrote:
They put a racist, sexual abuser, con-artist/fraud into office and they think that makes them better than anyone who didn't vote for him.

I'll tell you exactly what makes me better than you. I don't make accusations to make them like you do. You simply refuse to back your accusation of Trump being a racist, so saying so is good enough for a liar like you. It's the way of the left. Trump is a lot of things that are ****, but I have yet to see where this accusation of racism has legs. I am sick and tired of you leftists constantly accusing racism of your opposition and you're not going to just get a free pass when you do that. Put up or shut up, eh?

Trump: I know things about this supposed Russian hacking that others don’t, and you’ll find out Tuesday or Wednesay

Has anybody heard anything from Trump yesterday or today about what he knows?
Anybody?

Is that the same Julian Assange that Trump called for the death penalty for in 2010?



http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/ ... index.html

larryc12 » 04 Jan 2017 8:08 am » wrote:I'll tell you exactly what makes me better than you. I don't make accusations to make them like you do. You simply refuse to back your accusation of Trump being a racist, so saying so is good enough for a liar like you. It's the way of the left. Trump is a lot of things that are ****, but I have yet to see where this accusation of racism has legs. I am sick and tired of you leftists constantly accusing racism of your opposition and you're not going to just get a free pass when you do that. Put up or shut up, eh?

I can prove that Trump is a racist with one word.
Birther.

Termin8tor » 03 Jan 2017 11:36 am » wrote:"Can't defend my vote?" Liar.
I've written in considerable detail about how Trump might well be a better president than Reagan.

Yeah, and I might well be a better opera singer than Maria Callas.

larryc12 » 03 Jan 2017 8:48 am » wrote: I voted for Ted Cruz. What would you like from me in defense of that vote?

He was not running in the general election.
Did you write him in?
What state might that be?

Gotta give ya credit Marlo, you haven't tucked and run like the rest of the blue side.

crimsongulf » 04 Jan 2017 8:51 pm » wrote:Gotta give ya credit Marlo, you haven't tucked and run like the rest of the blue side.

I'm not spending that much time here lately either.
No sense arguing about this **** any more, especially when the people you are arguing with have their own set of facts.

I'm just gonna sit back, eat popcorn and watch the cluster **** that is about to happen.
Whenever the Repubs get some power, they always end up overreaching.

I did enjoy how Trump scolded them on Twitter about the ethics thing.

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 9:01 pm » wrote: I'm not spending that much time here lately either.
No sense arguing about this **** any more, especially when the people you are arguing with have their own set of facts.

I'm just gonna sit back, eat popcorn and watch the cluster **** that is about to happen.
Whenever the Repubs get some power, they always end up overreaching.

I did enjoy how Trump scolded them on Twitter about the ethics thing.

I did the same when soetoro got in and boy was it ever a ****.

My beer and popcorn is going to be the never ending snowflake meltdown as all of soetoros pen and phone XO's get kicked to the curb.

Even better is when /reid gets his *** humiliated for bringing in the nuclear option.

Karma is a bitch.

crimsongulf » 04 Jan 2017 9:20 pm » wrote:I did the same when soetoro got in and boy was it ever a ****.
My beer and popcorn is going to be the never ending snowflake meltdown as all of soetoros pen and phone XO's get kicked to the curb.
Even better is when /reid gets his *** humiliated for bringing in the nuclear option.
Karma is a bitch.

The nuclear option only applies to federal judicial nominees (not including SCOTUS) and executive-office appointments.
He had to do it, since the only word the Repubs seemed to know was NO.

I had to laugh at Mitch McConnell today whining about how it wouldn't be right for the Dems to block a SCOTUS nominee after he stole that open seat on the court from Obama.
**** hypocrite.

They'd better get to work on the 'replace' part of the 'repeal and replace' Obamacare promise.
Trump promised to replace it with 'something terrific.'
Paul Ryan looked like he didn't have a clue what that might be today.

Trump looks like he's too busy giving Putin tongue baths to be bothered with it.

Murderers and convicted felons/mobsters.
This guy hangs with a great crowd.

Donald Trump appears alongside convicted felon with mobster ties at New Year's Eve party

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 10:18 pm » wrote: The nuclear option only applies to federal judicial nominees (not including SCOTUS) and executive-office appointments.
He had to do it, since the only word the Repubs seemed to know was NO.

I had to laugh at Mitch McConnell today whining about how it wouldn't be right for the Dems to block a SCOTUS nominee after he stole that open seat on the court from Obama.
**** hypocrite.

They'd better get to work on the 'replace' part of the 'repeal and replace' Obamacare promise.
Trump promised to replace it with 'something terrific.'
Paul Ryan looked like he didn't have a clue what that might be today.

Trump looks like he's too busy giving Putin tongue baths to be bothered with it.

Poor Misty.... Dims are irrelevant. If they try to block a SCOTUS appointment, the Republicans will simply play the Harry Reid card and go nuclear.
And there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 9:01 pm » wrote: I'm not spending that much time here lately either.
No sense arguing about this **** any more, especially when the people you are arguing with have their own set of facts.

I'm just gonna sit back, eat popcorn and watch the cluster **** that is about to happen.
Whenever the Repubs get some power, they always end up overreaching.

I did enjoy how Trump scolded them on Twitter about the ethics thing.

I don't blame you, were I you, I'd run away too.

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 8:50 pm » wrote: He was not running in the general election.
Did you write him in?

Yes, and I told you that right after the election.


I don't know what you mean by what state.

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 8:35 pm » wrote: I can prove that Trump is a racist with one word.
Birther.

"Birther" does not make someone a racist, for Christ's sake. That's just the left's stupid + dishonest conclusion and you buy it. So no, you have no proof whatsoever.

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 10:18 pm » wrote: The nuclear option only applies to federal judicial nominees (not including SCOTUS) and executive-office appointments.
He had to do it, since the only word the Repubs seemed to know was NO.

Speaking of having "one's own facts."

Every time Obama proposed a good policy, Repubs passed it immediately. It's not their fault he's such an incompetent leftist.
They quickly approved almost all of his appointees and just judicial appointees.

But late in his second term given his repeated violations of the Constitution and his leftist appointees, they are not obligated in the slightest to approve his last SCOTUS nominee.

I had to laugh at Mitch McConnell today whining about how it wouldn't be right for the Dems to block a SCOTUS nominee after he stole that open seat on the court from Obama.
**** hypocrite.

The latest Democrat Talking Point Lie; Repubs "stole" Obama's last SCOTUS seat.

They didn't do anything different than Dems have, done or threatened to, liar.

Fox played quotes of Dems promising just that when Bush was president.

Misty » 04 Jan 2017 8:47 pm » wrote: Yeah, and I might well be a better opera singer than Maria Callas.

Lie and run. Lie and run.

Your daily Modus Operandi.

I've defended Trump in considerable detail.