Flying Monkeys
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
7 Jan 2017 2:55 pm
Exactly what they said about Reagan.Misty » 07 Jan 2017 2:51 pm » wrote:That was a 'private' meeting with only Republicans and that came from Rep. Mark Sanford (R) of South Carolina.
Sanford also said that Trump has a 'callous disregard for details' and he said that what Trump said at the meeting was the 'long on hyperbole and short on facts.'
How did his presidency turn out, Dim?
A spectacular success.
7 Jan 2017 2:57 pm
Misty » 07 Jan 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: There isn't a criminal with an R after their name that you have not defended and will now continue to defend, so I wouldn't talk.
Liar.
7 Jan 2017 2:58 pm
Which Republicans said that about Reagan you liar?Termin8tor » 07 Jan 2017 2:55 pm » wrote:Exactly what they said about Reagan.
How did his presidency turn out, Dim?
A spectacular success.
7 Jan 2017 2:59 pm
Go ahead. There's no end to your bulls***,lies and propaganda, so I could care less.Misty » 07 Jan 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: BTW, Trump has also been accused of rape and the alleged victim was 13.
So from now on I will call him a rapist and a pedophile.
Will you be okay with that Puss?
Or are you going to whine like a little bitch when I do it?
I pick number two.
What kind of psychopath would accuse a decent man of being a child molester, as you did to John Fund?
A little Miss Marxist kind of psychopath.
7 Jan 2017 3:01 pm
Lots of people including conservatives were highly critical of Reagan's attention to detail; George Will for one.Misty » 07 Jan 2017 2:58 pm » wrote: Which Republicans said that about Reagan you liar?
Liberals like you even more, with your endless lies and propaganda.
How did Reagan's presidency turn out?
7 Jan 2017 3:07 pm
7 Jan 2017 3:10 pm
So you're not defending a man who was found guilty of housing discrimination, ran a phony university and a phony charity and bragged about his right to sexually assault women?Termin8tor » 07 Jan 2017 2:57 pm » wrote: Liar.
You do know that he was fined 1 million dollars for violating NY State education laws, and not only was his foundation not registered as a charity, but he admitted to the IRS that he violated self-dealing rules and was forced to pay penalties for it.
But you won't defend that, will you?
What about the millions that he scammed from people who could least afford it with his Trump U. scam?
You won't defend that, will you?
And what about all of the people who say he cheated them out of money he owed them?
You won't defend that, will you?
Nah. Not you.
7 Jan 2017 3:13 pm
Oh gosh, that's clever. Make lots of unfounded or even false accusations against Trump, then claim that I defended him if I disagree with any.Misty » 07 Jan 2017 3:10 pm » wrote:
So you're not defending a man who was found guilty of housing discrimination, ran a phony university and a phony charity and bragged about his right to sexually assault women?
You do know that he was fined 1 million dollars for violating NY State education laws, and not only was his foundation not registered as a charity, but he admitted to the IRS that he violated self-dealing rules and was forced to pay penalties for it.
But you won't defend that, will you?
What about the millions that he scammed from people who could least afford it with his Trump U. scam?
You won't defend that, will you?
And what about all of the people who say he cheated them out of money he owed them?
You won't defend that, will you?
Nah. Not you.
Psychopath.
7 Jan 2017 3:15 pm
Why did you dodge my question, psycho?Misty » 07 Jan 2017 3:10 pm » wrote: So you're not ....
How did Reagan's presidency turn out?
8 Jan 2017 11:10 am
Seems like Senate Republicans are more than willing to break the rules for Putin's Pet.Ethics Office Warns Confirmations For Trump Nominees Are Moving Too Fast
The Office of Government Ethics is raising alarm over the pace of confirmation hearings for President-elect Donald Trump's nominees, saying Saturday that they have yet to receive required financial disclosures for some picks set to come before Congress next week.
In a letter to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., released Saturday, OGE Director Walter Shaub wrote that "the announced hearing schedule for several nominees who have not completed the ethics review process is of great concern to me" and that the current schedule "has created undue pressure on OGE's staff and agency ethics officials to rush through these important reviews.
"More significantly, it has left some of the nominees with potentially unknown or unresolved ethics issues shortly before their scheduled hearings," Shaub continued.
"I am not aware of any occasion in the four decades since OGE was established when the Senate held a confirmation hearing before the nominee had completed the ethics review process."
Many of his appointees have never worked in government before so they have never been vetted.
They could have all kinds of conflicts of interest, but since they haven't bothered to fill out their financial disclosures, we won't ever know.
The Republicans are going to ram through a bunch of these unvetted nominees this week.
This coupled with their recent efforts to destroy the Office of Congressional Ethics proves that they don't give a **** about ethics, unless it concerns a Democrat.
8 Jan 2017 11:19 am
You're the one dodging Puss.Termin8tor » 07 Jan 2017 3:15 pm » wrote:Why did you dodge my question, psycho?
How did Reagan's presidency turn out?
You keep on wanting to talk about the past in order to deflect from the present.
What does Reagan's presidency have to do with the current president elect?
Nothing.
But you can't defend the piece of ****, who you know is unfit for the office, so you keep trying to change the subject.
You're as transparent as a pane of glass.
8 Jan 2017 11:24 am
Not one of the things I said is unfounded or false you filthy liar.Termin8tor » 07 Jan 2017 3:13 pm » wrote:Oh gosh, that's clever. Make lots of unfounded or even false accusations against Trump, then claim that I defended him if I disagree with any.
Psychopath.
8 Jan 2017 1:13 pm
Liar. Aside from starting threads about Trump and "the present," I've answered many of your questions.Misty » 08 Jan 2017 11:19 am » wrote: You're the one dodging Puss.
You keep on wanting to talk about the past in order to deflect from the present.
You've stonewalled all of mine, like you have year after year after year after year..
Psycho.
8 Jan 2017 1:14 pm
"Putin's pet", you filthy liar.Misty » 08 Jan 2017 11:24 am » wrote: Not one of the things I said is unfounded or false you filthy liar.
Now you'll dodge my point to make more false or unfounded allegations in your endless Propaganda/ Disinformation War.
8 Jan 2017 1:22 pm
Misty » 07 Jan 2017 2:58 pm » wrote: Which Republicans said that about Reagan you liar?
I quoted one who did, so who's lying?
Little Miss Marxist, as usual.
8 Jan 2017 6:51 pm
That's right Puss.Termin8tor » 08 Jan 2017 1:14 pm » wrote: "Putin's pet", you filthy liar.
You can't deny the obvious.
He is taking the side of Putin above our own Intelligence Agencies and against many people in his own party.
8 Jan 2017 6:53 pm
You quoted one two posts after I wrote that you idiot.Termin8tor » 08 Jan 2017 1:22 pm » wrote: I quoted one who did, so who's lying?
Little Miss Marxist, as usual.
Check the time stamp.
I can't predict the future you jackass.
Termin8tor » 07 Jan 2017 2:55 pm » wrote:Exactly what they said about Reagan.
How did his presidency turn out, Dim?
A spectacular success.
Misty » 07 Jan 2017 2:58 pm » wrote:Which Republicans said that about Reagan you liar?
Termin8tor » 07 Jan 2017 3:01 pm » wrote:Lots of people including conservatives were highly critical of Reagan's attention to detail; George Will for one.
8 Jan 2017 6:56 pm
We don't need no stinkin' background checks.
Nothing to see here.
Move along folks.Incoming White House chief of staff Reince Priebus said Sunday there's “no reason” to delay confirmation hearings for President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet nominees until their background checks are complete.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... arings-for
Nothing to see here.
8 Jan 2017 7:01 pm
What's obvious is that you're a "filthy liar."
What has become obvious is that US intelligence has become often untrustworthy, dishonest even, under Obama, whose administration was behind much of that dishonesty.He is taking the side of Putin above our own Intelligence Agencies and against many people in his own party.
The former head of the House Intelligence Committee said that only 3 of the 17 US intelligence agencies support this apparently exaggerated anti-Trump campaign.
There were lies about Obama winning the War on Terror to advance Obama's re-election, and the head of the CIA lied to Congress that a video sparked the Benghazi attack.
As Trump said, its' time to drain the swamp.
8 Jan 2017 8:47 pm
No, what's obvious is that you are perfectly willing to carry water for someone that you know is not qualified for the office he is about to assume.Termin8tor » 08 Jan 2017 7:01 pm » wrote:What has become obvious is that US intelligence has become often untrustworthy, dishonest even, under Obama, whose administration was behind much of that dishonesty.
Many of the people in our intelligence agencies are non-political career employees, who he is going to have to trust when he takes office, so why is he throwing them under the bus to support Putin?
He's not draining it, he's filling it with alligators.Termin8tor » 08 Jan 2017 7:01 pm » wrote:As Trump said, its' time to drain the swamp.
And don't forget what Putin's Pet also said: Grab 'Em By The ******!
Who is online
In total there are 4211 users online :: 14 registered, 17 bots, and 4180 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, michaelf, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Lisa 558, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, MicroMessenger, Not, okhttp, NING, YandexBot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, ADmantX, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7, Baiduspider, bingbot