Liberal Forum

larryc12 » 10 Jan 2017 8:23 am » wrote:Was Obama lying when he was in favor of one man, one woman marriage, or is he lying now? I'm highly doubtful you showed any concern about that, you see, because your boy Obama "evolved".

So you're saying that Trump evolved in his opinion of Streep's acting talents in the last year?

Many people have evolved on the issue of marriage equality over the years including many Republicans like Dick Cheney and George H.W. Bush(41).

Trump has changed his position on just about everything he ever believed in the past, including a woman's right to choose and his support of single payer health care.
Have you shown any concern about that larry?
I guess as long as his new found beliefs align with yours, that's okay then, huh?

larryc12 » 10 Jan 2017 8:27 am » wrote:Those whores back in Billyboy days must have wanted ol' Billy's ****** grabbing. They were asking for it. Isn't that right? Hypocrite.

Once again you are attempting to rationalize one person's bad behavior by pointing to another's.

I never once called any of Clinton's accusers 'whores.'
But it was nice of you to dishonestly make it look like I had.

So do you think that Clem is right when he says that the women's body language and what they were saying gave Trump the perception that they wanted to be groped?



Was he there in the dozen or so times that Trump has been accused of touching someone inappropriately?
Did he witness their body language or hear what they were saying?

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 8:38 am » wrote:Great point. Juanita Broaddrick wanted to have her lip badly bitten and violently raped by Clinton.

Which little Miss Marxist dishonestly denied for years.

And you've been telling this same filthy lie for years.
I never said that Clinton did not rape Broaddrick.
I said I don't know if he did, and unless you were in the room, you don't know that for sure either.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 8:38 am » wrote:Then smeared her.

How did I smear her you liar?
I pointed out that she first swore under oath that Clinton did not rape her and then in a TV interview she said he did.
That's just a fact, not a smear.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 8:38 am » wrote:Absolutely disgusting, psychopathic behavior by Missy Poo.

Says the guy who defends a serial groper by saying that the women asked for it.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 4:02 pm » wrote: And you've been telling this same filthy lie for years.
I never said that Clinton did not rape Broaddrick.

Liar.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 4:02 pm » wrote: How did I smear her you liar?
I pointed out that she first swore under oath that Clinton did not rape her and then in a TV interview she said he did.
That's just a fact, not a smear.

You said she likely falsely accused Clinton in order to get a book deal, liar.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 3:04 pm » wrote: Yeah.
He failed to shut you up.

Answer the question, toady.


What has Obama accomplished in office that's a success?


Obamacare?

The economy, i.e. the worst recovery since WWII?


The Middle East?

The Iraq War?

The Afghanistan War?


Race relations?

The success of the Democrat Party?

Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2017 9:17 am » wrote:In what court was clinton convicted of that, ***?

ON WHAT TAPE DID HE ADMIT IT?

You are using facts in dispute to make your case, without properly resolving the dispute - the very MARK of dimwittery and ****.

Now you've opened a whole new can of worms.
Clem has been repeating the same filthy lie for years, saying that I have for years defended a 'serial rapist' (Bubba).

It all started when I objected to his referring to Bubba as a 'rapist' because he was never convicted of or charged with that crime.
I told him that I think that's a loaded word that should not be thrown around lightly.

And that is the basis of him posting this **** over and over and over again for years.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 7:36 am » wrote:...your years and years and years of telling lies in defense of an actual real-life rapist, psycho.

There have been Republicans who have been accused of rape, but I would never call them a rapist based on an allegations.

Trump himself has been accused of raping a woman when she was 13 and considering his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and the fact that she says it happened at several of Epstein's parties, it's not all that far-fetched.

But I still do not and would not refer to him as a 'rapist.'

Cannonpointer » 10 Jan 2017 9:19 am » wrote:No, I do not.

But I DO know that there's a broad who is either lying, or whom he judged wrongly when he presumed to grope her on an airplane.

And I FURTHER know that if the complaint were against clinton, your response to it would be far more positive than is your response to it as it stands, against tRump.

You are no better than misty - and sadly, in this instance, no worse. You're both hypocrites and you're both partisan.

Except I never said that Bubba did not rape Juanita Broaddrick.
I said I don't know if he did.
The only two people who can know that with 100% certainty are the two people who were in the room and Clem apparently.

Do I believe that Trump touched some women inappropriately?
Yes I do.
And the reason is that I heard him say from his own mouth that he could.
Not to mention all the other things he has said about women over the years of which there is also plenty of audio evidence from his own mouth.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 4:14 pm » wrote: Now you've opened a whole new can of worms.
Clem has been repeating the same filthy lie for years, saying that I have for years defended a 'serial rapist' (Bubba).

It all started when I objected to his referring to Bubba as a 'rapist' because he was never convicted of or charged with that crime.
I told him that I think that's a loaded word that should not be thrown around lightly.

Liar.

All you do is dishonestly defend any and every accusations against liberal Democrats.

And spread Democrat Talking Point Lies and Propaganda against conservatives.

And casually smear anyone who gets in the way, as you did in accusing John Fund of child molestation.

You're a literal psychopath.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 4:19 pm » wrote: Liar.
All you do is dishonestly defend any and every accusations against liberal Democrats.

****.
Have you ever seen me defend Anthony Weiner or John Edwards (just to name two that I can think of) in their scandals?
And what about that guy who had $90,000 in his freezer?
Did I defend that?

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 4:19 pm » wrote:And spread Democrat Talking Point Lies and Propaganda against conservatives.

You mean state my opinion.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 4:19 pm » wrote:And casually smear anyone who gets in the way, as you did in accusing John Fund of child molestation.
You're a literal psychopath.

I never accused John Fund of child molestation and you know it.
But you continue to tell that same filthy lie.

You are the holier than thou, self righteous piece of **** who even defended the use of torture, not me.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 9:25 am » wrote:Who was refuted by a Brit witness/ non Trump supporter who said the woman aggressively came onto Trump, who was uninterested.

It's amazing how that guy remembered all that from three decades ago.

Riddle me this Puss....how did the Brit know that Trump was 'uninterested.'
Did he ask him, or aside from having a remarkable sense of recall, does he read minds as well?

Do you look like a pretzel yet, because you sure as hell have been twisting yourself into one to defend Putin's Pet?

What a load of ****.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 9:27 am » wrote:Cite a single time I've denied strong evidence put before me.

Wow... a Misty vs. RichClem fight. Thanks for the memories.....

bingster » 10 Jan 2017 5:22 pm » wrote:Wow... a Misty vs. RichClem fight. Thanks for the memories.....

He picked up right where he left off, and he's still as obsessed with Bill Clinton as ever. LOL

Great to see you Bingster.

Termin8tor » 10 Jan 2017 4:10 pm » wrote:You said she likely falsely accused Clinton in order to get a book deal, liar.

I know nothing about her getting a book deal liar.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 5:26 pm » wrote: He picked up right where he left off, and he's still as obsessed with Bill Clinton as ever. LOL

Not that you care, I don't ever want a serial felon/ serial rapist sociopathic liar as president.

That not only didn't bother you in the slightest, you told years of lies on his behalf.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 4:18 pm » wrote: Except I never said that Bubba did not rape Juanita Broaddrick.
I said I don't know if he did.
The only two people who can know that with 100% certainty are the two people who were in the room and Clem apparently.

Do I believe that Trump touched some women inappropriately?
Yes I do.
And the reason is that I heard him say from his own mouth that he could.
Not to mention all the other things he has said about women over the years of which there is also plenty of audio evidence from his own mouth.

But how MANY women does tRump endanger? Bubba Clinton would rape a refrigerator.


8's and down are perfectly safe under a tRump pResidency. And any broad over 40.

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 5:28 pm » wrote: I know nothing about her getting a book deal liar.

Then why did you accuse her of making a false accusation against Clinton to get a book deal, liar?

bingster » 10 Jan 2017 5:22 pm » wrote:Wow... a Misty vs. RichClem fight. Thanks for the memories.....

Anyone ever tell you that you bear a striking resemblance to Al Pacino?

Misty » 10 Jan 2017 4:18 pm » wrote: Except I never said that Bubba did not rape Juanita Broaddrick.
I said I don't know if he did.
The only two people who can know that with 100% certainty are the two people who were in the room and Clem apparently.

Do I believe that Trump touched some women inappropriately?
Yes I do.
And the reason is that I heard him say from his own mouth that he could.
Not to mention all the other things he has said about women over the years of which there is also plenty of audio evidence from his own mouth.

It's never been proved on cosby, but you and I will agree that drinking what that mother **** hands you is unsafe at any speed.

Gonna suggest that bubba clinton is a rape-o mother ****, AND that you would agree, given the existing evidence, IF he had an R behind his name. Just sayin'.

That said, you have a right to your opinion - but that's mine. The evidence on clinton is IN - as is the proof that he - like his friends the bushes - is untouchable.