Flying Monkeys

User avatar
By Nobody
11 Mar 2011 1:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 447 448 449 450 451 1,190
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 2:24 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 13 Jan 2017 2:00 pm » wrote:Then why are his supporters and even former Trump critics so happy with the way things are going, psycho?
Have you seen his approval rating?
It's at a historic low for an incoming POTUS and still falling.

Image
http://www.gallup.com/poll/201833/appro ... nears.aspx
Termin8tor » 13 Jan 2017 2:00 pm » wrote:It's becoming quite clear he's going to keep most of his promises.
And if he does it will only drive up the deficit and the debt.
Termin8tor » 13 Jan 2017 2:00 pm » wrote:I'm still waiting for you to cite one single Trump lie as important as Hillary's lie about the Benghazi attack being caused by a video.
That old thing again.
How did her saying that after the attack change the fact that 4 people were dead?
I'm amazed at how you pinheads always point out that one lie, but you're perfectly willing to swallow a **** of lies every day from Putin's Pet.
Termin8tor » 13 Jan 2017 2:00 pm » wrote:Or Obama's many lies about his health care disaster.
Careful with that one Puss.
Putin's Pet says he's going to replace the ACA with 'something terrific' and it's going to cost less.

And he said he's going to keep the pre-existing conditions clause and the coverage for adult children up to age 26 parts of the ACA.

On Tuesday the number 4 House Republican, Cathy McMorris Rodgers made this pledge:

"No one who has coverage because of Obamacare today will lose that coverage."

That one is surely going to come back to bite them in the ***.

I'm sure if they don't keep those promises you will be happy to say that they lied, right Puss?
Because you are not a partisan hack. :\
User avatar
Termin8tor
13 Jan 2017 2:29 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 2:24 pm » wrote: Have you seen his approval rating?[
It's at a historic low for an incoming POTUS and still falling.
I wasn't referring to the general public but to those who supported him and are watching him closely.

Unlike Obama and Bill Clinton who lied their way into office, then did just about the opposite of what they promised, Trump is going to keep most of his promises.

Which is precisely why Democrat Talking Point Liars like you are trying to destroy him.
User avatar
Termin8tor
13 Jan 2017 2:32 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 2:24 pm » wrote: That old thing again.
How did her saying that after the attack change the fact that 4 people were dead?
Because it was told to support Obama's huge lie to Americans that the War on Terror was largely over, that we'd won and that we were safer, in order pretend he was competent and win re-election. Never saw a word of complaint from you about any of that.

In fact, the opposite was true.

Nothing Trump has said compares to that.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Jan 2017 2:34 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
I just stickied this thread - revenge of the nerds, bitches!

bwahahahaha

bwahahahaha

bwahahahaha

Snicker.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 2:51 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Why did Retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, Trump’s choice for national security adviser, phone Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, the day the Obama administration announced the expulsion of 35 Russian officials as well as other measures in retaliation for the hacking?
According to a senior U.S. government official, Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29th.
What did Flynn say, and did it undercut the U.S. sanctions?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... cbf63f9ac2
Flynn is very cozy with Russia and apparently Putin.
He has appeared on the Kremlin’s principal international propaganda outlet, Russia Today, and received a speaking fee from the cable network.

Last year, Flynn gave a paid speech in Moscow at the anniversary gala of Russia’s English-language state propaganda network, RT.
After his speech, Flynn ate dinner seated at Putin’s table.

Image

What was Flynn talking to the Russian Ambassador about?
Curiously, Putin, who had said that he would retaliate if any new sanctions were put into place, suddenly decided to delay any action, for which Trump praised him on Twitter.

Image

So did Flynn make any promises to Russia/Putin in those phone calls?
Did he tell them that Trump would lift the sanctions put in place by Obama?

Because if he did, he could very likely have violated the Logan Act.

Image

Until January 20th both Trump and Flynn are still private citizens and as such are not authorized to meddle in foreign policy.
I guess nobody told Trump that, because he's been doing it since Election Day.

More and more Trump reminds me of Nixon.
Documents were just uncovered that proved that Nixon interfered in the 1968 Paris Peace Talks in order to undercut Hubert Humphrey's chances at winning the presidential election.

We've already heard Trump say that 'when the president does it, it is not illegal.'
How long before we hear him say, 'I am not a crook.'
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 3:58 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 2:34 pm » wrote:I just stickied this thread - revenge of the nerds, bitches!

bwahahahaha

bwahahahaha

bwahahahaha

Snicker.
I'm gonna catch hell for this.
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 4:02 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Termin8tor » 13 Jan 2017 2:29 pm » wrote:I wasn't referring to the general public but to those who supported him and are watching him closely.
So the rest of us don't count Jackass?

He could be caught in bed with dead hooker or a live boy and his supporters like you would never leave him.

I don't give a **** about whether or not his supporters are happy.
**** all of you for inflicting this dumpster fire on the rest of us.

I see you completely ignored the part of my post where I talked about all of the promises that Putin's Pet has made in regards to his health care plan.

And you also ignored the post about Michael Flynn's cozy relationship with Russia/Putin, and how he is illegally interfering in foreign policy.

What's wrong Puss?
Cat got your tongue?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Jan 2017 4:03 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 3:58 pm » wrote: I'm gonna catch hell for this.
:die:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Jan 2017 4:06 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 4:02 pm » wrote: So the rest of us don't count Jackass?

He could be caught in bed with dead hooker or a live boy and his supporters like you would never leave him.

I don't give a **** about whether or not his supporters are happy.
**** all of you for inflicting this dumpster fire on the rest of us.
LOOK AT THE RANCID PIECE OF **** THE DEMOCRATS GAVE US TO CHOOSE BETWEEN.

You won't even DENY that she stole the nomination - that is an established historical fact. She got the questions so she could prepare her gotchas. She had the DNC working her **** corner.

You act as if tRump was selected over a large field of sterling contenders - HE WAS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO OFFERED SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS KILLING THE COUNTRY.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 4:18 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 4:06 pm » wrote:LOOK AT THE RANCID PIECE OF **** THE DEMOCRATS GAVE US TO CHOOSE BETWEEN.
I totally agree with you.
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 4:06 pm » wrote:You won't even DENY that she stole the nomination - that is an established historical fact.
Is it?
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 4:06 pm » wrote:She got the questions so she could prepare her gotchas.
Questions?
I thought she only got one question at a town hall event?
It's water under the bridge now.
She lost.
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 4:06 pm » wrote:She had the DNC working her **** corner.
I can't disagree with that.
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 4:06 pm » wrote:You act as if tRump was selected over a large field of sterling contenders - HE WAS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WHO OFFERED SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS KILLING THE COUNTRY.
If by 'different' you mean crazy, then yes, he's different.

Out of that bunch, I would have chosen John Kasich.
I even went so far as to actually register as a Republican so I could vote for him in the primary.
I know he's conservative, but I have always liked him.
I just get the vibe from him, that he's a decent person.
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 4:19 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Image

That can't be right.
:loco:
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 4:24 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
This is just a God-awful story.
Congressman’s assistant loses six kids in horrific house fire.

An aide to Maryland Congressman Elijah Cummings lost six of her nine children early Thursday in a horrific house fire, officials said, and two of her surviving kids are fighting for their lives.

Katie Malone’s 8-year-old daughter was credited with saving her 4- and 5-year-old brothers by carrying them out of the flame-filled home around midnight.

The 8-year-old, Erin, was later released from Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, but her mother and surviving siblings, Jack and Jane, were in critical condition.

Malone has worked with Rep. Elijah Cummings for more than 11 years, overseeing various issues including immigration, postal services and the military.

“It’s a very difficult time for our office,” Cummings said at a news conference Thursday.

Cummings had a lengthy discussion with Malone’s husband, William, who assured him that his wife was “going to be OK.”

The inferno ripped through the family’s three-story home, causing the top two floors to collapse.

The Baltimore Fire Department pulled the first little body from the smoldering wreckage around 10:30 a.m. — nearly 10 hours after the fire started.

They worked throughout the day, wading through the charred building looking for any signs of life.

But by Thursday afternoon, they made the grim discovery of five other children.

The six deceased kids were a 9-month-old boy, a 2-year-old boy, 3-year-old twin girls, a 10-year-old girl and an 11-year-old girl, the fire department said.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Jan 2017 4:41 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
Yes, it is. It's an established historical fact that she stole the nomination.
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 4:18 pm » wrote: Questions?
I thought she only got one question at a town hall event?
It's water under the bridge now.
She lost.
She got more than one question in advance, and not just at a town hall. She got the questions for a debate with bernie. The NBC shill who gave them to her had to lose her job over it.
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 4:18 pm » wrote: If by 'different' you mean crazy, then yes, he's different.
By different, I mean ANYTHING but more of the same.
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 4:18 pm » wrote: Out of that bunch, I would have chosen John Kasich.
...
I know he's conservative, but
That makes one of us. I say he was more of the same.

And low energy.
And a loser.
Lyin' John.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 4:52 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
He was up and Tweeting like a madman before 6 AM today.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 4:53 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 4:41 pm » wrote:That makes one of us. I say he was more of the same.
And low energy.
And a loser.
Lyin' John.
Kasich didn't get a nickname from Trump did he? LOL
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Jan 2017 5:05 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 4:53 pm » wrote: Kasich didn't get a nickname from Trump did he? LOL
:rofl:

And what does THAT tell us?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UC96g1A4Nc
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 5:11 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
First they tried to defang the Congressional ethics watchdog, which didn't work out so well for them, and now they are going after the watchdog who oversees the Executive branch.
Chaffetz threatens to subpoena federal ethics watchdog over Trump criticism.

House Republicans have found a subject for their opening review of conflicts of interest under Donald Trump: the federal official in charge of investigating conflicts of interest.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the head of the House Oversight Committee, criticized the director of the federal Office of Government Ethics on Thursday over his criticism of Donald Trump’s plan to address conflicts of interest.

And he threatened to subpoena the official, Walter Shaub, if he refuses to participate in an official interview.

“He is coming in. This is not going to be an optional exercise,” Chaffetz said, adding that he expected a meeting within a few weeks.
The New York Times reports that in his letter Chaffetz noted that the House Oversight Committee has jurisdiction over the Office of Government Ethics, which was viewed as a suggestion that he might shut the office down.

If ever there was a time when we needed the Office of Government Ethics, this is it, and they are threatening to shut it down.
User avatar
Nobody
13 Jan 2017 5:12 pm
User avatar
Forum Patron Emeritus
15,487 posts
Cannonpointer » 13 Jan 2017 5:05 pm » wrote: :rofl:
And what does THAT tell us?
I think Trump liked him.
He supposedly offered him the VP slot and Kasich turned it down.
User avatar
Cannonpointer
13 Jan 2017 5:29 pm
User avatar
98% Macho Man
98% Macho Man
46,629 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 5:12 pm » wrote: I think Trump liked him.
He supposedly offered him the VP slot and Kasich turned it down.
Everyone knows tRump is bullet bait. Kasich was a fool to say no.

What a loser. :LOL:
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice

"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"

You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.

Who cuts off your dick is not a friend

An opinion you won't defend is not your own

Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe

When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge

If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
User avatar
Termin8tor
13 Jan 2017 6:19 pm
User avatar
     
4,616 posts
Misty » 13 Jan 2017 4:02 pm » wrote: So the rest of us don't count Jackass?

He could be caught in bed with dead hooker or a live boy and his supporters like you would never leave him.

I don't give a **** about whether or not his supporters are happy.
**** all of you for inflicting this dumpster fire on the rest of us.

I see you completely ignored the part of my post where I talked about all of the promises that Putin's Pet has made in regards to his health care plan.

And you also ignored the post about Michael Flynn's cozy relationship with Russia/Putin, and how he is illegally interfering in foreign policy.

What's wrong Puss?
Cat got your tongue?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Whatever facts or logic I cite, however impeccable, you'll lie and dissemble and babble.
1 447 448 449 450 451 1,190

Who is online

In total there are 6281 users online :: 14 registered, 18 bots, and 6249 guests
Bots: MicroMessenger, Bolt, DuckDuckBot, Mediatoolkitbot, TTD-Content, ADmantX, okhttp, GPTBot, proximic, CriteoBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7, bingbot
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search