Liberal Forum

Our new National Security Adviser's wonderful son.
Another misogynist pig.

Awww Shucks!

He was having such a good day and then he had to go and step on his own dick again.

Without evidence, Trump tells lawmakers 3 million to 5 million illegal ballots cost him the popular vote.

He's still obsessing over the stupid election.

Two people familiar with the meeting said Trump spent about 10 minutes at the start of the bipartisan gathering rehashing the campaign.

These people plagiarize everything.
Trump's new @POTUS Twitter account uses image from Obama's inauguration as their cover photo.







They have changed it now. LOL

The other day when Trump spoke at the CIA he once again said that we should have taken Iraq's oil, and then he added, "Maybe we'll have another chance."

When asked about it at today's press conference, Sean Spicer refused to rule out the possibility that Trump would ever send US troops into Iraq to take their oil.

Not surprisingly Iraqis are not too happy about this.
And we still have about 5,000 troops in Iraq.

When is Trump going to learn that he is no longer campaigning?
When he speaks as the president he's stating policy.

Iraqis Are Pissed That Trump Said The US Might Try To Seize Their Oil, Again

I'm sure that the Iraqis will take great comfort in the fact that our new Secretary Of State was the CEO of ExxonMobil.

I guess our new PeeOTUS does not know that invading a country and taking their resources is a war crime.

Speaking of Trump speaking at the CIA....WTF?
Why didn't he have prepared remarks?

He stood in front of that memorial wall and just rambled on about a bunch of nonsense.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GMBqDN7-QLg

I have heard several former CIA people on TV say that people who work at the CIA would never cheer and clap in front of that wall. That area is considered hallowed ground.

They were right.

Donald Trump reportedly planted lackeys at CIA headquarters to give illusion of widespread support for his speech.

Of course.

Just like he had people at his press conference last week to applaud and he had paid actors cheering for him when he came down that escalator in Trump Tower the day he made the announcement that he was running for POTUS, everything about this man is fake.

It's all a big show.

HEY CLEM!

When Trump said several times during the campaign that the unemployment rate was 42% was it:

1. The truth?

2. A Lie?

3. ****?

Misty » 23 Jan 2017 4:28 pm » wrote: Was that goal post very heavy to move?
I guess you don't know what the word 'individual' in my question means.

Oh my gosh, do you never run out of ridiculous troll tricks?

An abuse of power is an abuse of power.

An impeachable offense is an impeachable offense.

Obama is responsible for that and the cover up.

Misty » 23 Jan 2017 9:16 pm » wrote:Awww Shucks!

He was having such a good day and then he had to go and step on his own dick again.

Without evidence, Trump tells lawmakers 3 million to 5 million illegal ballots cost him the popular vote.

He's still obsessing over the stupid election.

You really hate it when someone points out the truth.

That Democrats commit massive voter fraud as their Modus Operandi to power.

And it's going to be vastly reduced quite soon.

Misty » 23 Jan 2017 4:28 pm » wrote: First of all 501(c)(4)s aren't allowed to have political activities as their primary purpose.
The groups that were looked at had names that sounded political like 'Tea Party.'

Bulls*** as usual. Conservative groups were singled out; almost all liberal groups escaped the delays and harassment.
Even moonbat Rachel Maddow figured that out, Dim.

This is beyond dispute. The only question is, what will Repubs do about it.

Obama's corrupt Justice Dept. didn't lift a finger to investigate it, just cover it up.

Secondly this was a policy initiated by the IRS itself, not Obama.

At Obama's implicit instigation, and he allowed it to be covered up. That's two impeachable offenses.

Misty » 23 Jan 2017 4:33 pm » wrote: Sorry Puss.
There was a lot of doubt in the intelligence community about WMD's and especially nuclear weapons.
Bush and Cheney massaged the intelligence, cherry picked what fit their agenda, and in some cases out and out lied about it.

Why aren't you accusing both Clinton's and Democrats of lying, too, psycho?


Because you're a lying political hack.

What Bush and Cheney said was accepted broadly going all the back to when Clinton was in office. Hillary supported the war on that basis, as did many Democrats.

Not one word of doubt from any of them, including those that had direct access to the intell. Support from every US intelligence agency, with minimal dissent.

But the Democrat Talking Point Lie was that Dems were fooled by that master manipulator George W. Bush, and you repeat that lie like you repeat all of their lies.

Misty » 23 Jan 2017 9:16 pm » wrote:Awww Shucks!

He was having such a good day and then he had to go and step on his own dick again.

Without evidence, Trump tells lawmakers 3 million to 5 million illegal ballots cost him the popular vote.

He's still obsessing over the stupid election.

Agreed. He needs to quit with that ****. But the **** left needs to quit obsessing over the election, too.

larryc12 » 24 Jan 2017 7:32 am » wrote: Agreed. He needs to quit with that ****. But the **** left needs to quit obsessing over the election, too.

Not really concerned with that stuff.

Personally, I am concerned with the executive orders he has signed particularly with the ACA. As I understand them he has directed federal agencies to look at ways to reduce the burden and to look for ways to not enforce the mandate. I of course am delighted BUT, BUT, BUT, is this something that can be done by executive order? It sounds more like Obama's method of skirting congress thru non enforcement of laws. EOs aren't supposed to nullify a law. And is something we bitched about with Obama.

But if the left wants to be more concerned with crowd size, whether he recognized the memorial wall at the CIA, his tweets, etc, and the right get's involved with those conversations nothing has really changed.

Officials beg Trump to send help after storms kill 20 across South

Desperate officials pleaded with President Donald Trump to send federal assistance Monday after at least 20 people were killed by storms and tornadoes that caused devastation authorities likened to the impact of a nuclear blast.

Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant said he had dispatched a letter to Trump pleading for help after four people were killed in his state.

He said more 1,000 homes were damaged in Hattiesburg and surrounding Forrest County alone — 239 of which were obliterated.

In Dougherty County, Georgia, where four people were killed, county commission Chairman Chris Cohilas said Monday that he has been "begging FEMA for boots on the ground," referring to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

"I'm asking President Trump to cut through the red tape and get people on the damned ground here," he said.

Ironic.
Mississippi and Georgia....two states that voted for Trump.

Misty » 24 Jan 2017 10:40 am » wrote: Ironic.
Mississippi and Georgia....two states that voted for Trump.

Really? What's "ironic" about it?

Misty » 24 Jan 2017 10:40 am » wrote: Ironic.
Mississippi and Georgia....two states that voted for Trump.

What's ironic about it? The taxes they pay don't count?


Get the federal government out of disaster relief, and states will pick up the burden themselves.


Or not, leaving the private sector to offer its services.

Back during the campaign, Chuck Todd asked Trump where he got his military advice from and Trump said, "I watch the shows."
It looks like Trump still gets a lot of his ideas directly from watching TV.
Last night Bill O'Reilly had a segment about the violence in Chicago where he used the word 'carnage' cited some statistics and then asked, "Can the Feds go in?"



Shortly after that Trump Tweeted this:



Note that he used the word 'carnage' in quotes, cited the same statistics and suggested sending in the Feds.
That came right from O'Reilly's mouth.

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-t ... ago-2017-1

Termin8tor » 24 Jan 2017 12:27 pm » wrote:What's ironic about it? The taxes they pay don't count?
Get the federal government out of disaster relief, and states will pick up the burden themselves.

Mississippi is the poorest state in the nation jackass.
And in the top two when it comes to being the reddest of states.
Funny how you pinheads always talk about the problems in some of the cities in blue states, but you ignore the fact that many of the poorest states are red states.

Termin8tor » 24 Jan 2017 12:27 pm » wrote:Or not, leaving the private sector to offer its services.

WTF is the private sector going to do about it?
Are they going to offer their services for FREE to people who have lost everything?
I don't think so.

I'm surprised you didn't mention churches pitching in.

You would say anything to protect anyone with an R after their name.
Even give the middle finger to people who are suffering.
You **** heartless bastard.

Huey » 24 Jan 2017 7:42 am » wrote:Personally, I am concerned with the executive orders he has signed particularly with the ACA. As I understand them he has directed federal agencies to look at ways to reduce the burden and to look for ways to not enforce the mandate. I of course am delighted BUT, BUT, BUT, is this something that can be done by executive order? It sounds more like Obama's method of skirting congress thru non enforcement of laws. EOs aren't supposed to nullify a law. And is something we bitched about with Obama.

But if the left wants to be more concerned with crowd size, whether he recognized the memorial wall at the CIA, his tweets, etc, and the right get's involved with those conversations nothing has really changed.

I think the only one who is obsessed with the crowd size is Trump.

No one ever expected him to get as big a crowd as Obama did in 2009.
For one thing, that was a historic election, with him being the first black president.
Washington DC is almost 50% black, so of course they would go and see the first black president being sworn in right in their own city.

It's not just the left that didn't like what he did at the CIA.
Many intelligence people said that it was disrespectful to have people laughing and applauding and for him to give a political speech in front of that wall.
The people in the first two rows who were laughing and applauding were people he brought in.

It would be like a president standing in the middle of Arlington Cemetery, giving a political speech, and talking about how many times he was on the cover of Time Magazine.

Apparently he brings a cheering section with him whenever he speaks somewhere.
I remember when he gave his recent press conference, I thought it was odd to hear people applauding.
I'm sure it wasn't members of the press applauding him considering the way that he talks about them.

It was just proven that the people who stood in Trump Tower holding signs and cheering him as he came down that escalator in June of 2015 were paid actors.
He had to admit it to the FEC.

It's all like some kind of a big show.

As far as his Tweets, again, not just the left that's concerned.
Many members of his own party have said that they wish he would stop Tweeting.

He's not campaigning any more.
He's the president, and when the president says something it carries a lot of weight.

BTW, they say he's Tweeting from an unsecured phone, which leaves his Twitter account and his Direct Messages open to hackers.
Ironic, considering all the hooplah about the private server.
And he has deleted some of his Tweets, which would be in violation of the Federal Records Act.

I'm concerned about a lot of things including his policies and some of his appointments.
Although as far as his policies go, it's hard to tell exactly what he's going to do.
He doesn't really have a set ideology.

Sorry, I went on longer than I needed to.
I guess I just felt like venting, and your post was the first one I saw.

Misty » 23 Jan 2017 4:33 pm » wrote: Sorry Puss.
There was a lot of doubt in the intelligence community about WMD's and especially nuclear weapons.
Bush and Cheney massaged the intelligence, cherry picked what fit their agenda, and in some cases out and out lied about it.

I'll keep my response brief.

Liar.

Termin8tor » 25 Jan 2017 10:08 pm » wrote:I'll keep my response brief.
Liar.

I wish I had a dollar for every time you called me a liar over the last 9 years.
I'd be a millionaire.

There's something really weird happening with your posts.
When I quote them they seem to get all messed up and they are really hard to respond to.



I see what it is.

It's supposed to look like these.




But your earlier quote from 9:56 is coming out like this:



Are you doing that?
If you are, cut it out.
If not let me know so if it's a glitch in the forum or a wrong setting I can get the issue resolved for you like I did when you first came back and your content was not showing up.

I kept on Ronjul the IT guy until the issue was resolved.
Which BTW you never thanked me for, you ungrateful bastard.

If I hadn't done that your stuff would still be invisible.
Come to think of it why the **** did I do that?
I liked you so much better when you were invisible.