Liberal Forum

My GOD you are an endless bag of gas, Glory Hole.You have become the saddest and most pathetic self-parodist on the board. Only Goofboy gives you a run for the retard money, son.

My GOD you are an endless bag of gas, Glory Hole.You have become the saddest and most pathetic self-parodist on the board. Only Goofboy gives you a run for the retard money, son.Golfboy is the love child of Clem and larryc12.How do you like the Flying Monkeys thread now that it's under new management?Riveting isn't it?

I don't. You should call chuck and get permission to dump every clempost into a clempile, and clean up your thread and reclaim it. This should be the ONE THREAD where that pile of shiit is not allowed on your shoe. Bust a move, homegirl.

Golfboy is the love child of Clem and larryc12. Translation into non-moonbat English; he's logical, knowledgeable and expresses common sense. How do you like the Flying Monkeys thread now that it's under new management? Riveting isn't it? Oh gosh, it was much more exciting when you were giving everyone riveting details about some incremental anti-abortion law in Missouri or quoting some obscure Repub from East Bumf*** saying something dumb while a little tipsy. Momentous, ground shaking issues for sure. I mean, who would ever want to talk about the horrific failure of Obama's economic policies? The ongoing collapse of his health care system?

How do you like the Flying Monkeys thread now that it's under new management? Riveting isn't it? I'd say that a huge abortion scandal involving the killing of literal babies is quite riveting, wouldn't you? As is the complete lack of coverage by the liberal, Obama-fawning MSM. Obama opposed legislation that would prevent this type of moral horror. Philadelphia abortion clinic horror: We've forgotten what belongs on Page One. Butchering babies that were already born and were older than the state's 24-week limit for abortions is the story. That one is murder and the other is a legal procedure is morally irreconcilable. This is not about being "pro-choice" or "pro-life." It is about basic human rights.Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven't heard about these sickening accusations? It's not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page. The revolting revelations of Gosnell's former staff, who have been testifying to what they witnessed and did during late-term abortions, should shock anyone with a heart. NBC-10 Philadelphia reported that, Stephen Massof, a former Gosnell worker, "described how he snipped the spinal cords of babies, calling it, 'literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body." One former worker, Adrienne Moton, testified that Gosnell taught her his "snipping" technique to use on infants born alive. Massof, who, like other witnesses, has himself pleaded guilty to serious crimes, testified "It would rain fetuses. Fetuses and blood all over the place." Here is the headline the Associated Press put on a story about his testimony that he saw 100 babies born and then snipped: "Staffer describes chaos at PA abortion clinic." "Chaos" isn't really the story here. Butchering babies that were already born and were older than the state's 24-week limit for abortions is the story. There is a reason the late Democratic senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan called this procedure infanticide.Planned Parenthood recently claimed that the possibility of infants surviving late-term abortions was "highly unusual." The Gosnell case suggests otherwise. Regardless of such quibbles, about whether Gosnell was killing the infants one second after they left the womb instead of partially inside or completely inside the womb — as in a routine late-term abortion — is merely a matter of geography. That one is murder and the other is a legal procedure is morally irreconcilable.A Lexis-Nexis search shows none of the news shows on the three major national television networks has mentioned the Gosnell trial in the last three months. The exception is when Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan hijacked a segment on Meet the Press meant to foment outrage over an anti-abortion rights law in some backward red state.The Washington Post has not published original reporting on this during the trial and The New York Times saw fit to run one original story on A-17 on the trial's first day. They've been silent ever since, despite headline-worthy testimony. Let me state the obvious. This should be front page news. http://www.usatoday....column/2072577/

Man, Clem, you could **** up a wet dream. So much for a one time great thread.

How do you like the Flying Monkeys thread now that it's under new management?I don't. You should call chuck and get permission to dump every clempost into a clempile, and clean up your thread and reclaim it. This should be the ONE THREAD where that pile of shiit is not allowed on your shoe.Bust a move, homegirl.You know that's never going to happen CP.We have strict orders not to touch the posting monkey's stuff.One would think that under those circumstances he would be a little grateful, but no.He treats this forum like his own personal toilet.David likes him because he's a prolific poster, but I don't think he realizes how many people Clem has driven off the forum.If there was some way to do a cost benefit analysis, I wonder what it would show.

Man, Clem, you could **** up a wet dream. So much for a one time great thread. Oh yeah, people could barely sleep waiting for Missy Poo to leave another post about some irrelevant Repub in the midwest saying something dumb. Or some exciting story about zoning laws effecting abortion clinics. Wow! Say, what did you think about my last post about babies being butchered?

I'd say that a huge abortion scandal involving the killing of literal babies is quite riveting, wouldn't you?Literal babies? You mean as opposed to figurative ones?If that's so riveting then what's stopping you from starting your own thread about it instead of insisting that it must be discussed here in this thread?WTF is up with this insane obsession with me?From day one, when I started posting here you have been fixated on me.It's really pretty creepy and sad.

Oh yeah, people could barely sleep waiting for Missy Poo to leave another post about some irrelevant Repub in the midwest saying something dumb. And people can barely sleep waiting for you to drag up one of your 3 or 4 year old threads and respond to your own posts.You know what Clem, if people don't care about the stuff I care about, they are perfectly free not to read this thread.And that goes for you too.I can't start any new threads because you derail every one of them, so this thread was like my refuge, and now you **** all over this too.I'm really sick and tired of you telling me what I can and cannot talk about.You don't own this **** forum.

I'd say that a huge abortion scandal involving the killing of literal babies is quite riveting, wouldn't you? Literal babies? You mean as opposed to figurative ones? If that's so riveting then what's stopping you from starting your own thread about it instead of insisting that it must be discussed here in this thread? WTF is up with this insane obsession with me? From day one, when I started posting here you have been fixated on me. It's really pretty creepy and sad. Speaking of creepy and sad, you didn't write one single word about that "abortion" horror. Just whined about yourself. I'm really sick and tired of you telling me what I can and cannot talk about. You don't own this **** forum. Hey moonbat, you can still post whatever you want in this thread. If your sources and thoughts outweigh mine, it makes no difference what I write. The real problem is, you know that I refute your bulls*** and present information you don't want to address. So you're humiliated in your own thread.

Speaking of creepy and sad, you didn't write one single word about that "abortion" horror.Just whined about yourself.I learned that from you.

Speaking of creepy and sad, you didn't write one single word about that "abortion" horror. Just whined about yourself. I learned that from you. I dodge important issues? Can't you even tell believable lies? This would be funny, if it wasn't so sad. Who likes taxes? Democrats, and no one else. Posted by Chris Cillizza and Sean Sullivan on April 10, 2013 at 7:00 am A clear majority of Americans have an unfavorable view of the federal income tax system, according to new Washington Post-ABC News polling. But, in a somewhat remarkable finding, a majority of Democrats view the tax system in a positive light while Republicans and Independents carry the exact opposite view. http://www.washingto...e-else/?hpid=z1

I dodge important issues? You dodge issues that you are uncomfortable with. Hey moonbat, you can still post whatever you want in this thread. No dingbat I can't post whatever I want, because you call everything I post about a micro-issue or lable it as insignificant, or unimportant and turn the subject right back to what you want to talk about. After reading a thread you started today, I understand why you do that now. It's just a diversionary tactic. When you can't dispute what someone says, you use the economy as a smokescreen to divert away from the subject. I didn't see it before, because I thought you only did that to me. But I saw today that you do it to everyone who brings up a subject that you are uncomfortable with. "Hey look, a squirrel!"

Uncle Rich, please tell us again how you play basketball and your dick doesn't work, or the story abotu not needing consent form a woman or your wife.

Hey moonbat, you can still post whatever you want in this thread. No dingbat I can't post whatever I want, because you call everything I post about a micro-issue or lable it as insignificant, or unimportant and turn the subject right back to what you want to talk about. You are absolutely clueless. You "can't" because I'll criticize your posts? Hey moonbat, you can write whatever posts you want. And I can ridicule or criticize them. That's called freedom of speech or "debate." Typical leftist, you despise actual debate and exchange of ideas.

You are absolutely clueless.You "can't" because I'll criticize your posts? Hey moonbat, you can write whatever posts you want.And I can ridicule or criticize them. That's called freedom of speech or "debate." Speaking of clueless, you have no right to freedom of speech on a privately owned forum, and as far as debate goes....You don't have a clue what that is.Anytime you disagree with someone, you call them a liar and a moonbat.I may not be as smart as you, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't qualify as debate.Typical leftist, you despise actual debate and exchange of ideas.Typical right wing flying monkey.One can hardly call what you do on this forum 'actual debate and exchange of ideas'.

Speaking of clueless, you have no right to freedom of speech on a privately owned forum, and as far as debate goes.... You don't have a clue what that is. Try again moonbat. You made a silly mistake. You can post in this thread. You stupidly claimed you "can't." Anytime you disagree with someone, you call them a liar and a moonbat. I have had many, many exchanges with people with whom I disagree, sometimes dramatically, but if they are honest and do their best to be thoughtful, I treat them respectfully. Siegfried recently, for example. If you don't want to be called a liar or a moonbat, stop lying and being stupid. I may not be as smart as you, but I'm pretty sure that doesn't qualify as debate. Typical right wing flying monkey. One can hardly call what you do on this forum 'actual debate and exchange of ideas'. True, I am completely unable to debate with someone who refuses to, just like a boxer cannot fight someone who refuses to enter the ring. Duuuh.

There's absolutely no liberal bias in the MSM, insist moonbats. There's only "corporate" bias. Hmmm, why would corporations censor a huge story about the killing of babies, the deaths of female patients and lots of ugly, graphic detail? Foul Coverage: Nets Give Basketball Scandal 41 Minutes, Baby Murder Trial 0 Outraged networks give abusive basketball coach more than 40 minutes; murderous abortionist, zero. Mike Rice, the disgraced former Rutgers basketball coach allegedly killed a woman and at least seven viable, born-alive babies “by plunging scissors into their spinal cords” in his filthy, macabre “house of horrors” abortion clinic. Oh wait, my mistake. Rice was fired last week from Rutgers over video of him shoving, kicking and yelling at his players, throwing basketballs at them and – most damning – using “homophobic slurs.” That’s made Rice the most notorious villain in America. And in one week it earned him 36 network news stories clocking in at 41 minutes, 26 seconds of air time on ABC, CBS and NBC. Now, had Rice been accused of killing a woman and eight babies, he’d be enjoying the same anonymity as Kermit Gosnell – provided the killings were carried out in an abortion clinic. Gosnell is the West Philadelphia abortionist who ran an unimaginable charnel house of a “clinic,” for 30 years. Witnesses testified that he may have murdered over 100 babies outside the womb. Gosnell’s trial, underway for weeks, has featured wrenching testimony and horrific details. And it has received exactly zero seconds of airtime on the broadcast networks. http://www.mrc.org/a...-murder-trial-0

Try again moonbat. You made a silly mistake. You can post in this thread.I never said I was physically unable to post in this thread dingbat.What I meant was I can't make a post without having to read your insane rantings about it and having you derail the subject.I have had many, many exchanges with people with whom I disagree, sometimes dramatically, but if they are honest and do their best to be thoughtful, I treat them respectfully.****. I have seen you call brand new members moonbats and run them off.