Liberal Forum

Misty » 27 Jan 2017 5:20 pm » wrote: They didn't post a link to the recording, however the article said, "The remarks of all lawmakers quoted in this story were confirmed by their offices or by the lawmakers themselves."

The making of the sausage is disgusting enough - hearing them planning to change rapists in mid-gang bang must have been a real earful of ****.

Termin8tor » 27 Jan 2017 10:01 pm » wrote: I've gotten a great deal of praise and support from people whose judgment I trust.

Nighthawk and Bilco are messaging you? They're probably trying to set up a bathroom meet.

Termin8tor » 28 Jan 2017 4:21 pm » wrote:It happened nine or so years ago.
Here's a hint, Dim.
He's married and doesn't do that anymore, so what's your freaking point?

Here's a hint Doofus.
He was married when that Access Hollywood video was shot.

As a matter of fact he was a newlywed.
He married Melania on January 22, 2005 and that video was shot in September of that same year when he was in Hollywood for the Emmy Awards.

Any more lies you want to tell on behalf of your Circus Peanut Messiah?

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 8:25 am » wrote: Well, that's just another of your incessant lies. Trump has no "plan to bring back torture".

Right. He was lying when he said it.

With his mouth.

You sure like balls on your chin, son.

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 4:42 pm » wrote: Here's a hint Doofus.
He was married when that Access Hollywood video was shot.

As a matter of fact he was a newlywed.
He married Melania on January 22, 2005 and that video was shot in September of that same year when he was in Hollywood for the Emmy Awards.

Any more lies you want to tell on behalf of your Circus Peanut Messiah?

He ain't got **** on Kennedy or Clinton. How about you stop freaking out and discuss real issues? U are starting to sound like wharf and willie.

Termin8tor » 28 Jan 2017 1:17 pm » wrote: That was what, 9 years ago, yet you're still babbling hysterically about it?

Imbecile.

Yeah, in his reckless youth, ***.

Funny thing, you queers were focused on where obama attended elementary school - something he had no control of. The left is focusing on **** a 60 year old man said that was a tad unpResidential.

And you call them out based on some hypocritical, ***-pulled statute of limitations?

It didn't apply to obama attending a church, son.

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 2:54 pm » wrote: No, I heard those words in October of 2016, not 9 years ago jackass.
Anyway, is there a statute of limitations on being a misogynist pig?

The only crime that has no statute of limitations is attending a muslim elementary school.

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 3:43 pm » wrote:WOW! OH WOW!

So I took Golfboy off ignore to find the post where he said that he pinned my thread, so I could post it in my last post.
I thought there was only one, but apparently he's the one who kept pinning that thread.

While I had him off ignore I looked through the rest of his posts in that thread and this is what I found.
These are all from one thread, and these are only the posts where he actually mentioned my name.
There were many more where he only referred to me as 'she.'

I'd say that Golfboy like P #45 has a little trouble letting things go.



This one must be RichClem's love child.

Termin8tor » 28 Jan 2017 4:21 pm » wrote: He's married and doesn't do that anymore, so what's your freaking point?

Are you defending larry craig or donald tRump, you *** worshiping imbecile? tRump was married when he DID that, ya fruit loop.

Racetex (RSIG) » 28 Jan 2017 4:46 pm » wrote: He ain't got **** on Kennedy or Clinton. How about you stop freaking out and discuss real issues? U are starting to sound like wharf and willie.

Don't take any **** off the lying dirty whore, racetex - grabber by the ******!

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 10:58 am » wrote: Then maybe he needs to stop going around saying that he thinks that torture works.

You said he plans to bring back torture. That's a lie. Lying is what you do.

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 4:43 pm » wrote:Right. He was lying when he said it.

With his mouth.

You sure like balls on your chin, son.

Then show me where Trump said he's bringing back torture.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 5:59 pm » wrote: Then show me where Trump said he's bringing back torture.

So you can parse the meaning of the word "is" while fondling my penis, bathroom boy? If I want to see wonky *** defeating the actual meanings of words, I'll go to your source and avoid your ham-handed delivery of the material, tard.

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 10:58 am » wrote: Then maybe he needs to stop going around saying that he thinks that torture works.

Let me ask both you and Cannon something.

Your 12 year old daughter has been kidnapped by a psychopath and he has her buried alive in a coffin where she can't move and has but a tube giving her air in 110 degree heat, as told to you by the now captive psychopath. He laughs at you while telling you about what he has done with her. The FBI wants your permission to water board the **** to give up where he has her. What do you say?

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 6:10 pm » wrote:So you can parse the meaning of the word "is" while fondling my penis, bathroom boy?

Whether you realize it or not (probably not), you become more and more irrelevant with **** like that.

If I want to see wonky *** defeating the actual meanings of words, I'll go to your source and avoid your ham-handed delivery of the material, tard.

Show where Trump said he is bringing back torture or cease and desist.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 6:16 pm » wrote: Your 12 year old daughter has been kidnapped by a psychopath

Gonna stop the gay parade right there.

Gonna return the rhetorical question. Your wife is hot for sex. She wears a negligee and flaunts her stuff, telling you she's horny.

What would YOU do?

Okay - now, stay with me.

Would you respect the right of the federal government to do that, too?

You pretend to be a Christian, son.

Christ would not torture - you do not follow Christ's teachings. They're good enough for Sunday, but Monday through Saturday, in your occurring world, Jesus can go **** himself.

You may now **** off, Jack Bauer.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 6:19 pm » wrote: Whether you realize it or not (probably not), you become more and more irrelevant with **** like that.

Says the cliche queer who defends torture with jack bauer scenarios.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 6:19 pm » wrote: Show where Trump said he is bringing back torture or cease and desist.

I'll do neither, ***. I'll keep saying it, and let you keep lying. **** off with your invitation to a pussified parsing party, Petunia - I pass, pink-pantied passion fruit.

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 6:22 pm » wrote:Gonna stop the gay parade right there.

Gonna return the rhetorical question. Your wife is hot for sex. She wears a negligee and flaunts her stuff, telling you she's horny.

What would YOU do?

Okay - now, stay with me.

Would you respect the right of the federal government to do that, too?

To do what? Are you drunk on your ***?

You pretend to be a Christian, son.

No, I don't, liar.

Christ would not torture - you do not follow Christ's teachings. They're good enough for Sunday, but Monday through Saturday, in your occurring world, Jesus can go **** himself.

You may now **** off, Jack Bauer.

Just answer the **** question, if you please, coward. God will forgive me for saving my daughter's life. I never have thought of myself as a great Christian.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 6:30 pm » wrote:
To do what? Are you drunk on your ***?

No, I don't, liar.

Just answer the **** question, if you please, coward. God will forgive me for saving my daughter's life. I never have thought of myself as a great Christian.

Are you really so stupid that I need to explain that response?
Okay, dillweed - here we go.

It is my HOPE that in the scenario I described, you would have sex with your wife. In that scenario, she is clearly asking for sex. You are her husband. You should not leave her hanging.

Just because YOU would have sex with your wife (an assumption now in question, since you needed clarification and are clearly a bathroomer, anyway), that does not mean the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has the right to have sex with your wife.

Likewise, just because YOU might conceivably (and I doubt you have the guts - but I'm playing along, Nancy) torture the entirely imaginary kidnapper of your perfectly UN-kidnapped daughter, that does not mean we should vote for the federal government to operate TORTURE CHAMBERS, you romantic, imaginative, effeminate little fop.

Do you get it now, son?

Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for others.

But behind this mask of ultraconfidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism.