Liberal Forum

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 5:59 pm » wrote: Then show me where Trump said he's bringing back torture.

"Would I approve water boarding? You bet your *** I would! In a heart beat. I would approve MORE than that. It works! And if it doesn't work, they deserve it anyway, for what they did to us." - Donald Trump, candidate for president.

Okay, *** - PARSE! GO!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SCTRdsDXng

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 6:19 pm » wrote: Show where Trump said he is bringing back torture or cease and desist.

"Would I approve water boarding? You bet your *** I would approve water boarding - you bet your *** i would." - Donald Trump at a rally, candidate for president.

Okay, PARSE! GO!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aODtnLeSDYg

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 6:39 pm » wrote:Are you really so stupid that I need to explain that response?

No, I'm smart enough that I know that you are off your rocker and that you are a coward who won't answer a simple question.

Okay, dillweed - here we go.

It is my HOPE that in the scenario I described, you would have sex with your wife. In that scenario, she is clearly asking for sex. You are her husband. You should not leave her hanging.

Just because YOU would have sex with your wife (an assumption now in question, since you needed clarification and are clearly a bathroomer, anyway), that does not mean the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT has the right to have sex with your wife.

Likewise, just because YOU might conceivably (I doubt you have the guts - but I'm playing along, Nancy) torture the entirely imaginary kidnapper of your perfectly UN-kidnapped daughter, that does not mean we should vote for the federal government to operate TORTURE CHAMBERS, you romantic, imaginative, effeminate little fop.

Do you get it now, son?

I'll tell you what I get. You are a despicable human being that would let his daughter suffer immeasurably and DIE at the hands of a just as despicable human being as you so you could tell everyone you wouldn't water board anyone. And - just as importantly - you're a despicable human being that would let our troops die at the hands of just as despicable human beings as you because you wouldn't water board anyone.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 6:52 pm » wrote: I'll tell you what I get. You are a despicable human being that would let his daughter suffer immeasurably and DIE at the hands of a just as despicable human being as you so you could tell everyone you wouldn't water board anyone. And - just as importantly - you're a despicable human being that would let our troops die at the hands of just as despicable human beings as you because you wouldn't water board anyone.

So, if I don't go along with operating federal torture chambers, I'm despicable - that's the lay of dick sucker land?

That's why I reside in ****** grabber land, dick sucker.

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 6:58 pm » wrote:So, if I don't go along with operating federal torture chambers, I'm despicable - that's the lay of dick sucker land?

That's why I reside in ****** grabber land, dick sucker.

Call me all the childish names you want, but you're a despicable human being who would let his daughter SUFFER IMMEASURABLY AND DIE before you would water board a **** psychopath laughing at you. You would either water board the **** or you wouldn't. So let it be known. And if you would, but not those putting our troops in harm's way, then you're a plain-*** hypocrite just like Miss T. If you wouldn't, then you're just plain despicable, period. I care about other peoples' kids, including yours. You're in a hotspot now, cannon. Tell it like it is and stop ******-footing around trying to save yourself.

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 6:43 pm » wrote:Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for others.

You just described Obama to a "T".

Inflated sense of their own importance:





A deep need for admiration:





Obama's lack of empathy for others:
Richard Cohen of the Washington Post writes, "at the heart of Barack Obama's foreign policy is no heart at all."

All hell breaking loose at JFK International airport.

The New York Taxi Workers Alliance called for a temporary ban on pick-ups at John F. Kennedy Airport as a protest against President Trump’s ban on refugees from seven Muslim-dominated countries.

The alliance, which represents a wide swath of yellow taxi drivers in New York City, called for a temporary stoppage of pick-ups and drop-offs at JFK between 6-7 PM on Saturday.

Update, January 28th, 7:34PM ET: The mass protest at JFK airport against Trump’s Muslim ban has apparently led police to restrict access to the AirTrain. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which operates the AirTrain, tweeted that it “respects the right to protest,” but is controlling access due to overcrowding conditions.

Update January 28th, 8:13PM ET: The AirTrain shutdown at JFK has apparently been reversed by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, according to the governor’s director of communication director.

And in a statement, Cuomo says he directed the MTA and the New York State Police “to assist with transportation and security needs to ensure the safety of all those participating.”

That may help alleviate some of the tension at JFK right now, but given the size of the crowds and the uncertainty surrounding those who have been detained by customs officials, it will take something much bigger than a working AirTrain to bring calm to the scene.

Cuomo has also ordered the New York State Department of State and his counsel’s office to assist those who have been detained at JFK. “This is not who we are, and not who we should be,” the governor said.

http://www.theverge.com/2017/1/28/14426 ... m-ban-uber

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 8:49 pm » wrote:All hell breaking loose at JFK International airport.

Will this spread? Will I be able to get a slurpee at 7/11?

Huey » 28 Jan 2017 8:55 pm » wrote:Will I be able to get a slurpee at 7/11?

Brilliantly hilarious

crimsongulf » 28 Jan 2017 8:56 pm » wrote: Brilliantly hilarious

Thanks. Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while.

YOu hold your own extremely well and usually come out on top.

Trump insisted his administration was “totally prepared” to carry out the refugee and travel ban, which affects more than 100 million people around the world.

“It’s working out very nicely,” he said. “You see it at the airports, you see it all over.”

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 9:15 pm » wrote:Trump insisted his administration was “totally prepared” to carry out the refugee and travel ban, which affects more than 100 million people around the world.

“It’s working out very nicely,” he said. “You see it at the airports, you see it all over.”

That is not his doing. Those are YOUR snowflakes. Plus, I still see no Muslim ban. I see a ban on travel from specific countries. The left loves to frame the issue.

Banning travel from certain countries is not a first.

larryc12 » 28 Jan 2017 7:20 pm » wrote: Call me all the childish names you want, but you're a despicable human being who would let his daughter SUFFER IMMEASURABLY AND DIE before you would water board a **** psychopath laughing at you. You would either water board the **** or you wouldn't. So let it be known. And if you would, but not those putting our troops in harm's way, then you're a plain-*** hypocrite just like Miss T. If you wouldn't, then you're just plain despicable, period. I care about other peoples' kids, including yours. You're in a hotspot now, cannon. Tell it like it is and stop ******-footing around trying to save yourself.

You ever put me in a hot spot, child, I retire from posting.

First, who puts our troops in harm's way are those who use them as an invading army against the spirit of our Constitution. Two types of folks on our battle fields: Those fighting because they were born there, and those fightng because they were sent there - by a government run by and for bankers. Doesn't take much sense to sort the good guys from the bad.

Our troops are not there for YOUR INTERESTS, you silly girl. If Wall Street did not want them there they would not be there. The last things our misused and put-upon troops need are orders to torture prisoners, infant.

Second, what I might do in your totally imaginary Jack-Off-Bauer situation has nothing to do with what I would willingly empower your precious federal nanny state to do. I can **** my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean I have to let tRump exercise the feudal privilege of prima nocta (Not that I'm saying he would - she isn't a 10).

Third, we already have provisions under existing law for your Jack Bauer masturbation - google "exigent circumstances." We do not need laws codifying into existence the infrastructures for torture, complete with doctors, lawyers, receptionists, cleaners, maintenance workers, torturers, pay scales, officially recognized torture implements, designated tortures areas, instruction manuals detailing accepted tortures, etc., etc.

You assume that if I would torture some guy to prevent my daughter's grisly death, then I must empower your precious federal government to torture others - without even a trial. And you ASSUME these monsters will retire quietly, never having gotten a taste for their grisly profession. What you call for is the opening of Pandora's Box, ya retard - you have not thought your position through.

Little tip for ya, Sparky: Those who excel in the art of torture probably are not going to be people you want for neighbors. As to those who do not, we'll have to deal with the mental issues that putting them to such devil-work produces, ya simple minded hick.

Here's a thought, you stupid ****: LIMITED GOVERNMENT.

Try it on, asswipe.

Huey » 28 Jan 2017 8:55 pm » wrote:
Will this spread? Will I be able to get a slurpee at 7/11?

No I think the dot heads are still allowed to enter the country. All ragheads ain't Muslim.

golfboy » 28 Jan 2017 8:02 pm » wrote: You just described Obama to a "T".

Inflated sense of their own importance:

A deep need for admiration:

Reality never gets in little Miss Marxist's way.

Yeah, but if you were able to stop the oceans from rising and the planet from warming, wouldn't you have an ego, too?

Oh and let's not forget that he brought peace to the world, fully deserving his Nobel Prize.

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2017 11:34 pm » wrote:You ever put me in a hot spot, child, I retire from posting.

First, who puts our troops in harm's way are those who use them as an invading army against the spirit of our Constitution. Two types of folks on our battle fields: Those fighting because they were born there, and those fightng because they were sent there - by a government run by and for bankers. Doesn't take much sense to sort the good guys from the bad.

Well, trying to wiggle out of your hot spot with who puts the troops in harm's way is a failure, cannon. That has nothing whatsoever to do with the situation. That's no different than the girl walking down the street at night alone.

Our troops are not there for YOUR INTERESTS, you silly girl. If Wall Street did not want them there they would not be there. The last things our misused and put-upon troops need are orders to torture prisoners, infant.

Yeah, because **** if they can't take a joke. I care about the kids of other parents who could be saved from horrible death and how they got in the situation or who put them there doesn't matter to me - it does to you - so **** those parents who want their kids to come home to them.

Second, what I might do in your totally imaginary Jack-Off-Bauer situation has nothing to do with what I would willingly empower your precious federal nanny state to do. I can **** my girlfriend, but that doesn't mean I have to let tRump exercise the feudal privilege of prima nocta (Not that I'm saying he would - she isn't a 10).

It's only imaginary if it isn't you having to decide anything.

Third, we already have provisions under existing law for your Jack Bauer masturbation - google "exigent circumstances." We do not need laws codifying into existence the infrastructures for torture, complete with doctors, lawyers, receptionists, cleaners, maintenance workers, torturers, pay scales, officially recognized torture implements, designated tortures areas, instruction manuals detailing accepted tortures, etc., etc.

You assume that if I would torture some guy to prevent my daughter's grisly death, then I must empower your precious federal government to torture others - without even a trial. And you ASSUME these monsters will retire quietly, never having gotten a taste for their grisly profession. What you call for is the opening of Pandora's Box, ya retard - you have not thought your position through.

What I see, not assume, is that you would save YOUR daughter, but not Carl Menard's daughter who will be beheaded at sunrise at the hands of ISIS, because she, in your despicable mind, shouldn't be there in the first place. **** Carl and **** his daughter.

Little tip for ya, Sparky: Those who excel in the art of torture probably are not going to be people you want for neighbors. As to those who do not, we'll have to deal with the mental issues that putting them to such devil-work produces, ya simple minded hick.

Here's a thought, you stupid ****: LIMITED GOVERNMENT.

Here's another thought, you despicable ****: CARE ABOUT PEOPLE BESIDES YOURSELF.

Misty » 28 Jan 2017 6:43 pm » wrote:Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental disorder in which people have an inflated sense of their own importance, a deep need for admiration and a lack of empathy for others.

Why are you jumping dead in cannon's ****?

But behind this mask of ultraconfidence lies a fragile self-esteem that's vulnerable to the slightest criticism.

So you're afraid of criticism from your answer to my question you want to ignore.

larryc12 » 29 Jan 2017 8:24 am » wrote: Here's another thought, you despicable ****: CARE ABOUT PEOPLE BESIDES YOURSELF.

Oh, I see. Let's give the federal government torture powers, for the kids.

So our kids will grow up in a safe country - a free country - a country with limited government. (A government small enough to drown them in a bathtub.)

We HAVE to torture.

We don't want to - we hate it. But we HAVE to.

For the kids.

Cannonpointer » 29 Jan 2017 9:17 am » wrote:Oh, I see. Let's give the federal government torture powers, for the kids.

So our kids will grow up in a safe country - a free country - a country with limited government. (A government small enough to drown them in a bathtub.)

We HAVE to torture.

We don't want to - we hate it. But we HAVE to.

For the kids.

I can't help you being off your rocker. I can't help you not giving a **** about other peoples' kids, either.