Liberal Forum

Try again moonbat. You made a silly mistake. You can post in this thread. I never said I was physically unable to post in this thread dingbat. What I meant was I can't make a post without having to read your insane rantings about it and having you derail the subject. Insane? It's "insane" to leave a thoughtful post about a huge, ugly abortion scandal and the zero lack of MSM coverage of it? Why didn't you comment on that?

There's absolutely no liberal bias in the MSM, insist moonbats. There's only "corporate" bias.Hmmm, why would corporations censor a huge story about the killing of babies, the deaths of female patients and lots of ugly, graphic detail?Still trying to decide what the topic should be in MY thread I see.You're a slow learner aren't you? Insane? It's "insane" to leave a thoughtful post about a huge, ugly abortion scandal and the zero lack of MSM coverage of it? Why didn't you comment on that? Because you don't get to decide what the topic is in my **** thread. What part of that do you not understand? If that is what you want to talk about, start your own damn thread. You are the sickest, craziest MoFo I have ever run across.

Still trying to decide what the topic should be in MY thread I see. You're a slow learner aren't you? Because you don't get to decide what the topic is in my **** thread. What part of that do you not understand? If that is what you want to talk about, start your own damn thread. You are the sickest, craziest MoFo I have ever run across Aha, I understand perfectly. You absolutely won't respond in your thread, because, uh, because your authority is challenged? Hey, that's believable. And you absolutely won't respond if I leave them in other threads because...... Because you're a cowardly moonbat who's afraid to address certain issues, because they're prove you wrong.

Aha, I understand perfectly. You absolutely won't respond in your thread, because, uh, because your authority is challenged? It's no longer my thread.I hereby gift it to you.I have even changed the title to reflect that.Feel free to post whatever you want in this thread from now on.I'm going to start a new one, where if you wish to post, you will stay on the topic of my choosing.

Aha, I understand perfectly. You absolutely won't respond in your thread, because, uh, because your authority is challenged? Hey, that's believable. And you absolutely won't respond if I leave them in other threads because...... Because you're a cowardly moonbat who's afraid to address certain issues, because they're prove you wrong. It's no longer my thread. I hereby gift it to you. I have even changed the title to reflect that. Feel free to post whatever you want in this thread from now on. I'm going to start a new one, where if you wish to post, you will stay on the topic of my choosing. More micro-issues about which you'll beat loudly. While avoiding the most important issues the country faces. Typical liberal-left winger; can't face reality.

Grisly Abortion Clinic Trial Is 'Peek Into The World Before Roe v. Wade'Abortion rights opponents are drawing the wrong lesson from the horrific case of Kermit Gosnell, Ilyse Hogue, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, said Friday.Instead of encouraging more restrictions on reproductive rights, Hogue said, the Gosnell trial should serve as a warning about the consequences of denying women access to safe and affordable abortion care."This is exactly what happens when you place undue restrictions and you try to shame women to keep them from exercising their constitutional right to safe and legal abortions," Hogue told The Huffington Post in an interview. "You make them victims to people like Gosnell, because in their desperation they’ll turn anywhere. You want to drive people like Gosnell out of business? Then you actually support medical facilities and the right of women to safe and legal abortion."Gosnell, a Philadelphia doctor, is currently on trial for performing gruesome and illegal late-term abortions that led to the death of a woman and seven infants. In Pennsylvania, abortions after 24 weeks of gestation (around the time a fetus is viable outside the womb) are against the law, but Gosnell regularly performed the procedure at 30 weeks of gestation or later.Anti-abortion advocates are using the case to bolster support for new restrictions, including TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) laws that impose onerous architectural standards on clinics that perform only first-trimester abortions. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List, implied on Friday that the TRAP laws being pushed by GOP-controlled state legislatures around the country were all directly inspired by the Gosnell case."Since Kermit Gosnell's 'house of horrors' clinic was discovered in 2010, several states have enacted measures to ensure women going into abortion facilities are treated with basic dignity and respect," Dannenfelser said in a statement about Virginia's new abortion clinic regulations.But Hogue argued that the TRAP regulations, which could shut down many safe and legal abortion clinics by requiring them to undergo cost-prohibitive renovations, will actually force women to seek back-alley abortions like the ones performed by Gosnell."Kermit Gosnell’s so-called clinic is a peek into the world before Roe v. Wade," she said, "and this is exactly what our opponents are driving us to."Ilyse Hogue is exactly right. Denying women access to safe and affordable abortion care will only drive the practice underground, and create more butchers like Kermit Gosnell.

i was hoping for a detailed manifesto (kind of like those ******* things they find on Facebook after someone has shot up something saying they were abused, mocked, bullied or chained in a basement). i think LMM could get VERY creative/descriptive... ,,,,,,,, did you notice that butcher's trial is getting very little media coverage? free pass from the liberal media, no?

lol. oh my god...so that's how you all are going to spin this abortionist? sorry. the man was a licensed physician with a legitimate practice. that's not gonna fly whatsoever.

Rich will post in 5.4.3.2.1

I'm going to start by saying that I am against abortion and find it reprehensible. That said, I think you're right. We can't "un-know" how to abort children so we should take a different tack and regulate it, ensuring clean, safe, affordable facilities. I don't want my tax dollars funding these places, but I understand that it is a person's right to choose what they do. Just like they don't want me forcing my choices on them, I don't want it forced on me. Not being a doctor, I can't really say what's considered a viable pregnancy, or one that should be terminated for health reasons. I can't make those decisions nor will I attempt to hazard a guess as to what the correct answer is. Where I draw the line is with multi-abortions, where it's almost used as birth control. If a woman can have a healthy child and chooses to abort, fine. But don't do it more than twice. Once is an oops, twice an aw crap, three times you're just irresponsible. I've posted several times about the butcher. The topic has been beat to death on here. And yes, chickie, he is getting a free pass.

life begins at conception. people who kill babies should be killed the same way they kill the kid. any woman who kills her baby should be sterilized during the process. abortion is murder. The End.

So now shaming women who get an abortion is too much to handle? This is stupid. Shaming people is the only thing one can do, especially in a **** hole like Philly, where abortions are served up more than cheesesteak. They have planned parenthoods there, the women are ignorant for going to this man and if they thought it was shady then leave and go somewhere else. Besides all this nonsense, when are women gonna learn to keep their legs closed and be responsible from themselves and quit blaming someone else for their burden? They say they don't want a man (father) involved in making the legal decision for an abortion, but as soon as something doesn't go their way they want to drag the man who knocked them up into the equation. Talking about, "It takes two to make a baby..." We know that you insatiable whrores, but you are the one who is burdened with the child and you take and want full responsibility when it comes to abortion. So there you go, you got your wish you stupid murdering irresponsible jizz bags of hate.

Snoring loudly.

Grisly Abortion Clinic Trial Is 'Peek Into The World Before Roe v. Wade' Ilyse Hogue is exactly right. Denying women access to safe and affordable abortion care will only drive the practice underground, and create more butchers like Kermit Gosnell. "Before Roe vs. Wade?" Hey moonbat, these grisly procedures are going on right now all around the country. Actual babies being killed. And why wasn't this clinic inspected long ago and shut down? Because "pro-choice" groups prevented that. The liberal-left wants every aspect of Americans' lives to be regulated; business, banking, animal treatment, retail sales, hiring and firing, to cite just a few. What's perhaps the only area they don't want regulated? Abortion and the killing of human life. You people are utterly wacked.

I have abandoned my Flying Monkeys thread due to the incessant rantings of a lunatic who has taken up residence there. How many words of concern or sympathy did little Miss Marxist express over the killed babies? Zero. Gosh, sounds rather lunatic to me.

Speaking of Flying Monkeys, here's this lunacy in pathetic defense of a rapist. Here's a hint Puss.An 'actual real-life rapist' is someone who was convicted of that crime.No, a rapist is someone who COMMITS rape, duuh.

Speaking of Flying Monkeys, here's this lunacy in pathetic defense of a rapist. No, a rapist is someone who COMMITS rape, duuh.You're doing such a great job with your new thread Puss.Really attracting a big crowd.People are storming in here in droves to discuss a 25 year old rape accusation.Isn't it nice to have a place where you can talk about rape to your heart's content?And you wonder why I said that you support rape.You talk about it all day long.You even make jokes about it.Hee, hee, hee, sure, I wish I was the one who first wished you'd be raped by wild dogs. How imaginative.Although you really don't even seem to know what the definition of rape is.....lack of consent does not mean rape.

I'm going to start by saying that I am against abortion and find it reprehensible. That said, I think you're right. We can't "un-know" how to abort children so we should take a different tack and regulate it, ensuring clean, safe, affordable facilities. I don't want my tax dollars funding these places, but I understand that it is a person's right to choose what they do. Just like they don't want me forcing my choices on them, I don't want it forced on me.Not being a doctor, I can't really say what's considered a viable pregnancy, or one that should be terminated for health reasons. I can't make those decisions nor will I attempt to hazard a guess as to what the correct answer is.Where I draw the line is with multi-abortions, where it's almost used as birth control. If a woman can have a healthy child and chooses to abort, fine. But don't do it more than twice. Once is an oops, twice an aw crap, three times you're just irresponsible.That was a very well thought out and reasoned post.I respect your opinion.

I have abandoned my Flying Monkeys thread due to the incessant rantings of a lunatic who has taken up residence there. ******

...when are women gonna learn to keep their legs closed....I don't know, I guess around the same time men learn to keep it in their pants. ****** many times have I told you, if you want some ******, don't ask me in front of everyone.Send me a PM silly.Snoring loudly.Go sleep it off somewhere else.Try Clem's Flying Monkey thread.It's nice and quiet in there.