Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 31 Jan 2017 12:40 pm » wrote:
I was unaware that Rudy worked in the Trump administration, psycho.

When did that happen? Did the little voices in your empty head tell you?

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 12:39 pm » wrote:
Guess again, schmuck:

Donald Trump’s campaign spokeswoman on Monday revised the presumptive Republican nominee’s proposed ban on Muslims entering the U.S. for the second time in three days, saying Trump is dropping the word “Muslim” from the policy and focusing on immigrants from “terrorist nations.”
“It doesn’t matter where you’re coming from, except for fact that the terrorist nations, which is something he is adding to this policy to make it more clear, that if you are coming from a hostile nation and you can not be vetted, absolutely you should not come into this country,” Trump spokeswoman Katrina Pierson said on CNN.
The change to Trump’s proposed ban on Muslims is the second since Saturday, when the campaign said Trump no longer supports a blanket ban on all Muslim immigrants, and wants to single out Muslims from “terror states.” Trump told reporters he “would be fine” with Muslims from Scotland, for example.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/don ... b1bbbbb6cc

That is from june of last year, schmuck.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:39 pm » wrote:One country. Lol.

Not the same thing - especially in context of tRump's specific promise to - and I quote, **** - "ban all muslims from entering this country."

Look, I'm FINE with the ban - you ain't heard me complain. Not a big jew or muslim lover.

What I find a botheration is what an inauthentic, wheedling dick sucker you are.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:45 pm » wrote: since tRump asked him for help, you loud mouthed idiot.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:49 pm » wrote:So, I'm a shmuck for taking your guy at his word, and failing to check the back page of the newspaper for an unnamed spokeswoman's more nuanced version of the promise, Snowflake?

You girls DO believe in your toiletry.

Look, I don't give a **** if muslims are locked out - get the dirty jews out of here, too, and see if I care. Just don't be so **** sensitive about it, PC Princess.

golfboy » 31 Jan 2017 12:50 pm » wrote: Why, because I'm enjoying watching you defend your liberal friends stupidity?

Termin8tor » 31 Jan 2017 12:51 pm » wrote: "Muslim ban." "Muslim ban." "Muslim ban."

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 12:52 pm » wrote: No, you are a schmuck for playing stupid. You know damn well he walked back those comments.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:56 pm » wrote: Muslim ban.

Termin8tor » 31 Jan 2017 12:59 pm » wrote:
And if you say,"presto!" any wish you make will come true!

Imbecile.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:58 pm » wrote:Earlier, you said something about me taking the same tack as Misty - whose posts on this issue I have not yet read.

Seems to me that you, goopti and retard clem are all reading from the same instruction manual.

Your handlers have instructed you to be outraged by the term "muslim ban." Being a good little soldier-tard, here you stand - outraged.

Muslim ban, Muslim ban, Muslim ban.

Also, Muslim ban.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:59 pm » wrote:Muslim ban, gay.

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 12:52 pm » wrote: No, you are a schmuck for playing stupid. You know damn well he walked back those comments.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 1:03 pm » wrote:Allow me to assure you that from this day hence, I shall label the thing tRump's muslim ban, knowing that it is a ban of certain (but far from all) muslims.

And I shall remind you, from time to time, that the one nation which HAS sent terrorists hither is not on the list - thus, if security is in fact A reason for this list, it is not the ONLY reason. If it were, asudi arabia would not get a bye, big boy - yubecha.

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 1:02 pm » wrote:
First and foremost, cupcake, I am not outraged. Most average people understand it is not a muslim ban. Not much that you say outrages me. You ever notice that on one thread you and I can beat the **** out of each other than on the next it is if nothing happened? If i was like rich clem, goofy, rebel, etc, that wouldn't happen.

****, what gets to me more is being compared to clem. LOL!

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 1:08 pm » wrote: You are correct. That one country is not on the list. Apparently the Big O left them off his list and Trump didn't have balls enough to add them.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 1:09 pm » wrote:You ARE drinking water from the same well, son.

I'm a believer in coincidence - but I'm not an idiot. You're getting your talking points somewhere. You didn't wake up with the same bug in your *** they have in theirs, without what SOMEONE put it there.

You need to comprehend that I support tRump keeping his promise. He got elected. Elections have consequences. I have no burning desire to share my nation with **** who think my mom is a dirty whore for wearing pants. It's bad enough I have to put up with you and your kind worshiping jews, who likewise consider my mother less than human - unclean.

So when I say muslim ban, maybe it's just wishful thinking. Or maybe it's a short cut. Or maybe it's laziness. But what it ISN'T is a **** talking point - and i'm not going to change my language to accommodate YOUR talking points.

I absolutely agree that the muslim ban is not really a muslim ban - most muslims are, regrettably, left off the list. But as flawed as the muslim ban is, it's a start.

Muslim ban.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 12:53 pm » wrote:No, gay. Because you're comparing what obama did to a specific country to what tRump is doing. Obama never promised Murka a muslim ban - according to many of you girls, he IS muslim. tRump DID promise a muslim ban, and we all know that the folks he's targeting are being targeted to thwart RADICAL ISLAM.

And that's fine - it's part of what he was hired to do. It' what he promised to do. I'm not a queer like you, who would complain about a man keeping campaign promises, as you did with obama.

But pretending it is a mere continuation of an obama policy is very dick sucker of you, Petunia.

The Dark History of the White House Aides Who Crafted Trump's "Muslim Ban"



The Trump administration has insisted since Sunday that the president's executive order banning travel to the United States from seven predominately Islamic countries "is not a Muslim ban."

But as Mother Jones first reported in a series of investigations starting last summer, the two top Trump advisers who reportedly crafted the immigration crackdown—Stephen Bannon and Stephen Miller—have a long history of promoting Islamophobia, courting anti-Muslim extremists, and boosting white nationalists.

For nearly a year before stepping down as the CEO of Breitbart News to lead the Trump campaign, Bannon hosted a SiriusXM radio show, Breitbart News Daily, where he conducted dozens of interviews with leading anti-Muslim extremists.

Steeped in unfounded claims and conspiracy theories, the interviews paint a dark and paranoid picture of America's 3.3 million Muslims and the world's second-largest faith.

Bannon often bookended the exchanges with full-throated praise for his guests, describing them as "top experts" and urging his listeners to click on their websites and support them.

One of Bannon's guests on the show, Trump surrogate Roger Stone, warned of a future America "where hordes of Islamic madmen are raping, killing, pillaging, defecating in public fountains, harassing private citizens, elderly people—that's what's coming."

Another frequent guest was Pamela Geller, the president of Stop Islamization of America, whom Bannon described as "one of the top world experts on radical Islam and Sharia law and Islamic supremacism."

Geller told Bannon that George W. Bush's description of Islam as a "religion of peace" was something "we all deplore," that there had been an "infiltration" of the Obama administration by radical Muslims, and that former Central Intelligence Director John Brennan may have secretly converted to Islam.

Bannon never pushed back against any of those unfounded claims.
[....]
Miller has long been an advocate of framing the fight against terrorism in religious terms.

In 2007, while an undergraduate at Duke University, he started the Terrorism Awareness Project, an effort to make "students aware of the Islamic jihad and the terrorist threat, and to mobilize support for the defense of America and the civilization of the West."

The group promoted "Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week" on college campuses and took out ads in college newspapers titled, "What Americans Need to Know About Jihad."

After many papers declined to run the ads, Miller appeared on Fox & Friends to discuss the controversy, saying, "How are we going to win a war on terror if we can't even talk about the enemy?"

As a member of the Duke Conservative Union, Miller worked closely with Richard Spencer, a Ph.D. student who would later coin the term "alt-right" and become a leading white nationalist.

Spencer told me that at Duke, Miller helped him with fundraising and promotion for an on-campus debate on immigration policy that Spencer organized in 2007, featuring influential white nationalist Peter Brimelow.