Liberal Forum

Misty » 31 Jan 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: But it's NOT a Muslim ban.

Why is a supposed "moderate" like you citing a wackjob left source like Mother Jones?

Misty » 31 Jan 2017 2:51 pm » wrote:Fox News was quick to imply the Quebec attacker was an Islamic terrorist

Oh my gosh, how dare Fox one single time imply something based on the information available!

Much better that they lie and dissemble and propagandize endlessly for decades like the conservative-hating MSM.

And here we go again.

Thank you to whoever did that.
If you wanted to get rid of one of the last Libs still here, you accomplished your goal.
As long as one of my threads is pinned to the top of the page, I won't be logging in.
Later.

Grow the **** up people. This is getting really tiresome.

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 3:21 pm » wrote:Grow the **** up people. This is getting really tiresome.

You can thank this jackass.

golfboy » 31 Jan 2017 3:31 pm » wrote:Thank God. Who know that reposting Misty's lies would run her off.

Misty » 31 Jan 2017 3:46 pm » wrote: You can thank this jackass.

And the moron doesn't do it to just you, whenever laddie pops in reposts some the tiresome ****. I know you and I had some epic blow outs and we (no I offense, I said we) acted stupidly But ****, not for this long,

Even though I'm ignored, I thought I'd chirp in that I didn't sticky this piece of **** thread, Misty.
My uber-cleverly named dumb thread is extremely mild competition.
An occasional bump of that thread salves my neediness just right.

golfboy » 31 Jan 2017 1:47 pm » wrote: ^^ ******* doesn't know Trump used Obama's list of countries, for this ban.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/29/politics/ ... countries/

^Queer makes up his own "facts."

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 1:29 pm » wrote: The difference is I presented facts to support the "talking point" as well as showing he walked that promise, that I condemned, back. This isn't even close to a muslim ban.

And I am not even close to giving a **** and cannot imagine why YOU do, except that someone instructed you to. And don't even try to deny it - the entire conjob sisterhood has its panties on fire over this non **** issue, all loaded up with arguments against the term muslim ban.

Furthermore, why the **** would you have condemned a full-on ban, ala, "No More Room At The Inn?" Why would you CONDEMN our nation saying sand *** need not apply?

They are from the sand, are they not? They are ***, are they not?

Then they're sand ***, ***.

Y'know what we need up in here?

Muslim ban, ***.

Cannonpointer » 31 Jan 2017 10:56 pm » wrote:And I am not even close to giving a **** and cannot imagine why YOU do, except that someone instructed you to. And don't even try to deny it - the entire conjob sisterhood has its panties on fire over this non **** issue, all loaded up with arguments against the term muslim ban.

Furthermore, why the **** would you have condemned a full-on ban, ala, "No More Room At The Inn?" Why would you CONDEMN our nation saying sand *** need not apply?

They are from the sand, are they not? They are ***, are they not?

Then they're sand ***, ***.

Y'know what we need up in here?

Muslim ban, ***.

Seems fair. We are ALL infidels from a muslim's point of view. Broad brush both sides of the argument.

Huey » 31 Jan 2017 4:42 pm » wrote: And the moron doesn't do it to just you, whenever laddie pops in reposts some the tiresome ****. I know you and I had some epic blow outs and we (no I offense, I said we) acted stupidly But ****, not for this long,

All she has to do is admit she's wrong. But she won't. She isn't capable of intellectual honesty.

golfboy » 02 Feb 2017 10:09 am » wrote:All she has to do is admit she's wrong. But she won't. She isn't capable of intellectual honesty.

Why not go to one of the other forums instead of spamming the forum whenever he or she pops up? It is getting childish and lord knows I know about that.

wtf...not again

Misty » 31 Jan 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: But it's NOT a Muslim ban.

Misty is a foolish progressive that believes all the fake news from the progressives.

http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/the-lefts-wa ... -menacing/

She ignores the fact that the jihadists are following the Koran. Here is surah 9:1-16 and the sword verse is 5.

http://m.clearquran.com

Quran surah 9 1-16
1. A declaration of immunity from God and His Messenger to the polytheists with whom you had made a treaty.
2. So travel the land for four months, and know that you cannot escape God, and that God will disgrace the disbelievers.
3. And a proclamation from God and His Messenger to the people on the day of the Greater Pilgrimage, that God has disowned the polytheists, and so did His Messenger. If you repent, it will be better for you. But if you turn away, know that you cannot escape God. And announce to those who disbelieve a painful punishment.
4. Except for those among the polytheists with whom you had made a treaty, and did not violate any of its terms, nor aided anyone against you. So fulfill the treaty with them to the end of its term. God loves the righteous.
5. When the Sacred Months have passed, kill the polytheists wherever you find them. And capture them, and besiege them, and lie in wait for them at every ambush. But if they repent, and perform the prayers, and pay the alms, then let them go their way. God is Most Forgiving, Most Merciful.
6. And if anyone of the polytheists asks you for protection, give him protection so that he may hear the Word of God; then escort him to his place of safety. That is because they are a people who do not know.
7. How can there be a treaty with the polytheists on the part of God and His Messenger, except for those with whom you made a treaty at the Sacred Mosque? As long as they are upright with you, be upright with them. God loves the pious.
8. How? Whenever they overcome you, they respect neither kinship nor treaty with you. They satisfy you with lip service, but their hearts refuse, and most of them are immoral.
9. They traded away God's revelations for a cheap price, so they barred others from His path. How evil is what they did.
10. Towards a believer they respect neither kinship nor treaty. These are the transgressors.
11. But if they repent, and perform the prayers, and give the obligatory charity, then they are your brethren in faith. We detail the revelations for a people who know.
12. But if they violate their oaths after their pledge, and attack your religion, then fight the leaders of disbelief—they have no faith—so that they may desist.
13. Will you not fight a people who violated their oaths, and planned to exile the Messenger, and initiated hostilities against you? Do you fear them? It is God you should fear, if you are believers.
14. Fight them. God will punish them at your hands, and humiliate them, and help you against them, and heal the hearts of a believing people.
15. And He will remove the anger of their hearts. God redeems whomever He wills. God is Knowledgeable and Wise.
16. Or do you think that you will be left alone, without God identifying which of you will strive, and take no supporters apart from God, His Messenger, and the believers? God is well Aware of what you do.

Note: Muslims believe Christians are polytheists because of the belief in the trinity.

Here is how the start of suicide bombers and killers came about. During a battle going badly he told his troops that if they die fighting infidels they will immediately go to paradise and be served by 72 virgins. Here is a more detailed explanation.

http://www.albatrus.org/english/religio ... d_boys.htm

Mohammed knew that sex would sell very well among the group of his followers who were motivated to fight battles by the promise of sex slaves and booty. By constantly emphasizing to his followers that they would get untouched virgins in Paradise, Mohammed is clearly expressing his "high" opinion of the institution of marriage and his fairness to women. Once the followers go to heaven, they can conveniently ditch their wives for the fresher and more pleasurable sexual encounters with 'Houris' (beautiful virgins). The poor wives who gave up their virginity for the pleasure of their husbands do not get anything. But wait, Allah is all merciful! He gives the wives the rare honour of watching their husbands deflower those 72 Houris (virgins) and 28 young pre-pubescent boys.

Misty » 31 Jan 2017 3:19 pm » wrote:And here we go again.

Thank you to whoever did that.
If you wanted to get rid of one of the last Libs still here, you accomplished your goal.
As long as one of my threads is pinned to the top of the page, I won't be logging in.
Later.

We ran her off!!! Wonderful!!!

Misty » 31 Jan 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: But it's NOT a Muslim ban.

Why no mention of the fact that they're both zionist jews?

Too soon after the holocaust?

The holocaust is the most over-hyped marketing success the world has ever seen. These dirtbags get away with murder - and no one dares utter a peep.

Sgt Bilko » 02 Feb 2017 3:09 pm » wrote:We ran her off!!! Wonderful!!!

We?

You wish.
Better people than you have tried Dildo.

Misty » 02 Feb 2017 6:24 pm » wrote: We?

You wish.
Better people than you have tried Dildo.

I thought you weren't going to log in until the thread was not pinned!! How were you going to work that magic!!!

That was a typical post for you Misty. Utter stupidity!!!

golfboy » 02 Feb 2017 10:09 am » wrote:All she has to do is admit she's wrong. But she won't. She isn't capable of intellectual honesty.

Honesty and Misty are mutually exclusive!!!

She is devoted to the following.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/01/the-lefts ... -menacing/

Sgt Bilko » 02 Feb 2017 10:00 pm » wrote:
I thought you weren't going to log in until the thread was not pinned!! How were you going to work that magic!!!

I had some business to take care of.

Sgt Bilko » 02 Feb 2017 10:00 pm » wrote:That was a typical post for you Misty. Utter stupidity!!!

Look who's talking.
You're as dumb as a **** post.

Sgt Bilko » 02 Feb 2017 10:03 pm » wrote:Honesty and Misty are mutually exclusive!!!
She is devoted to the following.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/01/the-lefts ... -menacing/

Why am I not surprised that you're a WorldNUTDaily reader?