Liberal Forum

How many times have I told you, if you want some ******, don't ask me in front of everyone. Send me a PM silly. Motel 6, 9:30. Bring a raincoat.

Motel 6, 9:30. Motel 6? Is that the best you can do?Bring a raincoat.Why, are you expecting bad weather?How about I bring an umbrella and shove it up your ***?Oh wait, you might enjoy that. LOL

Gosh, still not one single word of sympathy or concern from little Miss Marxist about the killing of babies. Speaks volumes. "Before Roe vs. Wade?" Hey moonbat, these grisly procedures are going on right now all around the country. Actual babies being killed. And why wasn't this clinic inspected long ago and shut down? Because "pro-choice" groups prevented that. The liberal-left wants every aspect of Americans' lives to be regulated; business, banking, animal treatment, retail sales, hiring and firing, to cite just a few. What's perhaps the only area they don't want regulated? Abortion and the killing of human life. You people are utterly wacked.

I have abandoned my Flying Monkeys thread due to the incessant rantings of a lunatic who has taken up residence there. So this will my new home.Just as I did in my other thread, I will use this thread kind of like a blog, to post about a variety of topics that interest me, and vent about them. Of course, as always, I also invite comments from other forum members. ******************************************************************************************** Ilyse Hogue is exactly right. Denying women access to safe and affordable abortion care will only drive the practice underground, and create more butchers like Kermit Gosnell. If you're talking aboutan anti abortionist who has taken up residence there, then you are definitely talking about a lunatic. It's what they do with the time they have because they have no life. People like that are the reason why I am pro choice, and it almost makes me want to support stand your ground laws. People like that are the perfect target for using those laws. As rabid as they are, it would be real easy justifying having to defend yourself from them using deadly force. I hope any woman, parent of a woman, or husband keeps that in mind if you are ever faced with that decision. Exercise your second amendment rights and carry your gun with you to the clinic. It can be very dangerous with the anti abortion thugs whom you may have to protect yourself from.

I don't know, I guess around the same time men learn to keep it in their pants. They're the ones that wanted this "choice" all to themselves, and the man is brought up when things don't go the way they wanted. Women have the babies, they need to be more responsible for their bodies before they start with the "it's my body" responsibility ****.

I don't know, I guess around the same time men learn to keep it in their pants. How many times have I told you, if you want some ******, don't ask me in front of everyone. Send me a PM silly. Go sleep it off somewhere else. Try Clem's Flying Monkey thread. It's nice and quiet in there. There has been and always will be whores in the world....

Gosh, still not one single word of sympathy or concern from little Miss Marxist about the killing of babies.Speaks volumes. Oh, I'm sorry Puss, did I forget to tell you?I'm ignoring you.Why don't you hop on over to my old Flying Monkey's thread?You know the one I gave you?You can talk about anything you want over there, 25 year old rape accusations, the killing of 'literal' babies, the 'roaring' Obama economy, etc.

Speaking of Flying Monkeys, here's this lunacy in pathetic defense of a rapist. You're doing such a great job with your new thread Puss.Really attracting a big crowd.People are storming in here in droves to discuss a 25 year old rape accusation.Isn't it nice to have a place where you can talk about rape to your heart's content?And you wonder why I said that you support rape.You talk about it all day long.The fact remains, you've spent years defending a rapist.Get some help, moonbat.You even make jokes about it.Wow, you're milking that one joke for all its worth.Aren't there any new Democrat rapists you can defend? You must be all broken up over that.Although you really don't even seem to know what the definition of rape is.It's not:Here's a hint Puss.An 'actual real-life rapist' is someone who was convicted of that crime.http://liberalforum....onkeys/page-126Ask a woman who was raped if her rapists was actually a rapist, if he was never convicted.You're seriously demented.

"Before Roe vs. Wade?" Abortions were performed for centuries. Not surprising, considering the fatality rate for women who would give birth.

Oh, I'm sorry Puss, did I forget to tell you? I'm ignoring you. Oh well gosh, then no one else will notice that you haven't written one single word of sympathy or concern about the killing of babies. Duuh.

Oh well gosh, then no one else will notice that you haven't written one single word of sympathy or concern about the killing of babies. Duuh. And I've yet to see a single word of sympathy for all those women who had problematic pregnancies that sometimes resulted in their deaths.

There has been and always will be whores in the world.... Is there such a thing as a male whore? Or would you call him a stud?Yadda, yadda, yadda....Maybe you missed the part where I said I'm ignoring you.

Maybe you missed the part where I said I'm ignoring you. "Head ball breaker." As she runs away on little troll feet. No truth in advertising there.

There has been and always will be whores in the world.... Very true. And an ample amount of men who are willing to take full advantage of that. Good thing the women are the only ones held responsible. *******......

Blah, blah, blah.....

Very true. And an ample amount of men who are willing to take full advantage of that. Good thing the women are the only ones held responsible. *******...... Never done the pay for play. If you have something to lose, no way taking a risk of seeing your name in the Sunday paper. Twat is wunnerfull. Worst I ever had was great, but just ain't worth it.

And I've yet to see a single word of sympathy for all those women who had problematic pregnancies that sometimes resulted in their deaths. We can point fingers at the culprit when someone is aborted, but it's harder to do when a pregnancy goes wrong and the mom dies.

I'm moving on to the next subject now.Apparently that lovable drug addled gasbag, Rush Limbaugh has accused the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, of being 'human shields' for the Democrats.RUSH: They're trying to turn the Newtown parents into a dozen Cindy Sheehan's, in a way. And that's what the Democrats do folks. They always try to hide their agendas behind women and children and most of all victims. And so the Newtown parents are 'Human Shields', in a sense. The Newtown parents are out there to protect the Democrats from any criticism, and to shut it down. Pure and simple.http://dailyrushbo.c...-human-shields/Alex Jones said that Obama is 'pimping out the dead children of Newtown Connecticut'.http://www.mofopolit...-of-sandy-hook/And Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) said that the gun control debate doesn't have anything to do with the families of the Newtown, Conn., shooting victims, and that the only reason those families think it does is because President Barack Obama told them it did."See, I think it's so unfair of the administration to hurt these families, to make them think this has something to do with them when, in fact, it doesn't," Inhofe said.When it was suggested that the families of Newtown victims actually believe the gun debate pertains to them, Inhofe said, "Well, that's because they've been told that by the president."http://www.huffingto..._n_3046969.htmlAh, those compassionate Conservatives.Reminds me of the time that Ann Coulter called the 9/11 widows the 'Witches of East Brunswick' and said that she'd 'never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much'.I guess when a solider's mother or grieving families exercise their 1st Amendment rights, they're less than human to wingnuts like that.

I'm moving on to the next subject now. Apparently that lovable drug addled gasbag, Rush Limbaugh has accused the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, of being 'human shields' for the Democrats. Ah, those compassionate Conservatives. Reminds me of the time that Ann Coulter called the 9/11 widows the 'Witches of East Brunswick' and said that she'd 'never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much'. I guess when a solider's mother or grieving families exercise their 1st Amendment rights, they're less than human to wingnuts like that. Well, if you have to bring up tragedies to back your play on additional laws, then that's pretty pitiful. Where is the talk about philosophy, principles, ethics? Give us something other than an emotional plea based on recent events that support your cause. If this was the case in anything else, it would be all too easy to show instances where lots of other things should be outlawed, banned or have additional regulations.

I'm moving on to the next subject now. Apparently that lovable drug addled gasbag, Rush Limbaugh has accused the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, of being 'human shields' for the Democrats. Ah, those compassionate Conservatives. Reminds me of the time that Ann Coulter called the 9/11 widows the 'Witches of East Brunswick' and said that she'd 'never seen people enjoying their husbands' deaths so much'. I guess when a solider's mother or grieving families exercise their 1st Amendment rights, they're less than human to wingnuts like that. I don't necessarily agree with the way Rush said it, but he's kinda right. Anytime any politician parades victims out to win support for their side, I have a real issue with that. These poor people don't even know their being exploited sometimes. Granted, some really believe they are there for a good reason, but I think politicians are sickening when they do that crap. As far as Coulter goes, some of the widows used that money to the fullest and came back for more. Grouping everyone into the same boat though isn't right either. The problem is the bad few stand out. I've never understood why millions of dollars per family was necessary for the 9-11 victims. Maybe it's me. Same thing with Trayvon Martin's parents. Why do they need anything besides burial costs for their child? It's a very sore spot for me when someone exploits death or the victims' families.