we don't have the cordial and understanding we used to have...i know...the thrill is gone...............and to think all of the...the...the.years i wasted on you#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:10 pm » wrote:tothink
I don't hate you at all.
Lmmfao!#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 5:54 pm » wrote: And you know this for sure, how? I don't know, was he talking to one of our adversaries who was interfering in our election? I don't think I said that it did.
Have you heard the conversation?
Do you really not see the difference between talking to any old country and talking to a country that was meddling in our election on 45's behalf?
Tell me something I don't know.Inglorious Bastards » 17 Feb 2017 6:11 pm » wrote:someone needs to realize something..that...that....that........the russians have been spying on us since the bolshevic revolution..............we have been spying on them since the bolshevic revolution
sssshhhhhhhhhhhh...no one must know...it is tops secrets....shhhhhhhhhh
notkce what she has done here. I am far from stupid. You are doing what your politicians and media are doimg. Conflating the Flynn issue with the hacking issue. Two separate issues. That you want he public to combine. Sorry, you are busted on this one. We were talking about Flynn and sanctions. Not who hacked the DNC. Which according to the FBI and other studies had NO affect on the elections.#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:20 pm » wrote: Tell me something I don't know.
Spying is one thing.
Hacking and leaking to influence an election is quite something different.
First of all whether or not it affected the outcome of the election is something that can never be proven one way or the other, but that's besides the point.Huey » 17 Feb 2017 6:17 pm » wrote:Lmmfao!
Clinton lost the election because of who she is. Let's stop blaming others. Stop conflating two separate issues. One of which was proven not to have effected the election. One of which was the stupidity of the party you support.
#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:31 pm » wrote: First of all whether or not it affected the outcome of the election is something that can never be proven one way or the other, but that's besides the point.
I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the fact that Russia interfered in our presidential election.
Everybody should be outraged by that whether they like the results of the election or not.
soooo...how did putin change the minds of hillary freaks......the election was decided way before#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:20 pm » wrote: Tell me something I don't know.
Spying is one thing.
Hacking and leaking to influence an election is quite something different.
#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:31 pm » wrote: First of all whether or not it affected the outcome of the election is something that can never be proven one way or the other, but that's besides the point.
I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the fact that Russia interfered in our presidential election.
Everybody should be outraged by that whether they like the results of the election or not.
Poor poor Misty is having to try pathetic ideas to try and combat her less than truthful posts!!! Then claiming she is not using a sok in this post!!#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 10:21 am » wrote: That's funny.
If he was doing nothing wrong, then why did he lie about it?
I guess Golfboy was listening in on Flynn's calls, since he seems to know exactly what was said.
Has the FBI cleared him?
GB is too stupid to understand the symbolism of the name change thing.
I am not in hiding.
If I wanted to hide I would have created a sock.
Misty is at it again with half truths and lies!!!#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 12:27 pm » wrote: That's true.
And why did 45 keep the truth from Pence after he was informed that Flynn did in fact discuss the sanctions with Russia?
He was willing to let Pence continue the lie.
If I were Pence, I wouldn't trust my boss.
Flynn wasn't fired because he lied, he was fired because the truth was leaked.
I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the corruption within the DNC when you should be outraged at what was EXPOSED, not who exposed it.#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:31 pm » wrote: First of all whether or not it affected the outcome of the election is something that can never be proven one way or the other, but that's besides the point.
I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the fact that Russia interfered in our presidential election.
Everybody should be outraged by that whether they like the results of the election or not.
He had no need to lie to Pence, so that's a puzzle to me. Can you tell me what he did wrong?Cannonpointer » 17 Feb 2017 12:22 pm » wrote:That's just silly.
Why would aman who did nothing wrogn lie?
You guys need to get on the same page.
Derp.
No government entity was hacked.#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:20 pm » wrote: Tell me something I don't know.
Spying is one thing.
Hacking and leaking to influence an election is quite something different.
Obama sent people and money to Israel to defeat Netanyahu. Were you equally upset over Obama interfering in another country's election?#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:31 pm » wrote:I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the fact that Russia interfered in our presidential election.
Was Misty equally concerned with Jimmah Carter discussing the reduction of our nuclear arsenal with Breshnev PRIOR while HE was President elect, or is Misty a hypocrite?#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 1:48 pm » wrote: How can you declare that there was nothing going on if there is an ongoing investigation?
Flynn was undercutting Obama who was still the POTUS when he put the sanctions into effect.
One president at a time.
Why would Flynn tell Russia not to sweat the sanctions that were put into place because they meddled in our election?
That makes it sound like:
A. They were okay with Russia meddling in our election, or
B. They were colluding with Russia to meddle in our election.
Need the question be asked?golfboy » 18 Feb 2017 11:30 am » wrote:
Or are you only concerned when it hurts a Democrat?
Misty is a brainwashed progressive. She automatically believes anything bad about Trump and Republicans!! Asked for proof she ignores the request.larryc12 » 18 Feb 2017 8:43 am » wrote: I have to wonder why you're so willing to overlook the corruption within the DNC when you should be outraged at what was EXPOSED, not who exposed it.Go ahead, Russia - expose the corruption in the RNC if it's there. I, for one, want to know about it.
Why, not a thing - I am as baffled as you are that he lied for no reason.larryc12 » 18 Feb 2017 9:22 am » wrote:
He had no need to lie to Pence, so that's a puzzle to me. Can you tell me what he did wrong?
Sounds like the kind of hand-off you'd expect from a *** that hates the country.Huey » 17 Feb 2017 12:58 pm » wrote: I have no problem with Trump not saying anything, if in fact he didn't. I am much more troubled by the fact that transcripts were leaked by the intelligence community and the fact that Obama in his last weeks in office expanded the amount of allowable agencies that could receive the raw transcripts. Does any of that trouble you?