Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2017 4:13 pm » wrote:The high pocrisy of the left is not in question - they were more offended by the REVELATION of ugly truths than by those truths, themselves. You tried to talk about the content, they would immediately begin screeching that the russians are interfering - which I'm like, SO? Of COURSE they interfere. WE interfere. Why WOULDN'T they interfere? Who cares? LET them interfere - we still get to decide. The REAL interference in our elections is from wall street, not the kremlin.

But that aside, there is some there, there. Look - see that head?

What's THAT about?

Why, nuttin - is your narrative.

I'm skeptical of your narrative - is mine.

Nothing but my opinion. I give you some greenies for this anyway.

#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 1:19 pm » wrote:
I'm much more troubled by the fact that if not for the leaks we would not know what these clowns are up to.
45 seems to be more than willing to lie to his own VP, Chief Of Staff and Press Secretary.

The selective "I'm troubled" is noted. Such an unashamed hypocrite.

#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 1:48 pm » wrote:
Why would Flynn tell Russia not to sweat the sanctions that were put into place because they meddled in our election?

And you know that he did that, eh? How?

That makes it sound like:
A. They were okay with Russia meddling in our election, or
B. They were colluding with Russia to meddle in our election.

Yeah, it's what it "sounds like" when you don't know what that conversation was.

larryc12 » 19 Feb 2017 8:23 am » wrote: And you know that he did that, eh? How?
Yeah, it's what it "sounds like" when you don't know what that conversation was.

Sounds like the progs are in the creative writing portion of their rehab.

Huey » 19 Feb 2017 8:46 am » wrote:
Sounds like the progs are in the creative writing portion of their rehab.

Creative lying, you mean. It's their most "productive" skill.

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2017 3:29 pm » wrote:Reagan made a side deal the the iranians - same ****. We'll lift the sanctions, end retaliations, give you **** missile technology - just don't let the hostages go on Carter's watch.

Did reagan have to break the law to accomplish that? You bet your ***. He had his sneaky little snake in the basement - ollie north.

Republicans often steal elections with the assistance of foreign governments.

There's the psychotic version of history.

Termin8tor » 19 Feb 2017 9:34 am » wrote:
There's the psychotic version of history.

Well, let's review, cheap little man. Where did I lie?

Here are my claims - DISPUTE ONE, punk:

Reagan lifted all sanctions against iran.
Reagan did not retaliate in any way - unforze their assets.
Little ollie north sold them state of the art missiles. Not just the technology - the missiles themselves.
They released the hostages the day he was inaugurated.

That's not MY version of history, cheap little man. It's HISTORY'S version of history.

Cannonpointer » 18 Feb 2017 3:29 pm » wrote:Reagan made a side deal the the iranians - same ****. We'll lift the sanctions, end retaliations, give you **** missile technology - just don't let the hostages go on Carter's watch.

Did reagan have to break the law to accomplish that? You bet your ***. He had his sneaky little snake in the basement - ollie north.

Republicans often steal elections with the assistance of foreign governments.

Let's say the supposition portion of your post is true. What is trump getting out his alleged deal?

Huey » 19 Feb 2017 9:48 am » wrote: Let's say the supposition portion of your post is true. What is trump getting out his alleged deal?

Beyond cheap labor I have no idea.

Wait.

My new answer: cheap labor.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 9:55 am » wrote:Beyond cheap labor I have no idea.

Wait.

My new answer: cheap labor.

Umm, interesting. Yet, Russia is rumbling militarily, buzzing our ships, and sitting a surface spy ship off of Norfolk, our largest naval base in the world. I doubt it amounts to anything because they would use a sub more than likely but it is there. I doubt it is getting a head start on spring break in Va. Beach,

So, are the acts of a country that wants to deal? Is it a show to deflect attention?

Huey » 19 Feb 2017 10:00 am » wrote: Umm, interesting. Yet, Russia is rumbling militarily, buzzing our ships, and sitting a surface spy ship off of Norfolk, our largest naval base in the world. I doubt it amounts to anything because they would use a sub more than likely but it is there. I doubt it is getting a head start on spring break in Va. Beach,

So, are the acts of a country that wants to deal? Is it a show to deflect attention?

You guys keep assuming that they are **** with us. I see them **** BACK with us.

Why are we doing "maneuvers" in the black sea? Do you understand what "maneuvers" MEANS? It's clear that you don't - very **** clear.

"Maneuvers" means practicing going up against a hostile force.

Guess what.

The force they are lining up and mock-attacking is not India. It's not China.

That's all I'm giving you - two hints.

Tell ya what - let's make a deal. Let's you and me meet up, and I will throw fake punches at you that stop an inch from your face, while using my other hand to pound my chest, making a sound effect to mock having landed the punch. I'll do that over and over, and if you take any offense, I'll call you a trouble maker.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 9:39 am » wrote: Well, let's review, cheap little man. Where did I lie?

I didn't say you lied. I said your claims are psychotic.

Here are my claims - DISPUTE ONE, punk:

Reagan lifted all sanctions against iran.
Reagan did not retaliate in any way - unforze their assets.
Little ollie north sold them state of the art missiles. Not just the technology - the missiles themselves.
They released the hostages the day he was inaugurated.

That's not MY version of history, cheap little man. It's HISTORY'S version of history.

The missiles were non-functional, Dim.

Not to mention that was long, long after Reagan was elected and done for an entirely different reason.

I also question your claim about Reagan lifting sanctions.

But citing a few arguable, cherry picked facts doesn't prove anything, except the the paranoid and psychotic.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 9:39 am » wrote:Well, let's review, cheap little man. Where did I lie?

Here are my claims - DISPUTE ONE, punk:

Reagan lifted all sanctions against iran.
Reagan did not retaliate in any way - unforze their assets.

Got a source for that? I suspect not.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 10:06 am » wrote:You guys keep assuming that they are **** with us. I see them **** BACK with us.

Why are we doing "maneuvers" in the black sea? Do you understand what "maneuvers" MEANS? It's clear that you don't - very **** clear.

"Maneuvers" means practicing going up against a hostile force.

Guess what.

The force they are lining up and mock-attacking is not India. It's not China.

That's all I'm giving you - two hints.

Tell ya what - let's make a deal. Let's you and me meet up, and I will throw fake punches at you that stop an inch from your face, while using my other hand to pound my chest, making a sound effect to mock having landed the punch. I'll do that over and over, and if you take any offense, I'll call you a trouble maker.

Dude, thanks for making my point. Remember, not only did I live the 80s I served thru the 80s. Quite familiar.

As much as the progs want to tie up the election and sanction bundle in a tight little bow it ain't as they want it to appear.

Huey » 19 Feb 2017 10:30 am » wrote: Dude, thanks for making my point. Remember, not only did I live the 80s I served thru the 80s. Quite familiar.

As much as the progs want to tie up the election and sanction bundle in a tight little bow it ain't as they want it to appear.

I didn't make your point - I reminded you of what you seem to have forgotten: the nature of joint military maneuvers.

If you really already are consciously aware of that, then you should also be consciously aware that you're a liar, every time you pretend that we are innocently going about our business and being **** with out of nowhere by a saber-rattling trouble maker.

We are the bully, son - and folks are getting tired of our ****. Do you have a thirst for war - for dead young people from both nations? If not, start owning your knowledge instead of parading it only when called out.

YOU should be the one calling out those who - like yourself - speak as if russia is the trouble maker, a hundred miles off their own **** shores. YOU. Not me.

Termin8tor » 19 Feb 2017 10:20 am » wrote: Got a source for that? I suspect not.

So you dispute none, as you cannot - but presume to give me busy work.

Go **** yourself, cheap little ****.

Termin8tor » 19 Feb 2017 10:14 am » wrote: The missiles were non-functional, Dim.

Gosh.

They were nonfunctional.

Huh.

Wonder why the iranians would purchase non-functional missiles - the sale of which was a felony?

Mmmm...

Maybe the technology?

You little slut butt.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 10:41 am » wrote: Gosh.

They were nonfunctional.

Huh.

Wonder why the iranians would purchase non-functional missiles - the sale of which was a felony?

Mmmm...

Maybe the technology?

You little slut butt.

Great,, great job at utterly missing the point; Reagan swindled them, Dim.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 10:36 am » wrote:I didn't make your point - I reminded you of what you seem to have forgotten: the nature of joint military maneuvers.

If you really already are consciously aware of that, then you should also be consciously aware that you're a liar, every time you pretend that we are innocently going about our business and being **** with out of nowhere by a saber-rattling trouble maker.

We are the bully, son - and folks are getting tired of our ****. Do you have a thirst for war - for dead young people from both nations? If not, start owning your knowledge instead of parading it only when called out.

YOU should be the one calling out those who - like yourself - speak as if russia is the trouble maker, a hundred miles off their own **** shores. YOU. Not me.

Ok.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 10:39 am » wrote: So you dispute none, as you cannot - but presume to give me busy work.

Go **** yourself, cheap little ****.

So you were lying, psychotic or utterly clueless.


Thanks for clearing that up.