Liberal Forum

Huey » 19 Feb 2017 10:48 am » wrote: Ok.

Termin8tor » 19 Feb 2017 10:48 am » wrote: Great,, great job at utterly missing the point; Reagan swindled them, Dim.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 12:30 pm » wrote:I know - you're talking about an entirely different aspect of this elephant - and within the domain you are discussing, you're absolutely right.

Its just that I have a walnut in my *** about this whole Russia topic. We had the Patriarch of Antioch - the very church founded by the Apostles in the Book of Acts - pleading with obama to stop lying that there are "moderates" opposing Assad. ASSAD is the moderate!!!

Amerika is setting up a Christian pogrom which will bring their families suffering and death.

Clinton killed Christians on behalf of Muslims, and now, Obama has been setting up an even worse mass murder. PUTIN is working to SAVE these Christians - and the ******* conjobs on this board were ranting that Obama should "show more strength" to "get Putin's respect."

Presumably, y'all will be aping the same retarded **** about tRump - and celebrating anything he does to destabilize the middle east, bully Putin in his own back yard, etc.

It's gonna blow up in y'all's death worshiping, anti-Christian faces - mark that.

Blacks for Trump’: Meet the serial criminal and conspiracy theorist Trump uses to manufacture racial diversity at rallies.

Donald Trump’s decision to place African American supporters behind him with “BLACKS FOR TRUMP” signs is backfiring in a big way.

During his 2020 campaign rally on Saturday afternoon in Melbourne, Florida, President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump both spoke to a crowd of cheering supporters, while black supporters behind the first couple waved signs that read “BLACKS FOR TRUMP.”

Conservatives on Twitter were giddy at the imagery, as the sign-wavers seemed to be visual evidence that Donald Trump was totally not a racist.

Their t-shirts even said “TRUMP & Republicans Are Not Racist,” with a link to the website Gods2.com.

The only problem? When visiting Gods2.com and blacksfortrump2020.com, visitors are then redirected to the site honestfact.com, which is a crudely designed conspiracy theorist website clearly run by someone who is not mentally stable.

“THE ISHMAELITES ARABS & EAST INDIANS ALWAYS HAD BLACK AMERICAN HEBREWS IN SLAVERY,” reads one post on the site.

The who.is profile for honestfact.com shows that the site is owned by “Micahiel Nichloson,” (Michael Nicholson) and has a North Miami address.

The site also shows videos of Nicholson endorsing Trump and singing the billionaire real estate mogul’s praises in interviews with local TV stations.

What’s not as well-known about Trump’s loudest African American supporter in Florida is that he used to belong to a murderous cult known as “Yahweh Ben Yahweh,” and has a lengthy criminal record.

New York Magazine reported last year about how Nicholson quickly became Republican primary candidates’ favorite black person, being spotted alongside former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum and having the loud endorsement of Glenn Beck due to his extreme views about Barack Obama.

Nicholson also allegedly stabbed someone in the eye, but got away with it:

In the early ‘90s, Michael and 15 other members of the Yahweh ben Yahweh cult were charged with conspiring in two murders, and even though his own brother testified that Michael stabbed a man in the eye with a sharp stick, he was let off by a Florida jury.

In the decades since, he’s become a novel figure in South Florida, racking up criminal charges but no convictions and running a radio show that features his rants on “Demon-crats.”

Labor Secretary nominee Alexander Acosta gave ‘sweetheart deal’ to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein

President Trump’s pick for Labor Secretary is likely to face scrutiny for the “sweetheart” deal he gave to billionaire convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The President named Alexander Acosta as his labor choice Thursday, after previous nominee Andy Puzder backed out over scrutiny of issues including alleged violence in his marriage.

Acosta, the law school dean of Florida International University, is also likely to face controversy for his record as U.S. attorney in Miami from 2005 to 2009.

His office prosecuted Epstein, a billionaire financier who admitted to state charges of soliciting prostitution from a 14-year-old, and signed off in 2008 on the plea deal to not pursue federal charges in exchange for the state pleas.

Epstein served 13 months of an 18-month sentence, though federal statutes against transporting minors for the purposes of sex carry minimum penalties of 10 years.

Two victims in the federal case unhappy with the deal have since sued the feds, saying that their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act had been violated because they had not been in the loop about the details of a plea deal.

A 2014 court filing shows letters from an Epstein lawyer to Acosta in 2007 telling him not to contact the victims in the case, and that lawyers in Acosta’s office waited months after an agreement with the billionaire was reached.

Lawyers for the victims say that the letters show a “conspiracy between the Government and Epstein's attorneys to conceal.”

“There is good reason to believe that if the prosecutors had exposed their dealings to scrutiny by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, they would not have reached such a sweetheart deal,” attorney Bradley Edwards wrote in one filing.

The suit, filed in 2008, is still ongoing, though a settlement conference was held last summer.

“Our judgment in this case, based on the evidence known at the time, was that it was better to have a billionaire serve time in jail, register as a sex offender and pay his victims restitution than risk a trial with a reduced likelihood of success,” Acosta wrote in a 2011 letter, according to the Sun-Sentinel.

The U.S. Attorney's Office in South Florida told the Daily News that it would not comment.

#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:20 pm » wrote: Tell me something I don't know.
Spying is one thing.
Hacking and leaking to influence an election is quite something different.

Sgt Bilko » 19 Feb 2017 3:47 pm » wrote:
Poor Misty is outraged at the hacking and ignores the results of the hacking. The Russian leak showed the Democrats trying to fix the election. They forced the vote count but couldn't overcome the devastating electoral count. I love that failure!!!

#ShePersisted » 19 Feb 2017 3:58 pm » wrote:
Poor Dildo is forced to defend the Russians tampering with our election, because they did it on behalf of his Messiah, Trumpo The Clown.

#ShePersisted » 19 Feb 2017 3:58 pm » wrote: Trumpo The Clown.

#ShePersisted » 19 Feb 2017 3:58 pm » wrote:
Poor Dildo is forced to defend the Russians tampering with our election, because they did it on behalf of his Messiah, Trumpo The Clown.

#ShePersisted » 17 Feb 2017 6:20 pm » wrote: Tell me something I don't know.
Spying is one thing.
Hacking and leaking to influence an election is quite something different.

Cannonpointer » 19 Feb 2017 12:37 pm » wrote: Right. He violated the law to "swindle" them.

It was a technology transfer, you retarded ape. The only thing that "didn't work" is that they had no warheads, you simple minded moron. The missiles were functional. The funds would not have been transferred, and used to maake felonious purchases of weapons for the Contras, if Reagan had "swindled" the Iranians, you vacuous, prattling ape.

The cartoon in your head barely generates intelligible thought bubbles - it's like reading Nancy and Sluggo, or Bazooka Joe.

Termin8tor » 20 Feb 2017 9:15 am » wrote: Yes, Reagan violated likely a number of laws to win the Cold War.

Termin8tor » 20 Feb 2017 9:15 am » wrote:Iran wasn't even close to replicating the technology in those missiles, Dim, so of what use was the technology?

Sgt Bilko » 19 Feb 2017 8:20 pm » wrote: Misty is so ignorant about the Russian hack. They produced the fact from hacking the Democrat website that Democrats were the ones tampering with the election!! Prove me wrong Misty. I know that as usual you will not do it. You never do when challenged!!!

larryc12 » 20 Feb 2017 8:51 am » wrote:Indeed it is, that is IF it influenced the election. You are convinced it did, but you don't back your statements. Let me just ask you some simple questions and see if you bother to answer.

1. Were votes changed by this hacking?

2. If voters in MI, WI, PA, NC, and FL were influenced away from voting in Hillary, why weren't the voters in CA, WA, NY, or IL influenced away from voting in Hillary?

3. You're from PA and if your fellow voters were so influenced, why weren't you and your husband?

Huey » 20 Feb 2017 6:13 am » wrote:Remember, those you cite saying the russians hacked the DNC and Clinton Campaign servers also said it had no effect on voting tendencies. The hacks originally occurred long before trump was in the picture, back in 2015. Also according to the sources you cite. Couple that with the fact you and the left continually brag that Clinton won the popular vote exactly how did this affect the outcome? Tens of thousands, if not millions of voters would have had be influenced.

Additionally no voting system was hacked with votes changed. It is important to note that because the Clinton supporters have been yelling "the Election Was Hacked" giving the impression that the system was manipulated. And the left and the media does nothing to kill that impression.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 9:43 am » wrote: Yes - peaceful democratic nations which refused to embrace wall street style plunder woke up with capitalist guns in their faces. They embraced it THEN.

Funny thing, clem. Reagan's Raiding Rabble murdered so many Salvadorans and Guatemalans and Nicaraguans to "save" them, yet here they are, "saved," sneaking into our country illegally to raise our kids and clean our toilets.

That was some high grade saving, *** - some HIGH grade saving.

Capitalism always brings a gun to the party.

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 1:15 pm » wrote: I never said that any votes were changed by the hacking.
Did it influence the election?
Maybe.

I certainly don't think that the steady drip, drip, drip of emails and the FAKE News stories helped HRC.
Do you?