Liberal Forum

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 1:24 pm » wrote: I never said that any voting systems were hacked, and I've never seen anyone on the left say that.
As to the hacking having an effect on voting tendencies, I don't see how anyone can say definitively that it did not.
That is something that is impossible to quantify.

The point is, that the intention of the hacking was to either influence our election or cause chaos.
And that in itself was wrong.
But people like you, Sgt. Dildo and larry don't seem to think so, or at least can't seem to bring yourselves to say it.
(see my last two posts)

You love the sources you cite when you agree with them but then claim they can't quantify when you disagree. Next, as you guys love to brag Clinton won the popular vote.

Next, you NEVER discuss the corruption contained in the emails. So please, you have no room to lecture me on what I say or don't say.

Termin8tor » 20 Feb 2017 1:34 pm » wrote:


Tanks for reminding me how utterly wacked you are on this topic.

Reagan has been gone for decades, Dim. Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?

Were they afraid Obama would nuke them?

Funny you mention tanks. Capitalism brings THOSE on it's wednesday night visits, as well.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 9:43 am » wrote: Yes - peaceful democratic nations which refused to embrace wall street style plunder woke up with capitalist guns in their faces. They embraced it THEN.

Funny thing, clem. Reagan's Raiding Rabble murdered so many Salvadorans and Guatemalans and Nicaraguans to "save" them, yet here they are, "saved," sneaking into our country illegally to raise our kids and clean our toilets.

That was some high grade saving, *** - some HIGH grade saving.

Capitalism always brings a gun to the party.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 9:43 am » wrote: Yes - peaceful democratic nations which refused to embrace wall street style plunder woke up with capitalist guns in their faces. They embraced it THEN.

Funny thing, clem. Reagan's Raiding Rabble murdered so many Salvadorans and Guatemalans and Nicaraguans to "save" them, yet here they are, "saved," sneaking into our country illegally to raise our kids and clean our toilets.

That was some high grade saving, *** - some HIGH grade saving.

Capitalism always brings a gun to the party.

Blah, blah, blah, blah.

The ranting of an ignorant leftist lunatic.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 9:43 am » wrote:Yes - peaceful democratic nations which refused to embrace wall street style plunder woke up with capitalist guns in their faces. They embraced it THEN.

Funny thing, clem. Reagan's Raiding Rabble murdered so many Salvadorans and Guatemalans and Nicaraguans to "save" them, yet here they are, "saved," sneaking into our country illegally to raise our kids and clean our toilets.

That was some high grade saving, *** - some HIGH grade saving.

Capitalism always brings a gun to the party.

Why didn't you give me a direct answer to my question?

Answer; because you're a disingenuous hack.

Reagan has been gone for decades. Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 1:06 pm » wrote: I don't care if they produced proof that Hillary was diddling little girls.
It's still wrong for any foreign government to meddle in our election.
But you can't bring yourself to say that.
I wonder why?

Wouldn't the Sauds giving her tens of millions rise to that level?

Termin8tor » 20 Feb 2017 2:37 pm » wrote: Why didn't you give me a direct answer to my question?

Answer; because you're a disingenuous hack.

Reagan has been gone for decades. Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?

I am a free marketeer, ***. You are falsely accusing me of hoo-rahing slave pits - that is YOUR bailiwick, fascism supporter.

Capitalism and a free market cannot coexist.

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 1:15 pm » wrote: Like Sgt. Dildo, you can't seem to bring yourself to say that just the act of hacking and leaking by a foreign government was wrong.
Do you believe what Russia did was wrong?
Or do you believe that it was okay because it possibly hurt HRC and helped Trump?

I'll field that.

Any nation on earth has a right - arguably, a duty - to interfere in our elections. Put it under the banner, "Defending the Homeland."

American pResidents are a plague on humanity - manipulating plagues is an entirely correct human option.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 3:11 pm » wrote:I'll field that.

Any nation on earth has a right - arguably, a duty - to interfere in our elections. Put it under the banner, "Defending the Homeland."

American pResidents are a plague on humanity - manipulating plagues is an entirely correct human option.

1. Thanks to the emails we have learned that the Hilary and the DNC did more to influence the elections than groups associated with the Russian government did. Yet misty STILL remains silent on the content of the emails and STILL voted for her. Sorry if her faux outrage does not move me.

2. Our own country had been involved in directly and indirectly affecting the outcome of elections for decades most recently under the stewardship of Obama and Clinton. Israel and France come to mind. This is a case of what goes around comes around.

3. and the bonus question that lib/progs ignore is can you explain the difference between an investigative reporter finding a source that is illegally giving information, like Woodward and Beratein, and a group with all ties to a government? The information leaked was valid information.

See, for misty is was ok for Clinton and the DNC to attempt to influence or steal the election. Because that is who she wanted to win.

Huey » 20 Feb 2017 3:23 pm » wrote:
1. Thanks to the emails we have learned that the Hilary and the DNC did more to influence the elections than groups associated with the Russian government did. Yet misty STILL remains silent on the content of the emails and STILL voted for her. Sorry if her faux outrage does not move me.

2. Our own country had been involved in directly and indirectly affecting the outcome of elections for decades most recently under the stewardship of Obama and Clinton. Israel and France come to mind. This is a case of what goes around comes around.

3. and the bonus question that lib/progs ignore is can you explain the difference between an investigative reporter finding a source that is illegally giving information, like Woodward and Beratein, and a group with all ties to a government? The information leaked was valid information.

See, for misty is was ok for Clinton and the DNC to attempt to influence or steal the election. Because that is who she wanted to win.

The little darling has a point, Misty.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 3:09 pm » wrote: I am a free marketeer, ***. You are falsely accusing me of hoo-rahing slave pits - that is YOUR bailiwick, fascism supporter.

Capitalism and a free market cannot coexist.

Try again, you babbling psycho.

Reagan has been gone for decades. Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?

Poor roadkill.
This will crush him.

Milo Yiannopoulos’s Pedophilia Comments Cost Him CPAC Role and Book Deal

Milo Yiannopoulos, the provocateur and Breitbart News editor, was under pressure on several fronts Monday after the publication of a video in which he condones sexual relations with boys as young as 13 and laughs off the seriousness of pedophilia by Roman Catholic priests.

The organizers of the Conservative Political Action Conference rescinded their invitation for him to speak later this week.

Simon & Schuster said it was canceling publication of his forthcoming book, “Dangerous.”

And there were calls online for Breitbart to sever ties with him.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 3:35 pm » wrote:The little darling has a point, Misty.

And I'm sure he would have felt the same way if it was the RNC and Trump that were on the receiving end of the hacking.

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 4:59 pm » wrote: And I'm sure he would have felt the same way if it was the RNC and Trump that were on the receiving end of the hacking.

We will never know. Apparently, according to your sources, an attempt was made but unsuccessful.

Be that as it may your comment is a diversion from the points all Clinton voters avoid. Try again.

Obviously, influencing elections is not really your concern.

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 4:59 pm » wrote: And I'm sure he would have felt the same way if it was the RNC and Trump that were on the receiving end of the hacking.

lofl

Termin8tor » 20 Feb 2017 4:37 pm » wrote:
Try again, you babbling psycho.

Reagan has been gone for decades. Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?

Again, queer, you are the one who defends socialism.

You were crowing about the state owned medical care in one of your favorite slave pits only recently - and defending that paradise's government ownership of the mass media.

I am a free market guy, *** wipe - YOU are the one who defends state licensed oligarchs having monopolistic control of the markets, socialist *** wipe.

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 9:43 am » wrote:Yes - peaceful democratic nations which refused to embrace wall street style plunder woke up with capitalist guns in their faces. They embraced it THEN.

Funny thing, clem. Reagan's Raiding Rabble murdered so many Salvadorans and Guatemalans and Nicaraguans to "save" them, yet here they are, "saved," sneaking into our country illegally to raise our kids and clean our toilets.

That was some high grade saving, *** - some HIGH grade saving.

Capitalism always brings a gun to the party.

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 1:06 pm » wrote: I don't care if they produced proof that Hillary was diddling little girls.
It's still wrong for any foreign government to meddle in our election.
But you can't bring yourself to say that.
I wonder why?

I take it you never read what the hack of the Democratic Party site exposed??

It was the Democrats that were meddling in the election!!!

Cannonpointer » 20 Feb 2017 5:22 pm » wrote:Again, queer, you are the one who defends socialism.

You were crowing about the state owned medical care in one of your favorite slave pits only recently - and defending that paradise's government ownership of the mass media.

I am a free market guy, *** wipe - YOU are the one who defends state licensed oligarchs having monopolistic control of the markets, socialist *** wipe.

You're a liar and a babbling psychotic and a coward who stonewalls questions.

Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?


Where's the "gun" pointed at their heads?

Termin8tor » 20 Feb 2017 10:24 pm » wrote:
You're a liar and a babbling psychotic and a coward who stonewalls questions.

Why hasn't Eastern Europe gone back to your glorious Socialism?

Where's the "gun" pointed at their heads?

I'm a free market advocate, dick sucker.

Eastern Europe was threatened with the world's largest arsenal of missiles ever built when they "chose" capitalism - and were under the communist boot when they "chose" communism, you *** crack.

They've not been free ever and are not free now. Every move they make is made between russia on one side and western europe on the other, with the full knowledge that their countries are ground zero for the resolution of any disputes between those two power houses.

You've asked me three times to defend socialism, and I have declined three times, you dick sucking midget - you are starting to seem deliberately rude.

#ShePersisted » 20 Feb 2017 1:15 pm » wrote: I never said that any votes were changed by the hacking.
Did it influence the election?
Maybe.

All you have is "maybe" and seize on that "maybe" as if it's more than "maybe". You're jumping right in with the MSM to attempt delegitimizing the election.

I certainly don't think that the steady drip, drip, drip of emails and the FAKE News stories helped HRC.
Do you?

Nice try, Miss T.

Like Sgt. Dildo, you can't seem to bring yourself to say that just the act of hacking and leaking by a foreign government was wrong.
Do you believe what Russia did was wrong?
Or do you believe that it was okay because it possibly hurt HRC and helped Trump?

I've already stated - to YOU - that we can't have other countries fooling around in our elections, but here you are asking me again if I think it's ok. But as far as exposing corruption, I invite ANYONE to expose corruption in the RNC just the same. Your sour grapes are all you have.