Liberal Forum

Sgt Bilko » 05 Mar 2017 5:07 pm » wrote:


I suggest you read your post and try to find actual facts instead of possibly facts. But then character assassination without actual facts is your theme about Trump.

#ShePersisted » 05 Mar 2017 11:10 pm » wrote:Former Trump Adviser Roger Stone Admits Collusion With WikiLeaks, Then Deletes It

Roger Stone, a confidant to President Donald Trump and former adviser to his campaign, acknowledged late Saturday that he had a “back channel” to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, amid mounting reports that multiple advisers to Trump’s campaign had undisclosed communication with Russian officials.

”Never denied perfectly legal back channel to Assange who indeed had the goods on #CrookedHillary,” Stone wrote Saturday night.

Stone later deleted the tweet, along with several other offensive tweets, including posts where he called various women “fat [and] stupid” and “you stupid ignorant ugly bitch.”

#ShePersisted » 05 Mar 2017 11:26 pm » wrote: I suggest you apply that standard to your Circus Peanut Messiah who engages in 'alternative facts' constantly.

He spent over 5 years assassinating the character of President Obama by saying he was an illegitimate president and now without any proof at all, he is accusing him of committing a crime.

Conservative Mark Levin on Obama Wiretapping: “Trump Is the Victim – These Are Police State Tactics!” (Video)
Jim Hoft Mar 5th, 2017 9:13 am 76 Comments
Mark Levin: “Trump Is the Victim – These Are Police State Tactics”
Conservative author and radio host weighed in on the Obama wiretapping scandal Sunday morning on FOX and Friends Weekend.
Levin told the panel, “Trump is the victim… These are police state tactics.”
https://youtu.be/R2ZyHbDGJS0

Conservative Treehouse released a timeline of the unlawful spying by the Obama administration on the opposition party’s candidate in Trump Tower.
The list includes the revelation that the Obama administration continued to spy on Trump Tower and opposition party after October even after no evidence was found of wrongdoing.
1. June 2016: FISA request. The Obama administration files a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several advisers. The request, uncharacteristically, is denied.
2. July: Russia joke. Wikileaks releases emails from the Democratic National Committee that show an effort to prevent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) from winning the presidential nomination. In a press conference, Donald Trump refers to Hillary Clinton’s own missing emails, joking: “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 e-mails that are missing.” That remark becomes the basis for accusations by Clinton and the media that Trump invited further hacking.
3. October: Podesta emails. In October, Wikileaks releases the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new mini-scandals. The Clinton campaign blames Trump and the Russians.
4. October: FISA request. The Obama administration submits a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. No evidence is found — but the wiretaps continue, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National Review later notes. The Obama administration is now monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.
5. January 2017: Buzzfeed/CNN dossier. Buzzfeed releases, and CNN reports, a supposed intelligence “dossier” compiled by a foreign former spy. It purports to show continuous contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, and says that the Russians have compromising information about Trump. None of the allegations can be verified and some are proven false. Several media outlets claim that they had been aware of the dossier for months and that it had been circulating in Washington.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03 ... ics-video/
Adams, a former Department of Justice official, agreed.
"That's exactly right," he said. "There's a big difference between 'ordered' and knowing everything else about it."


"If this happened," he explained, "folks need to understand, this is what the tactics of a police state are—to use intelligence gathering services against political opponents. If this happened, we've crossed a very dangerous line in America. It makes Watergate look like a joke." He reminded viewers that the "Watergate" scandal involved bugging the office of a secretary with 1950s-era hardware.
"Americans are going to learn what the Deep State is," Adams warned, "because that intelligence information about Mike Flynn, his conversations with the Russians...it got out into the Washington Post. That's exactly how it is working in a very dangerous fashion when intelligence operations are becoming political weapons." He added that this is all part of a deliberate campaign being engineered to "smear and delegitimize" President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions and to hamstring the administration.
https://youtu.be/RL9_6T4Jlgs
https://pjmedia.com/video/j-christian-a ... ke-a-joke/

#ShePersisted » 04 Mar 2017 10:06 am » wrote: The FBI is looking into Russian ties between Trump's former campaign director Paul Manafort and the Russian government, so why would it be so far-fetched for Trump's name to be mentioned in a FISA warrant?
I will when you prove that Obama tapped Trump's phone.

In an appearance on Meet the Press Sunday, Clapper said that while his investigation this winter found that Russia tried to influence the election in Trump's favor "there was no evidence" of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.'
http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2007096

DONALD TRUMP’S WORST DEAL

The President helped build a hotel in Azerbaijan that appears to be a corrupt operation engineered by oligarchs tied to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard.

Trump partnered with an Azerbaijani family that U.S. officials called notoriously unethical.

Ivanka Trump was the most senior Trump Organization official on the Baku project.

#ShePersisted » 06 Mar 2017 12:08 pm » wrote: Of course.
They don't care where the money comes from.

#ShePersisted » 06 Mar 2017 12:08 pm » wrote: Of course.
They don't care where the money comes from.

Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2017 12:54 pm » wrote: You mean the Clinton's, right psycho?

Who sold political access and favors to foreign governments and Special Interests?

Never saw you complain about them.

GOP Congressman demands Trump declassify any evidence that supports Obama wiretap claim.

Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) demanded that President Donald Trump declassify any evidence he has that former President Barack Obama wiretapped him at Trump Tower.

In an interview, Monday with CNN’s Erin Burnett, Stewart, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, said that he knows of no evidence that this claim is true.

Still, he called on Trump to provide some kind of evidence to support the claim.

“On the issue of wiretapping, the president could clear this up so quickly, if there’s proof he knows about it,” Burnett said.

“If a request to wiretap him came, he has the ability to declassify that request, he could that right now and that would mean you, me, the if the request exists why isn’t he declassifying it and letting us all see the classified information?”

Stewart agreed with her premise, saying that he thinks the quicker the evidence comes out the better.

“If the president has information and he could declassify that without endangering national security, I would encourage him to do that,” Stewart continued.

“We’re left doing our work and doing the very best we can to answer these questions for the American people.”

Stewart also came to the defense of FBI Direct James Comey, calling him “one of the finest men in government.”

If Obama ordered a wiretap it would have been through the FBI and Comey would have knowledge of it.

However, Comey announced it never happened and asked the Department of Justice to come out against the claim.

#ShePersisted » 06 Mar 2017 6:50 pm » wrote:45's buddy, the CEO of the National Enquirer David Pecker, is at it again.

#ShePersisted » 06 Mar 2017 7:03 pm » wrote:GOP Congressman demands Trump declassify any evidence that supports Obama wiretap claim.

He's losing his own side.

He started off the morning tweeting about the number of former Guantanamo Bay detainees who have who reengaged in battle.

“122 vicious prisoners, released by the Obama Administration from Gitmo, have returned to the battlefield.

Just another terrible decision!”

Trump’s comment came about a half hour after Fox News tweeted out a story about the subject.

Trump incorrectly blamed former President Obama for releasing the prisoners, however, It was actually under former President George W. Bush’s watch that 113 of the 122 were released, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarko ... a-n2295136

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 10:46 am » wrote:Why all the recent attacks on President Obama?
Methinks someone is jealous.
Aside from Obama having a bigger crowd at his inauguration, higher approval ratings and much bigger 'hands' there's this..........

Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2017 6:29 am » wrote: Liar.

Termin8tor » 06 Mar 2017 6:29 am » wrote:Conservative Mark Levin.........

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2017 10:53 am » wrote:Is this the best you can do?
Dim, it's Obama and officials who are in deep, deep trouble.
Even the liberal MSM are beginning to turn on them.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2017 10:53 am » wrote:There is "NO EVIDENCE" of collusion between Trump, his officials and Russia according to the NYTimes and many sources.

Termin8tor » 07 Mar 2017 10:53 am » wrote:Now the question is, on what legal grounds was there extensive surveillance of Trump and his officials? Good luck explaining that.

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 11:31 am » wrote: You mean the FAKE News Liberal left MSM?


You mean what Trump calls the 'fake and failing' New York Times?
I love when you wingnuts dismiss the Times when it publishes stories that are inconvient for you but use it as a source when it suits you.

First of all you don't know that there was 'extensive' surveillance or any surveillance at all.
Secondly, if there was surveillance, that would mean that a court found probable cause to grant a warrant.

Or maybe you believe that Obama himself broke into Trump's office at Trump Tower and 'tapped his wires.'

roadkill » 07 Mar 2017 11:33 am » wrote: Clapper said there were no FISA warrants.

So where did the press get the leaks?