Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 04 Mar 2017 6:56 am » wrote:
Judge Napolitano expressed the strong opinion that Sessions was answering the question in the context of talking about campaign issues to the Russians;

that Sessions did not commit perjury.

But a Democrat Talking Point Liar will lie and lie and lie and lie and lie.........

Well, if an entertainer says it, I guess we have to believe it!

Termin8tor » 04 Mar 2017 6:58 am » wrote:You cannot violate someone's Constitutional rights on that basis, Dim.

Especially not with yet another illegal, unConstitutional Obama action.

You should do a little research before opening your piehole.

They waive their rights when they throw themselves on the mercy of the state and beg for freebies, entitlement breath.

If your OWN POSITION is that you're too damaged to manage your care, chances are you can't be trusted to vote or own a weapon.

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2017 3:12 pm » wrote:Well, if an entertainer says it, I guess we have to believe it!

At least you don't hide your leftist values anymore.


Thanx bud.

larryc12 » 04 Mar 2017 7:43 am » wrote:
Oh, well gee....the SSA. Nothing but a government agency deciding who can have firearms and who can't, who has this "severe mental disorder"...based on irrelevant factors no less. Tell me, how many of these "incompetents" have been shooting people?


No matter, it's PEOPLE making judgments...and based on what? And what assures you that "bad dreams" doesn't equate to a "severe mental disorder" so judged by some **** government power grabber?

Maybe you ought to THINK past your NOSE before getting behind government ****.

THEY are the ones saying they're incompetent.

The SSA is merely taking their word for it, entitlement breath.

Jason Chaffetz: Americans May Have To Choose Between New Phone, Health Insurance.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) on Tuesday morning brushed off concerns about the access low-income Americans will have to health insurance with Republicans' plan to replace Obamacare, arguing that Americans will just have to choose between a new phone and health insurance.

"Americans have choices. And they've got to make a choice.

And so maybe rather than getting that new iPhone that they just love and they want to go spend hundreds of dollars on that, maybe they should invest in their own health care."

FYI Jason Chaffetz, low-income Americans do make choices.
It's not iPhones or health care.
It's food or health care.
Or rent or health care, you jackass.

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 3:26 pm » wrote: FYI Jason Chaffetz, low-income Americans do make choices.
It's not iPhones or health care.
It's food or health care.
Or rent or health care, you jackass.

Not many choices without your party approving of it...which has the poor in the worst neighborhoods in dem run cities.

Trump says he never met this Russian billionaire — but their jets keep mysteriously crossing paths.

Five days before the November election, a Russian billionaire's jet wheeled to a stop at Charlotte Douglas International Airport.

Less than 90 minutes later, Donald Trump's campaign jet arrived on the same tarmac for an afternoon campaign rally in nearby Concord.

Rybolovlev's plane was also in Las Vegas briefly on the same day as Trump, Oct. 30th, 2016.

Trump says he never met this Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev who he coincidently sold a Palm Beach mansion to for $95 million in 2008.

Rybolovlev's plane has also made trips to Washington DC, New York and Palm Beach, Florida.

And Rybolovlev traveled to Dubrovnik, Croatia at a time when Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner just happened to be vacationing in that same city.

He must be one of those billionaire stalker guys.

Trump administration wants to make cuts to the Coast Guard, TSA and FEMA to pay for crackdown on illegal immigration.

The Trump administration wants to gut the Coast Guard and make deep cuts in airport and rail security to help pay for its crackdown on illegal immigration, according to internal budget documents reviewed by POLITICO — a move that lawmakers and security experts say defies logic if the White House is serious about defending against terrorism and keeping out undocumented foreigners.

The Office of Management and Budget is seeking a 14 percent cut to the Coast Guard's $9.1 billion budget, the draft documents show, even as it proposes major increases to other Department of Homeland Security agencies to hire more border agents and immigration officers and construct a physical barrier along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Great.
They should start by eliminating the Coast Guard vessels that guard his house in Florida.

Overall, DHS would get a 6 percent boost to its budget, to $43.8 billion.

But to help pay for that, the administration would slice the budget of the Coast Guard and cut 11 percent in spending from the TSA — reductions that critics say would weaken safeguards against threats arriving by sea or air.

OMB also wants to cut 11 percent from the budget of FEMA, which oversees the national response to disasters such as floods and hurricanes.

Well, terrorists will be boarding planes, and people hit with disasters will be **** out of luck, but look at the bright side.
We won't have to deal with any of those pesky Mexicans.

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2017 3:16 pm » wrote:THEY are the ones saying they're incompetent.
The SSA is merely taking their word for it, entitlement breath.

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 4:18 pm » wrote:

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 4:18 pm » wrote:

Due Process anyone? You progs remember due process, correct? Still stand for that, correct?

roadkill » 07 Mar 2017 3:15 pm » wrote: At least you don't hide your leftist values anymore.

Thanx bud.

Seems you're the one quoting celebrities, nanny stater.

Huey » 07 Mar 2017 4:46 pm » wrote: Due Process anyone? You progs remember due process, correct? Still stand for that, correct?

Guy walks into a bar, orders a drink. Is the bartender depriving him of due process if he doesn't consult a jury before he gives it to him?

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2017 5:02 pm » wrote:Guy walks into a bar, orders a drink. Is the bartender depriving him of due process if he doesn't consult a jury before he gives it to him?

Lmao!! What road paved with **** is cannon going down now?

Additionally, due process is the portion of the story Misty fails to mention. That was the major reason the directive was overturned. To make it worse Obama did this without congress. That is why it us getting overturned in the review process.

Now pops you can go with misty' s hyperbolic talking points or you can go with the truth.

Unless you want the president to have the power to remove your rights without congress or due process.

Huey » 07 Mar 2017 5:44 pm » wrote:
Lmao!! What road paved with **** is cannon going down now?

Additionally, due process is the portion of the story Misty fails to mention. That was the major reason the directive was overturned. To make it worse Obama did this without congress. That is why it us getting overturned in the review process.

Now pops you can go with misty' s hyperbolic talking points or you can go with the truth.

Unless you want the president to have the power to remove your rights without congress or due process.

I don't want any pube-headed buffalo soldier doing anything more than he's already done.

Obama has my IMMENSE respect for not quitting his job and running out on his family, which was what I believed he would when I voted for him (Have I mentioned I hate the country? No matter - others have). I was also blown away when we didn't have to forcibly evict him and his niglets from the white house - I mean, how many of your coloreds give a **** what's on their credit report?

If it's getting overturned, and the overturning re-enfranchises ANYONE, then I'm with the overturners - full stop. As a general rule, there's no need for me to educate myself before commenting, because I can usually pick the right side of any issue with my eyes closed and my dick out. That comes from being well traveled, highly (self) educated, and part Irish (with a German half to keep the poet in check and to keep an eye on the dirty jews).

But this seems to be that rare exception that proves the rule - like how those two dicks I sucked prove how hetero I am.

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 2:35 pm » wrote:
Report: Trump's assertion of Obama wiretapping may increase impeachment odds.

Here's a second lawyer saying the same thing.

Constitutional expert Laurence Tribe says Donald Trump can be impeached for false Obama wiretap claim.

Trump’s accusation of lawless wiretap by Obama, unlike the racist claims Trump made as a private citizen about Obama’s birth, was made by Trump as POTUS, with strong suggestion he had ‘just learned’ in that capacity about Obama’s alleged crime, was a grave abuse of power of presidency to slander a private citizen as well as a former president, an abuse I’d classify as a high crime against the nation and one of its most distinguished citizens.

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 6:49 pm » wrote: Here's a second lawyer saying the same thing.

Very, very interesting. I cuss jews, yell fire in crowded theaters, say ***, make absolutely outrageous and false claims about my previous relationship with Brad Pitt (call me, Brad - angelina is a skank and I can make you forget her) - all kinds of hinky ****.

But never at work. NEVER.

Okay, once. But I was fired.

Okay, half a dozen times - always fired.

Your source is correct. A great office is not made for petty, vindictive, dishonest behavior in plain sight. It's made for that stuff behind the scenes. tRump is **** up. He needs to put on his big pResident pants and stop being a sniveling, thin skinned, PANDERING, dishonest ****.

Huey » 07 Mar 2017 5:44 pm » wrote:Now pops you can go with misty' s hyperbolic talking points or you can go with the truth.

Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it the Republican mantra that tighter control of mentally troubled individuals, not stronger gun control, is the better way to deal with the mass shootings?

I could swear they say that after every mass shooting.

Cannonpointer » 07 Mar 2017 6:57 pm » wrote:tRump is **** up. He needs to put on his big pResident pants and stop being a sniveling, thin skinned, PANDERING, dishonest ****.

Yeah, good luck with that.

#ShePersisted » 07 Mar 2017 6:59 pm » wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't it the Republican mantra that tighter control of mentally troubled individuals, not stronger gun control, is the better way to deal with the mass shootings?

I could swear they say that after every mass shooting.

Tight controls on loony toons characters is one thing - but taking their guns away is a little over the top, doncha think?

Andy Taylor had it right. Gun, Barney? No problem. But one bullet - and in the pocket.