Liberal Forum

New studies undercut the ‘scientifically empty’ warming narrative, says astrophysicist and aerospace engineer.Leading voices in the climate community are in an uproar as their warming hypothesis comes under fresh assault by new scientific papers.The authors of the papers are being attacked and say that “activist scientists” threatened by the new findings are “aggressively conducting an orchestrated disinformation campaign to discredit the papers and the scientific reputation of the authors.”Indeed, from insults on social media and furious blog posts to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests demanding emails from a journal editor and federal scientist, the controversy is getting heated.

“The response by Schmidt, Mann, and others, particularly with regard to the FOIA request regarding editorial discussions on this paper, reflects their ongoing attempts to control the scientific as well as public dialogue on climate change,” she told The Epoch Times. “In my opinion, their behavior not only reflects poorly on them but is damaging to climate science.”Mr. Soon, the main author of the paper and a principal with the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES), explained that the three new papers by CERES scientists are a major threat to powerful vested interests.“For over three decades, the claims and conclusions by U.N. IPCC reports reigned supreme, unquestioned and unchallenged,” Mr. Soon, who was previously with the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told The Epoch Times. “Our latest series of three published papers show that those claims are scientifically empty.

https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/10/12 ... s-is-over/

OUCH!
 

ROG62 » 15 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm

New studies undercut the ‘scientifically empty’ warming narrative, says astrophysicist and aerospace engineer.Leading voices in the climate community are in an uproar as their warming hypothesis comes under fresh assault by new scientific papers.The authors of the papers are being attacked and say that “activist scientists” threatened by the new findings are “aggressively conducting an orchestrated disinformation campaign to discredit the papers and the scientific reputation of the authors.”Indeed, from insults on social media and furious blog posts to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests demanding emails from a journal editor and federal scientist, the controversy is getting heated.

“The response by Schmidt, Mann, and others, particularly with regard to the FOIA request regarding editorial discussions on this paper, reflects their ongoing attempts to control the scientific as well as public dialogue on climate change,” she told The Epoch Times. “In my opinion, their behavior not only reflects poorly on them but is damaging to climate science.”Mr. Soon, the main author of the paper and a principal with the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES), explained that the three new papers by CERES scientists are a major threat to powerful vested interests.“For over three decades, the claims and conclusions by U.N. IPCC reports reigned supreme, unquestioned and unchallenged,” Mr. Soon, who was previously with the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told The Epoch Times. “Our latest series of three published papers show that those claims are scientifically empty.

https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/10/12 ... s-is-over/

OUCH!

Nothing says science like trying to silence and censor any dissent viewpoints or research.  

Str8tEdge » 15 Oct 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 5:57 pm

Nothing says science like trying to silence and censor any dissent viewpoints or research.

when scientists become activists, science fails...

we see it with Covid...
we see it with CC...

Str8tEdge » 15 Oct 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 5:57 pm

Nothing says science like trying to silence and censor any dissent viewpoints or research.

Hey pal, science brought us COVID and transexuals. 
So, shut the **** up...

We can now expect the left to post endless charts, tables, links, and graphs to which even they don't know what the hell any of it says. 

ROG62 » 15 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm

New studies undercut the ‘scientifically empty’ warming narrative, says astrophysicist and aerospace engineer.Leading voices in the climate community are in an uproar as their warming hypothesis comes under fresh assault by new scientific papers.The authors of the papers are being attacked and say that “activist scientists” threatened by the new findings are “aggressively conducting an orchestrated disinformation campaign to discredit the papers and the scientific reputation of the authors.”Indeed, from insults on social media and furious blog posts to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests demanding emails from a journal editor and federal scientist, the controversy is getting heated.

“The response by Schmidt, Mann, and others, particularly with regard to the FOIA request regarding editorial discussions on this paper, reflects their ongoing attempts to control the scientific as well as public dialogue on climate change,” she told The Epoch Times. “In my opinion, their behavior not only reflects poorly on them but is damaging to climate science.”Mr. Soon, the main author of the paper and a principal with the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES), explained that the three new papers by CERES scientists are a major threat to powerful vested interests.“For over three decades, the claims and conclusions by U.N. IPCC reports reigned supreme, unquestioned and unchallenged,” Mr. Soon, who was previously with the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told The Epoch Times. “Our latest series of three published papers show that those claims are scientifically empty.

https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/10/12 ... s-is-over/

OUCH!
 

there is something you left out. Legal precedence. It is legislated into social regulations now so it won't ever go away.

Str8tEdge » 15 Oct 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 5:57 pm

Nothing says science like trying to silence and censor any dissent viewpoints or research.

And another thing...   

https://youtu.be/E1e5HAZo4iw?si=xDlORoRQOYtfxY7G

Nostradamus'omh » 16 Oct 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2023, 9:14 am

there is something you left out. Legal precedence. It is legislated into social regulations now so it won't ever go away.

social regulations change at the drop of a hat...nothing is written in stone...
 

ROG62 » 15 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 3:15 pm

New studies undercut the ‘scientifically empty’ warming narrative, says astrophysicist and aerospace engineer.Leading voices in the climate community are in an uproar as their warming hypothesis comes under fresh assault by new scientific papers.The authors of the papers are being attacked and say that “activist scientists” threatened by the new findings are “aggressively conducting an orchestrated disinformation campaign to discredit the papers and the scientific reputation of the authors.”Indeed, from insults on social media and furious blog posts to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests demanding emails from a journal editor and federal scientist, the controversy is getting heated.

“The response by Schmidt, Mann, and others, particularly with regard to the FOIA request regarding editorial discussions on this paper, reflects their ongoing attempts to control the scientific as well as public dialogue on climate change,” she told The Epoch Times. “In my opinion, their behavior not only reflects poorly on them but is damaging to climate science.”Mr. Soon, the main author of the paper and a principal with the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Sciences (CERES), explained that the three new papers by CERES scientists are a major threat to powerful vested interests.“For over three decades, the claims and conclusions by U.N. IPCC reports reigned supreme, unquestioned and unchallenged,” Mr. Soon, who was previously with the solar and stellar physics division of the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, told The Epoch Times. “Our latest series of three published papers show that those claims are scientifically empty.

https://www.climatedepot.com/2023/10/12 ... s-is-over/

OUCH!

So, you're saying we are now experiencing global cooling?  QUICK, WE NEED TO STOP BLOWING SO MUCH CARBON INTO THE ATMOSPHERE - ITS REFLECTING TOO MUCH SUNLIGHT AND SOON, IT WILL BE COLD AND OUR SOLAR CELLS WON'T WORK!!!
 

ROG62 » 16 Oct 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2023, 10:13 am

social regulations change at the drop of a hat...nothing is written in stone...
 

Why not? Rhetorical question since I have been suggesting how evolving has always been misinterpreted by humans since dawn of civilization preying on their own kind cradle to grave.

There are two universal constants that are physically absolute in how they operate in plain sight of each lifetime occupying space now.

Molecular content and chromosome results. Stone erodes and lifetime decompose after dead always were changing form since a fertilized cell.

ROG62 » 15 Oct 2023, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2023, 8:01 pm

when scientists become activists, science fails...

we see it with Covid...
we see it with CC...

Excellent observation.

Every "scientific study" on the hoax of man-made climate change should include everyone who paid for the study or it will remain unqualified.  I know first-hand in my own business how any "study" is eager to provide the precise results that their customer wants to see.

The most important thing in any research center is to keep the money flowing to them, and they do it by giving the kind of response the payer wants to see, simply because they know how gullible liberals are!
EVERY.  ****.  TIME!  
 

DeezerShoove » 16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

16 Oct 2023, 9:37 am

And another thing...   

https://youtu.be/E1e5HAZo4iw?si=xDlORoRQOYtfxY7G

 
"IT'S TOO HOT OUTSIDE
FOR ME TO HAVE TITTIES"