That doesn't sound fair, if the species has to correct its ancestral behaviour than that wouldn't be freedom of choice, everyone would be forced to accept that now is eternity... but a conversation requires two sides, you are the one male and everyone else is dishonest and corrupt.. so what would an honest conversation about evolving in plain sight look like, it can't have happened yet?Nostradamus'omh » 20 Oct 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ Every legal system serving humanities will not allow an honest conversation about evolving in plain sight without consequences in civil or criminal court.
this doesn't mean every society has to be torn down to the ground either. It means this species has to correct its historical behavior to this point of evolving forward in plain sight now.
There is no freedom of choice when ancestors are only given an either/or neither/nor 4 corner triatulating optional social proposition used against them after picking a one sided narrative thinking beyond living limited to eternally separated as ancestrally here.Jantje_Smit » 20 Oct 2023, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ That doesn't sound fair, if the species has to correct its ancestral behaviour than that wouldn't be freedom of choice, everyone would be forced to accept that now is eternity... but a conversation requires two sides, you are the one male and everyone else is dishonest and corrupt.. so what would an honest conversation about evolving in plain sight look like, it can't have happened yet?
:faint:
I'm trying to figure out what a 4 corner triatulating optional social proposition would be but I'm not having much luck.. lol.. but my point is that if everyone accepted that now is eternity there wouldn't a freedom of choice either because the new ancestors couldn't pick a one sided narrative anymore if they wanted to..Nostradamus'omh » 20 Oct 2023, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ There is no freedom of choice when ancestors are only given an either/or neither/nor 4 corner triatulating optional social proposition used against them after picking a one sided narrative thinking beyond living limited to eternally separated as ancestrally here.
Stay in character or else every reality will contract around your time evolving here in plain sight to eliminate you from humanities. why clowns are so scary. they are the distraction for the next main event.Jantje_Smit » 20 Oct 2023, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ I'm trying to figure out what a 4 corner triatulating optional social proposition would be but I'm not having much luck.. lol.. but my point is that if everyone accepted that now is eternity there wouldn't a freedom of choice either because the new ancestors couldn't pick a one sided narrative anymore if they wanted to..
:blink:
Hmm, as you say, I like clowning around and having fun with reality but clowns still scare me.. you're evading the question again though, if everyone would be honest and accepted that now is eternity how could there still be freedom of choice, what's left to choose from then?Nostradamus'omh » 20 Oct 2023, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Stay in character or else every reality will contract around your time evolving here in plain sight to eliminate you from humanities. why clowns are so scary. they are the distraction for the next main event.
I am not the one evading how evolving works in plain sight when naturally occupying time as specifically reproductively here, now.Jantje_Smit » 21 Oct 2023, 4:55 am » wrote: ↑ Hmm, as you say, I like clowning around and having fun with reality but clowns still scare me.. you're evading the question again though, if everyone would be honest and accepted that now is eternity how could there still be freedom of choice, what's left to choose from then?
:faint:
No one could evolve in plain sight if now was eternity, you have been hacked as a hackable animal species (carbon units) of a neo feudal monarchy because evolution theory is anything and everything except individual contract negotiation capability, bill of rights, constitutional freedoms, property ownership, freedom of self employment, freedom of travel, free speech,Nostradamus'omh » 20 Oct 2023, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑ Every legal system serving humanities will not allow an honest conversation about evolving in plain sight without consequences in civil or criminal court.
this doesn't mean every society has to be torn down to the ground either. It means this species has to correct its historical behavior to this point of evolving forward in plain sight now.
yet here it happens genetics eternally separating the sequence of compounding DNA combinations as 8 billion replacements occupying time inhabiting space making realities happen on a world stage it isn't happening as specifically behaving by choice within one species each generation society creates the narratives ancestors choose to die for pretending life exceeds their time adapting to the moment here.
No, but you are evading how not evading how evolving works in plain sight removes a freedom of choice too..Nostradamus'omh » 21 Oct 2023, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ I am not the one evading how evolving works in plain sight when naturally occupying time as specifically reproductively here, now.
doesn't remove freedom of choice, limits the choices free to choose from, lesser of two necessary evils each generation gap ancestries preserves traditional values life exceeds the moment here same ideology throughout history.Jantje_Smit » 21 Oct 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ No, but you are evading how not evading how evolving works in plain sight removes a freedom of choice too..
:blink: