I watched the clip and didn't see any mention of "monitoring porn intake" at all.maineman » 06 Nov 2023, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So the new Speaker of the House and his 17-year-old son monitor each other's online porn intake?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mike-johnson ... 28238.html
You Republicans really know how to pick 'em!
The confirmed Neocon Pedonuckinfutz » 06 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ We need to monitor Buck Naked's porn intake!![]()
@Buck Naked
who is we?nuckinfutz » 06 Nov 2023, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑ We need to monitor Buck Naked's porn intake!![]()
@Buck Naked
Us, them, the whole world is watching!
yikes
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sumela » 06 Nov 2023, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Posted about a 12yo girl....
"""""""she has dick sucking lips"""""
Buck is as diseased as HUNTER
maineman » 06 Nov 2023, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So the new Speaker of the House and his 17-year-old son monitor each other's online porn intake?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mike-johnson ... 28238.html
You Republicans really know how to pick 'em!
The term "porn intake" is not a term the speaker used. A "journalist" assigned it that term, and it is a dishonest term. It implies that the "accountability partners" are watching porn, when the whole thing is geared to PREVENT them watching porn.maineman » 06 Nov 2023, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So the new Speaker of the House and his 17-year-old son monitor each other's online porn intake?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mike-johnson ... 28238.html
You Republicans really know how to pick 'em!
Or about his doper children incriminating him for influence peddling and molesting his daughter. His own son refers to him as pedo pete.Vegas » 06 Nov 2023, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ It's definitely creepy. Then again, so is the senile pedo sniffing 11yr old girls hair, but lefties don't want to talk about that of course.
Cannonpointer » 06 Nov 2023, 11:12 pm » wrote: ↑ The term "porn intake" is not a term the speaker used. A "journalist" assigned it that term, and it is a dishonest term. It implies that the "accountability partners" are watching porn, when the whole thing is geared to PREVENT them watching porn.
And yes - it's **** creepy. But we live in a creepy world, and keeping your teen from becoming flaccid from over-exposure to extreme porn is probably a good idea. As I understand it, young men are bombarded with porn, and they become addicted to it - and they need to keep upping the ante in order to maintain the same level of excitement.
And I know exactly how that goes. You think I could jack off to a Sears Catalogue TODAY? No, sir. But when I was a teen, that thing was my go to. Now I'm strictly into puppy snuff and bunny rape. Just watching some broad get gang raped by angry mexican midget wrestlers in costume with foreign objects is ho-hum.
how you voting..... On right to repair.maineman » 06 Nov 2023, 11:46 pm » wrote: ↑ As much as I try to be indignant about your posts, you invariably strike the right tone to bring a smile to my face. Thanks.
Joe Biden (D)maineman » 06 Nov 2023, 7:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So the new Speaker of the House and his 17-year-old son monitor each other's online porn intake?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mike-johnson ... 28238.html
You Republicans really know how to pick 'em!
He gets upset when I confront him about his porn intake.Z09 » 07 Nov 2023, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑ Ask Maineman about the Democrat that admitted he was having sex with teen age boys....
And he was reelected 6 times...