To start this off with ideologies don't talk, ancestors acting them out into a predetermined tomorrow speaks about anything other than how genetics sustains eternal separation of actual reproductions native to this atmosphere and anyone defying social consensus will be eliminated on moral grounds, legal precedence, ethical situation scenarios, defined as insubordinate to rule of law, traitor to the political beliefs, and blasphemy against intellectual minds serving a higher plane than physical forms occupying time now.
Even with adults, I disagree. I say community standards should prevail - be a flagrant cock at your peril.impartialobserver » 16 Nov 2023, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ In general, I agree. Certain settings.. there should be some limits. Examples would be sunday school at a church or a kindergarten classroom. As for adults.. I would say open the flood gates.
simple correct ways to evolve and improper ways to evolve that affect everyone evolving in series parallel time genetics keeps the living eternally separated so far.Cannonpointer » 16 Nov 2023, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Even with adults, I disagree. I say community standards should prevail - be a flagrant cock at your peril.
I have lived in San Francisco California and I have visited Paris Texas.
My public behavior in the one and my public behavior in the other were informed by CONTEXT.
The idea the Framers had was for lots of different cultures to exist on these shores. They never foresaw a one-size-fits-all form of government emanating from an all-powerful national capitol. They saw LOCAL governments as preferable in the defense and service of liberty. For there to BE lots of different cultures, there must perforce be lots of different cultural norms.
There is no reason I can see why the citizens of Paris Texas ought to be forced to comport in public in the same manner as folks in San Francisco, or why the folks in San Francisco ought to have to observe the cultural norms of Paris Texas.
The entire IDEA of multi-culturalism is at odds with the mono-culture today's left seeks to enforce from DC.
censorship for all female bats.Sumela » 16 Nov 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Screechy **** Haley
calling for online censorship.
Big Govt NeoLibs are creepy. She serves AIPAC & MIC.
https://nypost.com/2023/11/14/news/nikk ... dentities/
I saw that, there's something seriously wrong with that one.. I agree with the ending..Sumela » 16 Nov 2023, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Screechy **** Haley
calling for online censorship.
Big Govt NeoLibs are creepy. She serves AIPAC & MIC.
https://nypost.com/2023/11/14/news/nikk ... dentities/
Mob rule tyranny making democracies as tyrannical as dictatorships. Only separation is Pronoun, I and/or we say so.Cannonpointer » 16 Nov 2023, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Even with adults, I disagree. I say community standards should prevail - be a flagrant cock at your peril.
I have lived in San Francisco California and I have visited Paris Texas.
My public behavior in the one and my public behavior in the other were informed by CONTEXT.
The idea the Framers had was for lots of different cultures to exist on these shores. They never foresaw a one-size-fits-all form of government emanating from an all-powerful national capitol. They saw LOCAL governments as preferable in the defense and service of liberty. For there to BE lots of different cultures, there must perforce be lots of different cultural norms.
There is no reason I can see why the citizens of Paris Texas ought to be forced to comport in public in the same manner as folks in San Francisco, or why the folks in San Francisco ought to have to observe the cultural norms of Paris Texas.
The entire IDEA of multi-culturalism is at odds with the mono-culture today's left seeks to enforce from DC.