If you retweeted or liked any of Trump's tweets

User avatar
By *rippy38
29 Nov 2023 1:15 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
11 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
*rippy38
29 Nov 2023 1:15 pm
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
Congratulations... you made Jack Smith's watch list.

Tell me how this isn't using the power of the DOJ to target your political opposition.

You can't, because that's exactly what this is.

Image
 

Special Counsel Jack Smith Sought Info On Anyone Who ‘Favorited Or Retweeted’ Trump Tweets

Special Counsel Jack Smith hunted information on X users who liked or retweeted posts published by former President Donald Trump, according to redacted search warrants and other documents released Monday.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/11/29/sp ... mp-tweets/
 
 
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
User avatar
Str8tEdge
29 Nov 2023 1:16 pm
User avatar
Emperor of the Pheasants
Emperor of the Pheasants
1,734 posts
RedheadedStranger » 29 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: Congratulations... you made Jack Smith's watch list.

Tell me how this isn't using the power of the DOJ to target your political opposition.

You can't, because that's exactly what this is.

Special Counsel Jack Smith Sought Info On Anyone Who ‘Favorited Or Retweeted’ Trump Tweets

Special Counsel Jack Smith hunted information on X users who liked or retweeted posts published by former President Donald Trump, according to redacted search warrants and other documents released Monday.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/11/29/sp ... mp-tweets/

Well, any Twitter accounts I had at that time got banned.  :rofl:   :rofl:   :rofl:  
User avatar
nuckin futz
29 Nov 2023 1:43 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
5,726 posts
RedheadedStranger » 29 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: Congratulations... you made Jack Smith's watch list.

Tell me how this isn't using the power of the DOJ to target your political opposition.

You can't, because that's exactly what this is.

Image

Special Counsel Jack Smith Sought Info On Anyone Who ‘Favorited Or Retweeted’ Trump Tweets

Special Counsel Jack Smith hunted information on X users who liked or retweeted posts published by former President Donald Trump, according to redacted search warrants and other documents released Monday.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/11/29/sp ... mp-tweets/
According to NY Post!!! RWNJ tainted site! :evil:   :evil:   :evil:  
Image
 
 
User avatar
*rippy38
29 Nov 2023 1:49 pm
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
nuckinfutz » 29 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: According to NY Post!!! RWNJ tainted site! Image   Image   Image  
Image
Duh duh...

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67 ... /#entry-22

LOL
 
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
User avatar
Mrkelly
29 Nov 2023 1:51 pm
User avatar
      
7,647 posts
RedheadedStranger » 29 Nov 2023, 2:15 pm » wrote: Congratulations... you made Jack Smith's watch list.

Tell me how this isn't using the power of the DOJ to target your political opposition.

You can't, because that's exactly what this is.

Image

Special Counsel Jack Smith Sought Info On Anyone Who ‘Favorited Or Retweeted’ Trump Tweets

Special Counsel Jack Smith hunted information on X users who liked or retweeted posts published by former President Donald Trump, according to redacted search warrants and other documents released Monday.

https://thefederalist.com/2023/11/29/sp ... mp-tweets/
Will Elon give it up?
Image
User avatar
*rippy38
29 Nov 2023 1:54 pm
User avatar
CYNICAL OLD CUSS
13,058 posts
Mrkelly » 29 Nov 2023, 2:51 pm » wrote: Will Elon give it up?
From the article...

According to the Post, Smith’s warrant was issued to then-Twitter “along with a nondisclosure order, instructing the company not to notify Trump about the search.” Twitter initially bucked Smith’s demand, arguing that to forfeit such information to the government constituted a violation of the First Amendment. The social media giant ultimately complied with the warrant but was fined $350,000 for failing to meet the special counsel’s demands by deadline.

 
Sounds like he already did.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
User avatar
Sumela
29 Nov 2023 1:55 pm
User avatar
      
27,808 posts
I agree, Murica is a

Banana Republic.
User avatar
Mrkelly
29 Nov 2023 1:57 pm
User avatar
      
7,647 posts
RedheadedStranger » 29 Nov 2023, 2:54 pm » wrote: From the article...

According to the Post, Smith’s warrant was issued to then-Twitter “along with a nondisclosure order, instructing the company not to notify Trump about the search.” Twitter initially bucked Smith’s demand, arguing that to forfeit such information to the government constituted a violation of the First Amendment. The social media giant ultimately complied with the warrant but was fined $350,000 for failing to meet the special counsel’s demands by deadline.

Sounds like he already did.
I guess they did

not surprised 
 
Image
User avatar
sunburn
29 Nov 2023 7:20 pm
User avatar
     
1,548 posts
nuckinfutz » 29 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm » wrote: According to NY Post!!! RWNJ tainted site! Image   Image   Image  
Image
a tree falls in the woods and you're at home, does the tree make any sound?
User avatar
Sumela
29 Nov 2023 7:41 pm
User avatar
      
27,808 posts
Snowden tried to warn us. But of course,

the *** Neocons did what they do....

throw themselves on WASH DC in protection...


Image
Buck Naked
29 Nov 2023 8:04 pm
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
11,777 posts
I don’t tweet
11 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 2638 users online :: 12 registered, 11 bots, and 2615 guests
Bots: Not, proximic, DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, Applebot, CriteoBot, ADmantX, Googlebot, curl/7
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search