Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Tucker Carlson on John Kerry
Tucker Carlson on John Kerry
By Tempest62
4 Dec 2023 7:17 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 posts • Page 1 of 1
4 Dec 2023 7:17 pm
Ep. 44 Another half-demented 80-year-old yelling about things he doesn’t understand. These are our leaders. They don’t care about our future because they don’t have one of their own.
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/statu ... 2783130053
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/statu ... 2783130053
4 Dec 2023 7:23 pm
4 Dec 2023 7:25 pm
I saw an article on that this morning...feckless POS they are...Sumela » 04 Dec 2023, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑ China and India will do as they please.
WASH DC can lick sacks.
https://www.ntd.com/biden-admin-signs-n ... m0Sg%3D%3D
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
4 Dec 2023 7:55 pm
WORD. They seek to punish the average family and make us payROG62 » 04 Dec 2023, 8:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I saw an article on that this morning...feckless POS they are...
https://www.ntd.com/biden-admin-signs-n ... m0Sg%3D%3D
for their elitist authoritarian control fantasies.
4 Dec 2023 7:58 pm
4 Dec 2023 8:29 pm
RUSSIA WITH THE PERFECT BALANCE OF COAL, OIL AND GAS USE.Sumela » 04 Dec 2023, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑ China and India will do as they please.
WASH DC can lick sacks.
THE MOST USE WITH THE CLEANEST BURNING FUEL TOO.
4 Dec 2023 8:31 pm
Friend, climate change is not fake.
Its simply not MAN MADE...thats silly ****.
The earth endured 5 ice ages before
man had ever found anal sex and blowjobs.
4 Dec 2023 8:36 pm
WORD!righteous » 04 Dec 2023, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ RUSSIA WITH THE PERFECT BALANCE OF COAL, OIL AND GAS USE.
THE MOST USE WITH THE CLEANEST BURNING FUEL TOO.
Putin and the Duma care about the people.
I watch YT vids where they talk about having
power bills of like 20$ and 15$ cell ph bills.
Its why Russia just passed Germany in 'GDP-PPP'...
...what money actually buys in a given country.
4 Dec 2023 8:44 pm
CORRECT. KERRY KNOWS IT AS WELLSumela » 04 Dec 2023, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Friend, climate change is not fake.
Its simply not MAN MADE...thats silly ****.
The earth endured 5 ice ages before
man had ever found anal sex and blowjobs.
BURNING FOSSIL FUELS LIKE NATURAL GAS, OIL AND COAL DOES NOT AFFECT CLIMATE CHANGE YET YOU WILL FIND ARTICLES, LIKE SOME IN NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC WHO ARE PAID BY BIG GREEN NEW DEAL COMPANIES TO LIE AND SAY THEY DO AFFECT THE ENVIRONMENT
4 Dec 2023 9:15 pm
Great post! I was calling the cult anti-human ten years ago - I have no doubt that guy was, too. It is refreshing to finally see a talking head saying it out loud: The people are in a cult, they preach pseudo-science, and they are misanthropes intentionally attacking human civilization. It isn't ignorance and it isn't well intended. They want to murder 13 out of 14 humans in the great reset, and they are busy little beavers.Tempest62 » 04 Dec 2023, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Ep. 44 Another half-demented 80-year-old yelling about things he doesn’t understand. These are our leaders. They don’t care about our future because they don’t have one of their own.
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/statu ... 2783130053
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Dec 2023 9:18 pm
Well, climate and change are just two words that cannot avoid each other. But so are climate and stability.Sumela » 04 Dec 2023, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Friend, climate change is not fake.
Its simply not MAN MADE...thats silly ****.
The earth endured 5 ice ages before
man had ever found anal sex and blowjobs.
Both are writ large in the history of the climate. The pace of the change is stable - the change is of course inevitable, change being the only constant.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
4 Dec 2023 9:22 pm
Yes sir. And the earth slowly adapts and flourishes.Cannonpointer » 04 Dec 2023, 10:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, climate and change are just two words that cannot avoid each other. But so are climate and stability.
Both are writ large in the history of the climate. The pace of the change is stable - the change is of course inevitable, change being the only constant.
5 Dec 2023 6:06 am
Here is another take on why intermittent "renewable energy" is absolutely unworkable. The Manhattan Contrarian article is lengthy but well worth the read as it is a different take on the non-viability of the "renewable energy" of wind and solar.
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blo ... -their-own
From the article:
"And the bottom line is:
The storage capacity needed to align power generation from solar or wind is around 25% of the annual energy consumption.
In other words, you need three months worth of storage to try to make this work. Previous studies that I highlighted in my energy storage Report — for example, those of Roger Andrews and Ken Gregory — had calculated storage needs in the range of one to two months. However, those studies only used one year’s worth of data for each calculation, and allowed running the storage balance right down to zero. If you think that it’s too risky to run the storage right down to zero before the balance starts to refill, then three months of storage is a much more reasonable figure. Indeed, it’s still rather conservative.
Fekete, et al., don’t get into the specifics of cost of any possible storage solution. But then, they don’t need to. The potential costs are so enormous as to completely rule out any attempt even to start down this road. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, total U.S. electricity consumption in 2022 was just over 4 trillion kWh. So one-quarter of that would be just over 1 trillion kWh. Just to get an idea of the cost of that much energy storage, this site (Tesla fans) gives a (highly optimistic) cost for Tesla batteries of just over $100 per kWh. So a trillion of those will run you about $100 trillion. That’s four times the entire U.S. economy. Meanwhile, a Tesla-style battery is not remotely up to the job of the energy storage needed to back up wind/solar electricity generation, which would necessarily include the ability to save up power over a year or more and discharge over a year. But then, the economics are so wildly out of line that it’s hardly worth worrying about such technicalities.
Fekete, et al., in a very understated manner, put it this way:
In the absence of energy storage technology that can store several months worth of energy, one has to conclude that all studies suggesting that solar or wind are price competitive with other forms of energy should be retracted."
https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blo ... -their-own
From the article:
"And the bottom line is:
The storage capacity needed to align power generation from solar or wind is around 25% of the annual energy consumption.
In other words, you need three months worth of storage to try to make this work. Previous studies that I highlighted in my energy storage Report — for example, those of Roger Andrews and Ken Gregory — had calculated storage needs in the range of one to two months. However, those studies only used one year’s worth of data for each calculation, and allowed running the storage balance right down to zero. If you think that it’s too risky to run the storage right down to zero before the balance starts to refill, then three months of storage is a much more reasonable figure. Indeed, it’s still rather conservative.
Fekete, et al., don’t get into the specifics of cost of any possible storage solution. But then, they don’t need to. The potential costs are so enormous as to completely rule out any attempt even to start down this road. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, total U.S. electricity consumption in 2022 was just over 4 trillion kWh. So one-quarter of that would be just over 1 trillion kWh. Just to get an idea of the cost of that much energy storage, this site (Tesla fans) gives a (highly optimistic) cost for Tesla batteries of just over $100 per kWh. So a trillion of those will run you about $100 trillion. That’s four times the entire U.S. economy. Meanwhile, a Tesla-style battery is not remotely up to the job of the energy storage needed to back up wind/solar electricity generation, which would necessarily include the ability to save up power over a year or more and discharge over a year. But then, the economics are so wildly out of line that it’s hardly worth worrying about such technicalities.
Fekete, et al., in a very understated manner, put it this way:
In the absence of energy storage technology that can store several months worth of energy, one has to conclude that all studies suggesting that solar or wind are price competitive with other forms of energy should be retracted."
5 Dec 2023 8:07 am
Sumela » 04 Dec 2023, 9:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Friend, climate change is not fake.
Its simply not MAN MADE...thats silly ****.
The earth endured 5 ice ages before
man had ever found anal sex and blowjobs.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
5 Dec 2023 8:17 am
The best lecture pertaining to CC, Covid and other pseudosciences is from Michael Crichton had to say about “scientific consensus” back in 2003 when he gave a lecture at the California Institute of Technology titled “Aliens Cause Global Warming” (emphasis mine):righteous » 04 Dec 2023, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑ CORRECT. KERRY KNOWS IT AS WELL
BURNING FOSSIL FUELS LIKE NATURAL GAS, OIL AND COAL DOES NOT AFFECT CLIMATE CHANGE YET YOU WILL FIND ARTICLES, LIKE SOME IN NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC WHO ARE PAID BY BIG GREEN NEW DEAL COMPANIES TO LIE AND SAY THEY DO AFFECT THE ENVIRONMENT
https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/michael- ... s-science/I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had.Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science, consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
15 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 6386 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 6360 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, ConservativeWave, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: NING, SiteLockSpider, LCC, YandexBot, ADmantX, proximic, DuckDuckBot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot