Why not switch one testical with one ovary of a female sibling. Everyone wishes to be the opposite gender of their birth so lets recreate the natural process into realities people give up being naturally here and build societies promising life exceeds the moment left adapting here one at a time in.
While I find that proposal of yours intriguing, it is the radical feminists who are far more responsible for Communist-Leftism than males. Young men just want ******. Young women have agendas.
I'm not sure any democrat has testicles.Skans » 11 Dec 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ While I find that proposal of yours intriguing, it is the radical feminists who are far more responsible for Communist-Leftism than males. Young men just want ******. Young women have agendas.
"tomorrow"? there's no tomorrow there's just today. there's no today. for i am old. can't even remember the moment. "sarcasm" requires foundation or awareness? i have neither. just something. i think.Nostradamus'omh » 11 Dec 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Why not switch one testical with one ovary of a female sibling. Everyone wishes to be the opposite gender of their birth so lets recreate the natural process into realities people give up being naturally here and build societies promising life exceeds the moment left adapting here one at a time in.
You may be projecting sarcasm but your contextual soul will do anything to make it feel really possible tomorrow..
That's a very valid point. From "free stuff" to "gender dystopia".
You playing the "Im 94 years old" **** again. Doesn't matter if you were just conceived or died 300 years ago, your time evolving was specifically you inhabiting space fixed in your own skin since conceived to dead each ancestor gets from inception of your ancestral lineage to extinction of the species your ancestral lineage was subjectively in contextually described between brains minding hypothetical scenarios living isn't self evident.walkingstick » 11 Dec 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑ "tomorrow"? there's no tomorrow there's just today. there's no today. for i am old. can't even remember the moment. "sarcasm" requires foundation or awareness? i have neither. just something. i think.
women are insecure with their appearance and with "what other people think' of them...it's their Achilles Heel.Skans » 11 Dec 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ While I find that proposal of yours intriguing, it is the radical feminists who are far more responsible for Communist-Leftism than males. Young men just want ******. Young women have agendas.
Men are simply born with the propensity for confidence. We have physical strength and testosterone which gives (most of) us courage.nefarious101 » 11 Dec 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑ women are insecure with their appearance and with "what other people think' of them...it's their Achilles Heel.
Walk up to one and mention an imperfection whether or not there is actually one....it will at minimum ruin their morning...afternoon...evening....and in some cases a much longer time than one would consider reasonable.
Several years ago I saw an old list and noticed a female's name who had a high position in the company...it listed her maiden name. When I saw her I asked if her maiden name was "blank" and she looked at me and cautiously said yes. I bit my lip and said, "Oohhkayyyy!" and walked away quickly. I left it at that for several years. It was like she would fold up everytime I had contact with her....but in a friendly way. After several years we were on a business trip and I mentioned what I did and how I knew her maiden name....she was so relieved she said...she thought we might have engaged in something she would be embarrassed by that she couldn't remember. Worked out well as far as I was concerned