cut the left testicals off all male babies

User avatar
By walkingstick
11 Dec 2023 7:33 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
11 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
walkingstick
11 Dec 2023 7:33 am
User avatar
     
4,682 posts
and you have no more democrats.
User avatar
walkingstick
11 Dec 2023 7:40 am
User avatar
     
4,682 posts
or. kick a democrat in its left testicle, and it will change. every day i do this. works. every day i skip and jump down the path of life, kicking democrats in their left ball. they scream with joy. i think it is joy. they start dancing up and down holding their balls.
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Dec 2023 7:40 am
User avatar
      
24,742 posts
walkingstick » 11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: and you have no more democrats.
Why not switch one testical with one ovary of a female sibling. Everyone wishes to be the opposite gender of their birth so lets recreate the natural process into realities people give up being naturally here and build societies promising life exceeds the moment left adapting here one at a time in.

You may be projecting sarcasm but your contextual soul will do anything to make it feel really possible tomorrow..
User avatar
Skans
11 Dec 2023 7:44 am
User avatar
      
12,091 posts
walkingstick » 11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am » wrote: and you have no more democrats.
While I find that proposal of yours intriguing, it is the radical feminists who are far more responsible for Communist-Leftism than males.  Young men just want ******.  Young women have agendas.
 
User avatar
RebelGator
11 Dec 2023 7:47 am
User avatar
      
7,026 posts
Skans » 11 Dec 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: While I find that proposal of yours intriguing, it is the radical feminists who are far more responsible for Communist-Leftism than males.  Young men just want ******.  Young women have agendas.
I'm not sure any democrat has testicles.
User avatar
walkingstick
11 Dec 2023 7:50 am
User avatar
     
4,682 posts
Nostradamus'omh » 11 Dec 2023, 8:40 am » wrote: Why not switch one testical with one ovary of a female sibling. Everyone wishes to be the opposite gender of their birth so lets recreate the natural process into realities people give up being naturally here and build societies promising life exceeds the moment left adapting here one at a time in.

You may be projecting sarcasm but your contextual soul will do anything to make it feel really possible tomorrow..
"tomorrow"? there's no tomorrow there's just today. there's no today. for i am old. can't even remember the moment. "sarcasm" requires foundation or awareness? i have neither. just something. i think.
User avatar
Skans
11 Dec 2023 7:51 am
User avatar
      
12,091 posts
RebelGator » 11 Dec 2023, 8:47 am » wrote: I'm not sure any democrat has testicles.
That's a very valid point.  From "free stuff" to "gender dystopia". 
 
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Dec 2023 7:58 am
User avatar
      
24,742 posts
walkingstick » 11 Dec 2023, 8:50 am » wrote: "tomorrow"? there's no tomorrow there's just today. there's no today. for i am old. can't even remember the moment. "sarcasm" requires foundation or awareness? i have neither. just something. i think.
You playing the "Im 94 years old" **** again. Doesn't matter if you were just conceived or died 300 years ago, your time evolving was specifically you inhabiting space fixed in your own skin since conceived to dead each ancestor gets from inception of your ancestral lineage to extinction of the species your ancestral lineage was subjectively in contextually described between brains minding hypothetical scenarios living isn't self evident.

I respect the natural evolving process that limits my time evolving to be exactly my time adapting as displaced equally here. You never have been honest about living in your own skin demanding everyone else obey your objectivity to being better than anyone else alive.

I show respect for how you became you, but that stops when you keep pretending your intellectual soul is more than my sole time being alive now.
User avatar
nefarious101
11 Dec 2023 8:16 am
User avatar
      
7,047 posts
Skans » 11 Dec 2023, 8:44 am » wrote: While I find that proposal of yours intriguing, it is the radical feminists who are far more responsible for Communist-Leftism than males.  Young men just want ******.  Young women have agendas.
women are insecure with their appearance and with "what other people think' of them...it's their Achilles Heel. 

Walk up to one and mention an imperfection whether or not there is actually one....it will at minimum ruin their morning...afternoon...evening....and in some cases a much longer time than one would consider reasonable.

Several years ago I saw an old list and noticed a female's name who had a high position in the company...it listed her maiden name.  When I saw her I asked if her maiden name was "blank" and she looked at me and cautiously said yes.  I bit my lip and said, "Oohhkayyyy!" and walked away quickly.  I left it at that for several years.  It was like she would fold up everytime I had contact with her....but in a friendly way.  After several years we were on a business trip and I mentioned what I did and how I knew her maiden name....she was so relieved she said...she thought we might have engaged in something she would be embarrassed by that she couldn't remember.  Worked out well as far as I was concerned
 
Image
User avatar
Skans
11 Dec 2023 8:30 am
User avatar
      
12,091 posts
nefarious101 » 11 Dec 2023, 9:16 am » wrote: women are insecure with their appearance and with "what other people think' of them...it's their Achilles Heel. 

Walk up to one and mention an imperfection whether or not there is actually one....it will at minimum ruin their morning...afternoon...evening....and in some cases a much longer time than one would consider reasonable.

Several years ago I saw an old list and noticed a female's name who had a high position in the company...it listed her maiden name.  When I saw her I asked if her maiden name was "blank" and she looked at me and cautiously said yes.  I bit my lip and said, "Oohhkayyyy!" and walked away quickly.  I left it at that for several years.  It was like she would fold up everytime I had contact with her....but in a friendly way.  After several years we were on a business trip and I mentioned what I did and how I knew her maiden name....she was so relieved she said...she thought we might have engaged in something she would be embarrassed by that she couldn't remember.  Worked out well as far as I was concerned
Men are simply born with the propensity for confidence.  We have physical strength and testosterone which gives (most of) us courage. 

Women, on the other hand, only get a trickling of testosterone.  Their looks are their power.  If/when they lose their looks, they loose their power.  As humans we all use what we've got to our own advantage.  So, I get it, women are far more sensitive about their attractiveness.  Without it, and without a man, they are sidelined and ignored.
 
User avatar
31st Arrival
11 Dec 2023 9:24 am
User avatar
      
24,742 posts
-1
SOCK SAVINGS avatar SOCK SAVINGS -1 30 minutes a


Wow gives a reddie when not even participating in the thread. Seems my post touched your bran to resist your mind and you hold that against me for understanding your character inside out and you only project from outside in.
11 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 3492 users online :: 10 registered, 13 bots, and 3469 guests
Bots: Baiduspider, DuckDuckBot, Moblie Safari, LCC, YandexBot, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, CriteoBot, Googlebot, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search