According to the others they are not being banned. Just wanted to warn you that allow the banning of guns is not actually banning them according to some.MackTheFinger » 16 Dec 2023, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I am all for sensible gun laws but can't believe assault weapons are being ban'd.
.
IMHO...this was a political move...you can do more damage with a pistol.
.
Sunny Barger the Hells Angels president said they could fall off the face of the Earth and the crime rate wouldn't move one bit...which I tend to agree with.
.
.
I have.Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 5:16 pm » wrote: ↑ @R. Suave
you have yet to prove that statement wrong.
You lose.
Dum Dum, there is a difference between the legit term assault rifle and assault weapon.
No, there isn't.Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Dum Dum, there is a difference between the legit term assault rifle and assault weapon.
An assault rifle is a military rifle that fires an intermediate charged round, that is not particularly powerful, and generally is select fire, meaning it can fire semi auto or automatic.
assault WEAPON is a politically created term of the late 80s and made popular in the 90s by gunophobes that describes a semi auto rifle that fires an intermediate charged round, that is not particularly powerful, but is a semi auto only rifle designed for civilians.
if you like I will drive up to Salem, NH, and go to that diner you mentioned and explain this to you in simple terms.
Then it still wouldn't matter. The Ban would still be in effect.Bidencrimefamily » 16 Dec 2023, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ The old court before the trump justices would of never seen this case I believe.
Nice reframe. Not the topic of discussion, start a thread.R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑ No, there isn't.
It is what it is.
An assault weapon modified so as not to be a machine gun.
Nod.
You lost. It gunophobe nonsense.
Exactly. So no gun would be banned. But this new court is kinda weird.Skans » 16 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Then it still wouldn't matter. The Ban would still be in effect.
Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Dum Dum, there is a difference between the legit term assault rifle and assault weapon.
An assault rifle is a military rifle that fires an intermediate charged round, that is not particularly powerful, and generally is select fire, meaning it can fire semi auto or automatic.
assault WEAPON is a politically created term of the late 80s and made popular in the 90s by gunophobes that describes a semi auto rifle that fires an intermediate charged round, that is not particularly powerful, but is a semi auto only rifle designed for civilians.
if you like I will drive up to Salem, NH, and go to that diner you mentioned and explain this to you in simple terms.
sure....stop by when you circle around.if you like I will drive up to Salem, NH, and go to that diner you mentioned and explain this to you in simple terms
No, stop.Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 6:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Nice reframe. Not the topic of discussion, start a thread.
i posted the thread title SND showed my comments concerning.
lets be clear, Stubing. On line I kick your ***. In real life you know I would hurt you bad.
Do shut the **** up.
In our country you pass legislation to do that. That's the we the people thing.walkingstick » 16 Dec 2023, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ people need guns for protection of the government. people shooting people is a social issue. correct the social issues!
R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ No, stop.
The definition of the AR-15 isn't contextual, ya dumb ****.
Reframe....Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Who is talking about the AR 15? This thread is about the ban on semi automatics is IL and the term assault WEAPON that was started in the 80s to scare you gunophobes.
Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ Who is talking about the AR 15? This thread is about the ban on semi automatics is IL and the term assault WEAPON that was started in the 80s to scare you gunophobes.
which has been debunked.that was started in the 80s to scare you gunophobes.
You posted about assault Rifles. Not assault WEAPONS.R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ which has been debunked.
Here and elsewhere...repeatedly.
@R. SuaveHuey » 16 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ In the context of the gun control debate there really it isn't. It became popular around 30 years ago because they could not really call them military style assault rifles. SO they came up with a sexy name that would captivate and grab the attention of you gunophobes.
To show what the topic of discussion is. Trying to keep you focused.
But you are entirely full of ****.Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ To show what the topic of discussion is. Trying to keep you focused.
Assault weapon vs. assault rifle: What is the difference?
The terms “assault weapon” and “assault rifle” are used a lot, but when it comes to the two separate types of weapons, there is a great deal of difference.What is an assault weapon, how does it work and how is it different from an assault rifle? Here’s a quick look.
What is an “assault rifle”?An assault rifle is a rapid-fire, magazine-fed rifle designed for military use. It is a shoulder-fired weapon that allows the shooter to select between semi-automatic (requiring you pull the trigger for each shot), fully automatic (hold the trigger and the gun continuously fires) or three-shot-burst modes.
What is an "assault weapon?"Technically, there is no such thing. What’s called an assault weapon (or sometimes an assault rifle) in reports on gun violence is a semi-automatic rifle that looks similar to the assault rifles used by the military. An AR-15 rifle, like one that has been used in some mass shootings, is an example of this type of weapon.
https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/na ... 2rLn3bOGK/