Liberal Forum

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Dec 2023, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:39 pm

The photo of you posing with the shot gun tells all anyone needs to know about you....

He is a gun fondler and ammosexual.

He can’t grasp the legal definition and differences between an assault rifle and an assault weapon.

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm

He is a gun fondler and ammosexual.

He can’t grasp the legal definition and differences between an assault rifle and an assault weapon.

Huey...if you ever   added up all the time you've devoted to keeping him company.......you could have repainted the Sistine Chapel
For several years you have selflessly served as that poor guy's main connection to the outside world.

"Heinz, bitte....hand me that bangbangthingy we have no name for."

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:37 pm

40 years from when?  The 40s or the 80s?

Subtract 40 from 80...

**** idiot.
 

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm

Subtract 40 from 80...

**** idiot.

The weapon you posted was defined assault Rifle.  Meaning it is a seclect fitre weapon capable it automatic fire.




See where it says type?  It says Assault Rifle.  Now make you case.  Because this is over.
 

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:53 pm

The weapon you posted was defined assault Rifle.  Meaning it is a seclect fitre weapon capable it automatic fire.



See where it says type?  It says Assault Rifle.  Now make you case.  Because this is over.

Meaning it is a seclect fitre weapon capable it automatic fire.

so was the AR15, until it was modified so as not to be a machine gun.

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:57 pm

so was the AR15, until it was modified so as not to be a machine gun.

And by law, the congress, it was deemed an assault weapon sometime in then80s/90s.

and I already why they need a new definition.  Assault Rifle refers to a select fire weapon as you inadvertently showed.

Are you done yet?

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm

He is a gun fondler and ammosexual.

He can’t grasp the legal definition and differences between an assault rifle and an assault weapon.

Why does he bother trying to debate you on gun issues? He gets slapped around every time. 

Narcissists just never learn. 

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 12:57 pm

so was the AR15, until it was modified so as not to be a machine gun.

Every time you go against Huey about guns, you get bitch slapped. Every. Single. Time. 

Just like how bitch slap you every time you try to go against me on math issue. 

Vegas » 17 Dec 2023, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:00 pm

Why does he bother trying to debate you on gun issues? He gets slapped around every time. 

Narcissists just never learn.

Because if admits I am right his entire, false 6 year argument crashes and burns.

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm

Because if admits I am right his entire, false 6 year argument crashes and burns.

Well that is never going to happen. Narcissists would rather die before they admit they are wrong on something. 

Vegas » 17 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:02 pm

Every time you go against Huey about guns, you get bitch slapped. Every. Single. Time. 

Just like how bitch slap you every time you try to go against me on math issue.

He's always wrong, and you're an innumerate coward.

Vegas » 17 Dec 2023, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:05 pm

Well that is never going to happen. Narcissists would rather die before they admit they are wrong on something.

I have spoon fed him the facts on this thread.  And he refuses to admit it.

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:06 pm

He's always wrong, and you're an innumerate coward.

Yet, you can't prove either of this. You prefer to just get your *** kicked every time. 

Speaking of you being a coward: 
Challenge.
1. Same lie. 

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:06 pm

He's always wrong, and you're an innumerate coward.

Not always.  On this thread you lost.  

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:07 pm

I have spoon fed him the facts on this thread.  And he refuses to admit it.

Some things never change. I missed you Huey, but I didn't miss him. It's bad enough that he is a narcissist, but he is also a pedo lover. 

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:10 pm

Not always.  On this thread you lost.

You've tried to insist that ATF defines it, now it is Congress.

The weapon is defined by the purpose for which it was designed.

Period.
 

Vegas » 17 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 1:08 pm

Yet, you can't prove either of this. You prefer to just get your *** kicked every time. 

Speaking of you being a coward: 
Challenge.
1. Same lie.

Ok.

I challenge you to come up with an instance where you anticipated an outcome....and to show your reasoning.

Now run to @Huey  , he needs you.
 

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 2:14 pm

Ok.

I challenge...

You see this ^^^^. This is all I need to read to prove my point. You refuse my challenge, then lie about it, and yet your narcissistic dumb *** think you get to make challenges. 

**** that ****. 

Challenge. 
1. Same lie. 
 

Vegas » 17 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm

You see this ^^^^. This is all I need to read to prove my point. You refuse my challenge, then lie about it, and yet your narcissistic dumb *** think you get to make challenges. 

**** that ****. 

Challenge. 
1. Same lie.

I see you running....like a sniveling little hooooooooeeeey bitch...