Youre right the Supreme Court didn't banned ar15s when they let them be banned.
I don't speak gibberish.Bidencrimefamily » 14 Dec 2023, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I lean they could of not banned semiautomatic in Illinois but they chose not to but didn't ban any guns. Right redheaded strang person.
Could the Supreme Court not banned any weapon red?RedheadedStranger » 14 Dec 2023, 6:32 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't speak gibberish.
Illinois banned semiauto firearms, and the SCOTUS decided that ruling on it wasn't in their wheelhouse given the arguments presented. It's still a State issue, at this time. (See my siggy)
SCOTUS didn't ban anything.
I'm not even sure what tense your question is in, let alone gonna try to answer that stupid ****.Bidencrimefamily » 14 Dec 2023, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Could the Supreme Court not banned any weapon red?
Could they not have banned those weapons?RedheadedStranger » 14 Dec 2023, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Illinois banned semiauto firearms.
The SCOTUS chose not to intervene with State business.
The *** in **** could care less.
Next...
Bidencrimefamily » 14 Dec 2023, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Sp the Supreme Court couldn't of banned but banned. I'm getting confused here.
RedheadedStranger » 14 Dec 2023, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not even sure what tense your question is in, let alone gonna try to answer that stupid ****.
SCOTUS doesn't write laws, they interpret the Constitutionality of written law.
Yeah could they have not banned.
I swear you are dumber now than the last time you were here.Bidencrimefamily » 14 Dec 2023, 7:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah could they have not banned.![]()
![]()
![]()
Red thinks they didn't allow these guns to be banned.![]()
They're just being banned from sale not a total ban. People that already own them are good to go.Bidencrimefamily » 14 Dec 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Youre right the Supreme Court didn't banned ar15s when they let them be banned.
Sales will skyrocket.Bidencrimefamily » 15 Dec 2023, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm guessing other blue states will pass a similar law now.