Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 5:40 pm » wrote: ↑ This 10 second search result from one source...
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads ... -u-s/Which types of firearms are most commonly used in gun murders in the U.S.?In 2020, the most recent year for which the FBI has published data, handguns were involved in 59% of the 13,620 U.S. gun murders and non-negligent manslaughters for which data is available. Rifles – the category that includes guns sometimes referred to as “assault weapons” – were involved in 3% of firearm murders.
That was ghettos post. Hit the link.
Sure they are. No doubt about it. The point is the link doesn't match what he said it did. That's all.Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ So? What is your point? You can't argue that many more people are killed with hand guns. You can't post what you want done to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals. Exactly what can you prove?
The stats he posted from Pew and from Statista are both established and haven't shifted much over the last couple of decades.Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Well I just posted the link and all the information in the first link. So
Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So you are telling me the state of Illinois' definition of an an assault weapon was drafted by the NRA. That has got to be one of the dumbest **** arguments you ever posted.
You are **** stopped. What a **** moron. No wonder you got pepper sprayed. Get the **** out of here. You are not intellectually armed for this discussion.
Of course, you **** moron.So you are telling me the state of Illinois' definition of an an assault weapon was drafted by the NRA
So what are you willing to do about it.Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ So? What is your point? You can't argue that many more people are killed with hand guns. You can't post what you want done to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals. Exactly what can you prove?
Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure they are. No doubt about it. The point is the link doesn't match what he said it did. That's all.
Wait... Whut?R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course, you **** moron.
Why do you think the NRA gives them money, or threatens to take it away?
Remember when you were told to believe they should control what doctors ask their patients?
R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course, you **** moron.
Why do you think the NRA gives them money, or threatens to take it away?
Remember when you were told to believe they should control what doctors ask their patients?
Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I stand by words. Hell, I less than 30 miles from you and you declined.
Anyway, you have not done well on this thread. You really showed you are a special kinda stoopid.
why stop 30 miles short?Hell, I less than 30 miles from you and you declined.
We are getting no where fast. You're the experts.Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑ You mentioned it first.
But to esee if you have the courage of your convictions I will post ONE idea first.
1. UBCs for ALL firearm transfers. Meaning private sales as well as from FFAs. Now go google all of that and get back to me with all your ideas.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharingHuey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑ HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You are a **** a foo!
Post your link proving this.
Uber...Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't have a car, moron. I traveled by train. Duh.
You pussied out. Which is your nature. Dear old Dad knew it. Now back to the topic you have been so thoroughly curb stomped on, Pepper Spray.
Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 5:51 pm » wrote: ↑ We are getting no where fast. You're the experts.
Just say I don't care.