Liberal Forum

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:44 am

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 5:49 pm

I didn't have a car, moron.  I traveled by train.  Duh.

You pussied out. Which is your nature.  Dear old Dad knew it.  Now back to the topic you have been so thoroughly curb stomped on, Pepper Spray.

Uber...

You would be going opposite the traffic. Wouldn't have had to find, or pay for, parking.

Would have taken you 45 minutes to get here, 15 minutes to Holy Family Hospital.
 

 

You pussied out.  Because you are a ******.  You had your shot, and you said "sniffle, sniffle, snot bubble burst, it is too far, boohoo, for me to drive."  I traveled over 600 miles.  You had four days to travel less than 30 during non peak hours.  Daddy's lil ******.

R. » wrote:

29 Jan 1970, 1:44 am

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 5:47 pm

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You are a **** a foo!

Post your link proving this.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing

 

And yet, dum dum, there is a semiautomatic sports weapon ban in Illinois.  Epic fail on your part.  

You do realize your state is a constitutional carry state with some of the laxest bun laws in the nation.

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 5:57 pm

Just say you don't care.

You're the one wanting to disarm law abiding citizens so that only the criminals have the guns.

How does that make people "safer"?
 

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 5:47 pm

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You are a **** a foo!

Post your link proving this.

And look, here they are opposing sensible legislation in Alabama..

https://1819news.com/news/item/nra-come ... egislature
 

RedheadedStranger » 17 Dec 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:01 pm

You're the one wanting to disarm law abiding citizens so that only the criminals have the guns.

How does that make people "safer"?

No....at this point it is about limiting military tools to the military.

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 5:58 pm

Just say I don't care.

Ok, it is official.  You don't care about "make(ing) it harder for criminals to get guns".

Got it.  Those are your words in quotes.

You folded like a cheap suit when pressed to give your solutions.  **** off

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm

Ok, it is official.  You don't care about "make(ing) it harder for criminals to get guns".

Got it.  Those are your words in quotes.

You folded like a cheap suit when pressed to give your solutions.  **** off

Just say you value guns over American lives. Be honest. 

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:01 pm

And look, here they are opposing sensible legislation in Alabama..

https://1819news.com/news/item/nra-come ... egislature

Nice diversion.  Your claim was that the NRA wrote the definition of an assault weapons ban for Illinios that was upheld by the Supreme Court.  Why you running?

That bill does nothing to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals and addresses something that is not a real problem.

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:03 pm

Just say you value guns over American lives. Be honest.

Nope.  Lets say you have no ideas to:

make it harder for criminals to get guns

I posted my first one.  You have yet to post anything on that.  I have more.  But right now I have one more than you.

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm

No....at this point it is about limiting military tools to the military.

So, you want to ban these?



and these?

 
 The military uses both.
 

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:02 pm

No....at this point it is about limiting military tools to the military.

Actually that is already the law.  You can't buy a real assault rifle manufactured after April of 1986 without some serious money, a serious anal probe background check done by the ATF, and a tax stamp.  There are roughly 600,000 of those in circulation.

So, that is a non starter.  You can't buy a modern day assault rifle

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm

Actually that is already the law.  You can't buy a real assault rifle manufactured after April of 1986 without some serious money, a serious anal probe background check done by the ATF, and a tax stamp.  There are roughly 600,000 of those in circulation.

So, that is a non starter.  You can't buy a modern day assault rifle

Texas is at a thirty year high. 
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/10 ... ties-laws/

 

Why does Alabama have more gun deaths than new york?
https://alabamareflector.com/2023/05/30 ... -new-york/

Hey BV, you want to outlaw this:



THat is a Henry Big Boy 45 Long Colt with a 10 round fixed magazine.  I have one,.  It was designed for the military in the 1860s.  Still in production today.  You need to think before you post.

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm

Actually that is already the law.  You can't buy a real assault rifle manufactured after April of 1986 without some serious money, a serious anal probe background check done by the ATF, and a tax stamp.  There are roughly 600,000 of those in circulation.

So, that is a non starter.  You can't buy a modern day assault rifle

The AR-15 is an assault weapon modified so as not to be a machine gun.

Fruit are drawn to tactical ****.

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:13 pm

Hey BV, you want to outlaw this:



THat is a Henry Big Boy 45 Long Colt with a 10 round fixed magazine.  I have one,.  It was designed for the military in the 1860s.  Still in production today.  You need to think before you post.

@R. Suave  
 
 
 

Bidencrimefamily » 17 Dec 2023, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:11 pm

Texas is at a thirty year high. 
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/10 ... ties-laws/

Hasn't nothing to do with what I posted.  How may of those deaths are from NFA class 3 firearms?

Huey » 17 Dec 2023, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:13 pm

Hey BV, you want to outlaw this:



THat is a Henry Big Boy 45 Long Colt with a 10 round fixed magazine.  I have one,.  It was designed for the military in the 1860s.  Still in production today.  You need to think before you post.

You must realize that you're getting whipped on the facts...again.

So out come the anachronisms

 

Cities in blue states have largest decline in firearms death than red state cities.
https://www.americanprogressaction.org/ ... e-in-2023/

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 6:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:13 pm

The AR-15 is an assault weapon modified so as not to be a machine gun.

Fruit are drawn to tactical ****.

But as defined by the federal government, the state of C, NY, NJ, MA and now IL not an assault rifle.  Pease stay on topic.  

As what you call fruits are drawn to your state due to their lax gun laws.

R.Suave » 17 Dec 2023, 6:15 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2023, 6:15 pm

You must realize that you're getting whipped on the facts...again.

So out come the anachronisms

You have to present facts to whip anyone.  What facts have I been whipped with?  No ****, just these facts.