Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:07 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:07 pm

Another citation snapping its leg off in Tiny's ***...

Nope.  Not at all.  Keep up with the conversation.  Or present your case.  We were discussing wether or not the Illinois law bans all semiautomatic automatic weapons.

I have shown it does not.  If you have something to add bring it on.

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm

They're calling them "assault weapons"?

So there IS such a thing....

In the context of the gun control debate there really it isn't.  It became popular around 30 years ago because they could not really call them military style assault rifles.  SO they came up with a sexy name that would captivate and grab the attention of you gunophobes.

 

The court's action on Thursday, leaving the Illinois law in place, is not a decision on the merits of the case; as of now, there have been no conflicting decisions by lower appeals courts, and the justices may well have felt there was no need to intervene without such a conflict.

Bidencrimefamily » 14 Dec 2023, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Dec 2023, 5:32 pm

Sp the Supreme Court bans ar15 rifles. Black gun had a bad day.

Effeminately raised Twerps like you are incapable of defending yourself and your loved ones from an armed attacker anyway...so naturally this ban will make you feel less afraid to venture out into that great, big terrifying world that you are ill equipped to negotiate on your own terms.
 

Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm

In the context of the gun control debate there really it isn't.  It became popular around 30 years ago because they could not really call them military style assault rifles.  SO they came up with a sexy name that would captivate and grab the attention of you gunophobes.

In every context, Squiggly.

It was an assault weapon long before.
 

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

In every context, Squiggly.

It was an assault weapon long before.

Effeminately raised Twerps like you are incapable of defending yourself and your loved ones from an armed attacker anyway...so naturally this ban will make you feel less afraid to venture out into that great, big terrifying world that you are ill equipped to negotiate on your own terms.

GHETTOBLASTER » 16 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm

Effeminately raised Twerps like you are incapable of defending yourself and your loved ones from an armed attacker anyway...so naturally this ban will make you feel less afraid to venture out into that great, big terrifying world that you are ill equipped to negotiate on your own terms.

 

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm

Do  those yellow stripes represent  every time you've run away from a fist fight ...?
 

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm

The bought and paid for Cap Stubing stripes.  How cute, pepper spray.

Never fails to bring out the Barcalounger Commandos...

Why I am the Puppet Master

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:52 pm

Do these yellow stripes represent every time you've hidden beneath the body of a fallen comrade during a fire fight...?

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm

In every context, Squiggly.

It was an assault weapon long before.

Cool.  Not a point of discussion but if you say so.

But the truth of the matter is I am correct.  It coined in the 80s which is not long before I said it became popular.

Do some research.  Go argue with Congress on how long the term has been around.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08 ... -SD017.pdf

But on point the Illinois law does not ban all semi automatics.

Mic Drop….



 

Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm

Cool.  Not a point of discussion but if you say so.

But the truth of the matter is I am correct.  It coined in the 80s which is not long before I said it became popular.

Do some research.  Go argue with Congress on how long the term has been around.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08 ... -SD017.pdf

But on point the Illinois law does not ban all semi automatics.

Mic Drop….

No, that's ****...

It was so coined around 1943...
 

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:11 pm

No, that's ****...

It was so coined around 1943...

That’s nice.  The House site is lying.  I am sure you have a link.  

Now, back to the topic….:

Thread title:

Supreme Court uphold semiautomatic gun ban in Illinois.

Got anything on that?

Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:14 pm

That’s nice.  The House site is lying.  I am sure you have a link.  

Now, back to the topic….:

Thread title:

Supreme Court uphold semiautomatic gun ban in Illinois.

Got anything on that?

Posted repeatedly.

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm

Posted repeatedly.

Have a nice day.  Glad you agree that the law in question did not ban semiautomatic guns.

now abot that link.,

Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:24 pm

Have a nice day.  Glad you agree that the law in question did not ban semiautomatic guns.

now abot that link.,

It is one of which much has been said in many context....unless there is a new rule about reposting...

Here's another

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StG_44

Acknowledge.

Nod.
 
@Huey  

R.Suave » 16 Dec 2023, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:35 pm

It is one of which much has been said in many context....unless there is a new rule about reposting...

I’m waiting for your link.  I have seen assault rifle, but not what you claim.

if you had it you would have posted it.

 

Huey » 16 Dec 2023, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Dec 2023, 4:59 pm

I’m waiting for your link.  I have seen assault rifle, but not what you claim.

if you had it you would have posted it.

Wonder how far the supremes will let the blue states go. If it states rights then that doesnt really have any gaurd rails.