Sergei confirm hypersonicSumela » 15 Dec 2023, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Russia has developed hypersonic missiles.
WASH DC Trannies still cant do that - years behind![]()
WASH DC is focused on building a tranny-*** army wearing heels
Sergei want to fertilize your garden
NATO has lost this war. BADLY.
These missiles render US carriersSergei » 15 Dec 2023, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Sergei confirm hypersonic
Newsweek confirm hypersonic
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-su34-je ... ne-1824316
Glorious no?Sumela » 15 Dec 2023, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ NATO has lost this war. BADLY.
Russia has never been stronger.
Money and men running low for NaziUkes.
The counter offensive was a complete disaster.
Uke is a failed state.
All NATO schemes have failed....AGAIN.
Just like in Crimea and Syria.
make Pearl Harbor look like small scale.Sumela » 15 Dec 2023, 3:58 pm » wrote: ↑ These missiles render US carriers
as floating tranny coffins.
Yeah, that's back before we dropped to number 2.Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑ May be so. Prior to Desert Storm, in 1990, Iraq's Army was rated 4th in the world. DIdn't work out so well.
think this way
R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ That is one slack headline dependent jaw..
Look at the category rankings..

Are you talking about the same Trump who made member nations start coughing up their share, goldfish?maineman » 15 Dec 2023, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I certainly don't think that a nation awash in unemployment, economic recession and in the midst of a deadly global pandemic was a really great inheritance for Biden and I think he has not squandered anything. As someone who operated jointly with NATO forces for my entire career and who believes in the significance of that alliance, I am most pleased with Biden's successful efforts to reinvigorate it after four years of abuse at the hands of Trump.
Has Sergei ever visited Crimea?Sergei » 15 Dec 2023, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ think this way
Zelensky get rich
Ukarine lost
America loses again
R.Suave » 15 Dec 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ That is one slack headline dependent jaw..
Look at the category rankings..
Cannonpointer » 15 Dec 2023, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that's back before we dropped to number 2.
Big difference between numbers 1 and 4.
Not so big between 1 and 2. We can probably give the Russians a lot of trouble, being almost as militarily powerful.
But we had better fight them in a manner that does not involve much artillery. They outproduce every NATO homosexual trans country COMBINED.
So - your tranny army might be in trouble. You need to pray to whatever **** god you trans supporters worship.
You know they let their soldiers wear women's clothes and **** each other in the ***.
Cannonpointer » 15 Dec 2023, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ You know they let their soldiers wear women's clothes and **** each other in the ***.
You can't make an intelligent guess from these facts as to the relative quality of that military, compared to the one you served in?
Be honest - are you "curious"?
Yer posts are truly ignorant.Huey » 15 Dec 2023, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑ That is one talking point troll.
I don't buy these rankings. If Russia is so strong why have they defeated Ukraine yet? It should have been over in the first few months,
Bye
All these hypocritical dick sucker conjobs refuse to be honest. If we still had a military that required men to be men, and some OTHER country were letting butt **** and cross dressers cavort with their soldiers, they would be LAUGHING OUT LOUD at that military and predictng utter command failure.
Just like in Crimea and Syria.