No ****. I didn't.R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ You suggested a linear growth rate was "proportional" to an exponential one.
The Numeracy Debate is over.
You're a moron.
Run that **** on @Huey ...Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ No ****. I didn't.
What I showed is that given it's growth rate, the mass shootings were far below both linear and exponential.
QED. I win, you lose. Now it's over.
Now shut up.
Challenge
1. Same lie.
He is already numerate. You aren't.
Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ There is no need to drag me into every conversation you are involved with. You need to work on your personality and meet some people in the real world.
impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 1:41 am » wrote: ↑ The opposite would be where you view a topic ( yes, any topic not just transgenders) as having more than two diametrically opposed options.
You involved yourself in that one...Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ There is no need to drag me into every conversation you are involved with. You need to work on your personality and meet some people in the real world.
Barnacle ratio.Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ It's too late for him to work on his personality. He has been a narcissist for over 60 years. He is set in his ways.
And who in the real world would possibly want to hang with him voluntarily?
R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ You involved yourself in that one...
Then hobbled away on stumps.
Tiny,Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ I had no posts to this thread prior to you calling me out. NOthing to see here, just another BV lie.
Tiny,Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ I did, Daddy's lil ******. Since I had no post on this thread prior to you playing tag you go ahead a lie about it.
jerrab » 19 Dec 2023, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ go to some biig guy and say he is gay. after he pounds you to the ground say you meant he is happy.
impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Moving the goal posts now.. are we? Hmmm..so you can't just admit that you read into it too much? The word, Binary, has meanings and connotations, away from the trans topic. It just happens that you are obsessed with that topic and cant separate the two.
jerrab » 19 Dec 2023, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ the only time binary used these days is in conjunction with gender bender subjects just like gay now means homosexuality.
there was nothing in your post that alluded to anything other than binary gender matters. I believe I was right to question it and your rude comments have not shown I was wrong.impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah... if you want to believe that. However, in my line of work we use the word binary often and there is no trans connotation. So what is your lame brained rebuttal now... If you were half as smart as you think you are, you would move on and admit that you misinterpreted what I wrote.
jerrab » 19 Dec 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ there was nothing in your post that alluded to anything other than binary gender matters. I believe I was right to question it and your rude comments have not shown I was wrong.
You're either getting trolled or someone doesn't understand what "binary" means. Either way.........impartialobserver » 18 Dec 2023, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ You know that is not what I was talking about... but feel free to carry on. Someone in this world cares about what you say.
Answer. It's not. The devil is in the definition of "proportional". If something is proportional, it has a linear relation, or function. Exponential relationships are curves and therefore not linear. Done.R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ You suggested a linear growth rate was "proportional" to an exponential one.