Would you please explain that to @Vegas ?Skans » 19 Dec 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Answer. It's not. The devil is in the definition of "proportional". If something is proportional, it has a linear relation, or function. Exponential relationships are curves and therefore not linear. Done.
Skans » 19 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You're either getting trolled or someone doesn't understand what "binary" means. Either way.........
FWIW, when I think "binary", the last thing that I tend to think about is gender definitions. I tend to think of an old, slow, linear style of computing that may soon be displaced by quantum non-binary computing. Ternary, to be more accurate.impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ it is the latter. The other poster has a long history of being narrow minded. I thought that if I did not respond to the first time.. they would get the hint but apparently not
When cock suckers are molesting kids, Nuanced CP steps aside to avoid being murdered.impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 1:41 am » wrote: ↑ The opposite would be where you view a topic ( yes, any topic not just transgenders) as having more than two diametrically opposed options.
He can't make it out of his driveway without getting pounded.Huey » 19 Dec 2023, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ There is no need to drag me into every conversation you are involved with. You need to work on your personality and meet some people in the real world.
Why only clarify it five times?impartialobserver » 19 Dec 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Your obsession with this topic knows no bounds.. Read the posts after it and those (besides you) who responded to it.. They were able to use simple reading comprehension and discern that I was not talking about it. For the fifth time.. I clarify that I was not talking about it and yet you keep on. How many times do you need to be told... or does your obsession keep you from acknowledging this.
IT ISN'T AS SIMPLE AS THAT!Skans » 19 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You're either getting trolled or someone doesn't understand what "binary" means. Either way.........
What the **** took you so long?
He skewered you.Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ He wasn't disagreeing with me , you idiot.
God man.
Ok...let's try this again....
Assume the following conversation with a 6 year old.
Vegas: Hello Johnny Lunchbox. Let's do a math problem. Ready?
Johnny Lunchbox: Sure. As long as @R. Suave isn't teaching me.
Vegas: Don't worry. He won't. Question: If I give you 1 cookie a day for 10 days, how many cookies will you have on the 10th day.
JL: 10.
Vegas: Good!! Now if I give you an exponential amount of cookies a day for the 10 days, will you have more or less cookies than the previous problem?
JL: Obviously more.
Vegas: Now, what if you only end up with 7 cookies after the 10th day?
JL: Well...then surely I was ****. But the good news I won't have any cavities.
Yippy!!! Good job Johnny Lunchbox!
Shall we compare his critique to mine, or will you be grabbing that jar of chunky peanut butter for your Last Mile?Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑^^^ He can't even make the connection when explained at a 1st grade level.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Shall we compare his critique to mine, or will you be grabbing that jar of chunky peanut butter for your Last Mile?
Ah, the Story of the Pepper Spray.Cannonpointer » 19 Dec 2023, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ He can't make it out of his driveway without getting pounded.
He **** on his own estranged daughter's safety and dignity, he is so desperate for friends.
R.Suave » 19 Dec 2023, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Shall we compare his critique to mine, or will you be grabbing that jar of chunky peanut butter for your Last Mile?
Skans » 19 Dec 2023, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Answer. It's not. The devil is in the definition of "proportional". If something is proportional, it has a linear relation, or function. Exponential relationships are curves and therefore not linear. Done.
Don't be a **** idiot.Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ This is what I was saying to the idiot, I was trying to get across to him that even after giving him the benefit of the doubt, that if it was linear, the mass shooting rate is still far below it, let alone an exponential rate. Even after I threw him some slack, the numbers were still not on his side.
The guy is a moron.
@R. Suave
Doesn't matter what they say you're going to twist it. That's what I've notice about you these last few days. I don't even know why they talk to you.Vegas » 18 Dec 2023, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You all love to tote around how smart and educated you are. You talk about Phds and IQs and all of that ****.
Question: Since you brag about experts and think that you are smarter than you really are, then why the **** do you use a slightly autistic girl, Greta, as one of your spokespeople for climate change?
Let's do it, lying little ****...Vegas » 19 Dec 2023, 8:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop asking questions. If you have something to say, then **** say it.
God man. You and your **** control issues.
Challenge
1. Same lies
Hmmmm
Doesn't matter what they say you're going to twist it. That's what I've notice about you these last few days. I don't even know why they talk to you.