Liberal Forum

 Jaw-Dropping Letter: Jack Smith in BIG TROUBLE

The U.S. Supreme Court has an enormous job to do in the name of freedom.

On Wednesday, former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese joined law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson in submitting an amicus brief—an impartial advisory statement—to the Supreme Court.

The brief asserted that Jack Smith did not acquire his purported authority as special counsel in a legal or constitutional manner and therefore lacks standing to represent the United States in front of a federal court.

In other words, the Biden administration has again violated fundamental law in its ongoing persecution of former President Donald Trump.

On Nov. 18, 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith as special counsel to harass Trump and others over their objections to the 2020 presidential election.

On Aug. 1, the former president and leading GOP contender in the 2024 presidential race was indicted on four felony charges related to his election challenges and the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol incursion.

Last week, Smith submitted a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, asking the justices to rule on the question of presidential immunity. Could Trump be prosecuted for “crimes committed while in office”?

The word “alleged” should now appear before the phrase “special counsel” in Smith’s case because Meese and his colleagues questioned the very validity of Smith’s appointment.

Meese, who served as attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, co-authored a formidable brief.

In fact, even the framing of the question at hand highlighted the entire proceeding’s lawlessness.

“Whether private citizen Jack Smith lacks authority to represent the United States, which jurisdictional requirement must exist at all stages of litigation and which cannot be waived in filing his Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in this Court?” the question read.

According to Meese and colleagues, “private citizen Jack Smith” has no business before a federal court.

“This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it,” the brief began.

“Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution.”

The problem started when Garland “exceeded his statutory and constitutional authority by purporting to appoint Smith.”

Significantly, Meese and colleagues did not reject the validity of special counsels in general. In fact, the brief named four recent special counsels—including John Durham—who held their offices by proper appointment.

They then explained what’s different with Smith’s appointment in the brief’s most important paragraph.

“What federal statutes and the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute United States Attorney under the title ‘Special Counsel.’ That is what happened on November 18, 2022.

That appointment was unlawful, as are all the legal actions that have flowed from it, including citizen Smith’s current attempt to obtain a ruling from this Court,” the paragraph read.

Meese Amicus Brief by The Western Journal

The repetition of that French Revolution-like phrase—”citizen Smith”—hammered home the crucial point. Jack Smith has no lawful authority.

“Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor,” Meese and colleagues concluded.

“Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos,” they wrote.

Jaw-Dropping Letter: Jack Smith in BIG TROUBLE | Patriot Truth News
 

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Trump is toast and the sycophants are trying desperately to save his blubbery ***.

Squatchman » 22 Dec 2023, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:27 am

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Trump is toast and the sycophants are trying desperately to save his blubbery ***.

You are dead wrong, ****!!! Go suck some more *** dick and shut the **** up!!!

Buffalo » 22 Dec 2023, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:35 am

You are dead wrong, ****!!! Go suck some more *** dick and shut the **** up!!!

As long as things seem to be going their way, any violation is given a pass.
scrotchman is kinda stupid so maybe we should be lenient in our critique of his various droolings.

I mean, anyone who uses "hahahaha..." regularly is sort of a lesser-brained individual.
He is obviously affected by that himself so he tries to use it in his version of a verbal battle.

DeezerShoove » 22 Dec 2023, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:54 am

As long as things seem to be going their way, any violation is given a pass.
scrotchman is kinda stupid so maybe we should be lenient in our critique of his various droolings.

I mean, anyone who uses "hahahaha..." regularly is sort of a lesser-brained individual.
He is obviously affected by that himself so he tries to use it in his version of a verbal battle.

I usually just ignore his childish drivel.  I do not put posters on ignore as I think that is a coward's way out.
 

Buffalo » 22 Dec 2023, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:22 am

 Jaw-Dropping Letter: Jack Smith in BIG TROUBLE

The U.S. Supreme Court has an enormous job to do in the name of freedom.

On Wednesday, former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese joined law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson in submitting an amicus brief—an impartial advisory statement—to the Supreme Court.

The brief asserted that Jack Smith did not acquire his purported authority as special counsel in a legal or constitutional manner and therefore lacks standing to represent the United States in front of a federal court.

In other words, the Biden administration has again violated fundamental law in its ongoing persecution of former President Donald Trump.

On Nov. 18, 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith as special counsel to harass Trump and others over their objections to the 2020 presidential election.

On Aug. 1, the former president and leading GOP contender in the 2024 presidential race was indicted on four felony charges related to his election challenges and the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol incursion.

Last week, Smith submitted a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, asking the justices to rule on the question of presidential immunity. Could Trump be prosecuted for “crimes committed while in office”?

The word “alleged” should now appear before the phrase “special counsel” in Smith’s case because Meese and his colleagues questioned the very validity of Smith’s appointment.

Meese, who served as attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, co-authored a formidable brief.

In fact, even the framing of the question at hand highlighted the entire proceeding’s lawlessness.

“Whether private citizen Jack Smith lacks authority to represent the United States, which jurisdictional requirement must exist at all stages of litigation and which cannot be waived in filing his Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in this Court?” the question read.

According to Meese and colleagues, “private citizen Jack Smith” has no business before a federal court.

“This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it,” the brief began.

“Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution.”

The problem started when Garland “exceeded his statutory and constitutional authority by purporting to appoint Smith.”

Significantly, Meese and colleagues did not reject the validity of special counsels in general. In fact, the brief named four recent special counsels—including John Durham—who held their offices by proper appointment.

They then explained what’s different with Smith’s appointment in the brief’s most important paragraph.

“What federal statutes and the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute United States Attorney under the title ‘Special Counsel.’ That is what happened on November 18, 2022.

That appointment was unlawful, as are all the legal actions that have flowed from it, including citizen Smith’s current attempt to obtain a ruling from this Court,” the paragraph read.

Meese Amicus Brief by The Western Journal

The repetition of that French Revolution-like phrase—”citizen Smith”—hammered home the crucial point. Jack Smith has no lawful authority.

“Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor,” Meese and colleagues concluded.

“Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos,” they wrote.

Jaw-Dropping Letter: Jack Smith in BIG TROUBLE | Patriot Truth News

 

No....seriously....


   

DeezerShoove » 22 Dec 2023, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:54 am

As long as things seem to be going their way, any violation is given a pass.
scrotchman is kinda stupid so maybe we should be lenient in our critique of his various droolings.

I mean, anyone who uses "hahahaha..." regularly is sort of a lesser-brained individual.
He is obviously affected by that himself so he tries to use it in his version of a verbal battle.

Seriously, Coozie...

That's some funny ****.
 

Buffalo » 22 Dec 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:57 am

I usually just ignore his childish drivel.  I do not put posters on ignore as I think that is a coward's way out.

In this case all that miserable POS LOSER is looking for is an angry response.

There's nothing cowardly about refusing to give that POS LOSER  the one thing in this life that turns that POS LOSER on......which is any sort of an angry response  

Buffalo » 22 Dec 2023, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:22 am

 Jaw-Dropping Letter: Jack Smith in BIG TROUBLE

The U.S. Supreme Court has an enormous job to do in the name of freedom.

On Wednesday, former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese joined law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson in submitting an amicus brief—an impartial advisory statement—to the Supreme Court.

The brief asserted that Jack Smith did not acquire his purported authority as special counsel in a legal or constitutional manner and therefore lacks standing to represent the United States in front of a federal court.

In other words, the Biden administration has again violated fundamental law in its ongoing persecution of former President Donald Trump.

On Nov. 18, 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Smith as special counsel to harass Trump and others over their objections to the 2020 presidential election.

On Aug. 1, the former president and leading GOP contender in the 2024 presidential race was indicted on four felony charges related to his election challenges and the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol incursion.

Last week, Smith submitted a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, asking the justices to rule on the question of presidential immunity. Could Trump be prosecuted for “crimes committed while in office”?

The word “alleged” should now appear before the phrase “special counsel” in Smith’s case because Meese and his colleagues questioned the very validity of Smith’s appointment.

Meese, who served as attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, co-authored a formidable brief.

In fact, even the framing of the question at hand highlighted the entire proceeding’s lawlessness.

“Whether private citizen Jack Smith lacks authority to represent the United States, which jurisdictional requirement must exist at all stages of litigation and which cannot be waived in filing his Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in this Court?” the question read.

According to Meese and colleagues, “private citizen Jack Smith” has no business before a federal court.

“This Court should reject Mr. Smith’s request for certiorari before judgment for the simple reason that he lacks authority to ask for it,” the brief began.

“Nor does he have authority to conduct the underlying prosecution.”

The problem started when Garland “exceeded his statutory and constitutional authority by purporting to appoint Smith.”

Significantly, Meese and colleagues did not reject the validity of special counsels in general. In fact, the brief named four recent special counsels—including John Durham—who held their offices by proper appointment.

They then explained what’s different with Smith’s appointment in the brief’s most important paragraph.

“What federal statutes and the Constitution do not allow, however, is for the Attorney General to appoint a private citizen, who has never been confirmed by the Senate, as a substitute United States Attorney under the title ‘Special Counsel.’ That is what happened on November 18, 2022.

That appointment was unlawful, as are all the legal actions that have flowed from it, including citizen Smith’s current attempt to obtain a ruling from this Court,” the paragraph read.

Meese Amicus Brief by The Western Journal

The repetition of that French Revolution-like phrase—”citizen Smith”—hammered home the crucial point. Jack Smith has no lawful authority.

“Not clothed in the authority of the federal government, Smith is a modern example of the naked emperor,” Meese and colleagues concluded.

“Improperly appointed, he has no more authority to represent the United States in this Court than Bryce Harper, Taylor Swift, or Jeff Bezos,” they wrote.

Jaw-Dropping Letter: Jack Smith in BIG TROUBLE | Patriot Truth News

How far does a slack jaw have left to drop?

R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm

How far does a slack jaw have left to drop?

How low and how illegal will the dim-0-craps stoop in their obsession for power?

 

Buffalo » 22 Dec 2023, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

22 Dec 2023, 9:57 am

I usually just ignore his childish drivel.  I do not put posters on ignore as I think that is a coward's way out.

Agreed (most of the time).
Though, there are some that are just plain annoying that get the "ignore".
I never put anyone on ignore but I understand that I'm not being chased around by somebody else's ankle biter every time they post.

Of course, the "Ignored Douche Bag" believes they have intimidated somebody.
That's how stupid annoying people are. Tiresome and repetitive gets boring as ****.

That would be scrotchy most of the time.
solon and peepee would be my picks for Repetitive Club founders.