Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Jack Smith needs some sand removal from his vag
Jack Smith needs some sand removal from his vag
By FredH
22 Dec 2023 7:36 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
22 Dec 2023 7:36 pm
Ha ha ha ha
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/22/poli ... index.html
“The real question is what happens then,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “Assuming the Court of Appeals rejects Trump’s claim, will it keep the trial on hold pending further review from the Supreme Court, or will it allow the trial to go forward and force Trump to seek a stay from the Supreme Court? It’s still possible that the trial begins on March 4, but the Supreme Court’s apparent willingness to let the DC Circuit go first makes it at least somewhat – and perhaps significantly – less likely.”
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/22/poli ... index.html
“The real question is what happens then,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “Assuming the Court of Appeals rejects Trump’s claim, will it keep the trial on hold pending further review from the Supreme Court, or will it allow the trial to go forward and force Trump to seek a stay from the Supreme Court? It’s still possible that the trial begins on March 4, but the Supreme Court’s apparent willingness to let the DC Circuit go first makes it at least somewhat – and perhaps significantly – less likely.”
22 Dec 2023 7:39 pm
More Ha ha ha too funny. Jackass is hitting the berm........
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... osecution/
Smith sought a pretrial gag order against Trump that would have limited so much of the candidate’s political speech that it had to be successively narrowed by two courts. Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... osecution/
Smith sought a pretrial gag order against Trump that would have limited so much of the candidate’s political speech that it had to be successively narrowed by two courts. Now, in a filing at the Supreme Court, Smith has all but announced that his prosecutorial timeline is controlled by the 2024 general election in which Trump is likely to be a candidate.
22 Dec 2023 7:40 pm
He and Bobby Three Sticks need to hang out and compare notes.FredH » 22 Dec 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Ha ha ha ha
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/22/poli ... index.html
“The real question is what happens then,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “Assuming the Court of Appeals rejects Trump’s claim, will it keep the trial on hold pending further review from the Supreme Court, or will it allow the trial to go forward and force Trump to seek a stay from the Supreme Court? It’s still possible that the trial begins on March 4, but the Supreme Court’s apparent willingness to let the DC Circuit go first makes it at least somewhat – and perhaps significantly – less likely.”
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people
22 Dec 2023 7:45 pm
Yes Mueller's Russia hoax was different, it was both election interference and an attempted coup. Jackass Smith is so far just election interference.RedheadedStranger » 22 Dec 2023, 8:40 pm » wrote: ↑ He and Bobby Three Sticks need to hang out and compare notes.
22 Dec 2023 8:15 pm
WASH DC/CIA runs coups and regime change all over the world. Nobody cares.
Then it came home to roost.
Whats good for goose is good for the gandor.
Or....suck on it ***
Then it came home to roost.
Whats good for goose is good for the gandor.
Or....suck on it ***
22 Dec 2023 8:16 pm
There was a time when you cretins pissed and moaned about people avoiding accountability on "technicalities"...FredH » 22 Dec 2023, 8:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Ha ha ha ha
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/22/poli ... index.html
“The real question is what happens then,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “Assuming the Court of Appeals rejects Trump’s claim, will it keep the trial on hold pending further review from the Supreme Court, or will it allow the trial to go forward and force Trump to seek a stay from the Supreme Court? It’s still possible that the trial begins on March 4, but the Supreme Court’s apparent willingness to let the DC Circuit go first makes it at least somewhat – and perhaps significantly – less likely.”
But that was before you fell hard for an old fraud in a fake tan.
22 Dec 2023 8:17 pm
That's "gander", **** idiot.Sumela » 22 Dec 2023, 9:15 pm » wrote: ↑ WASH DC/CIA runs coups and regime change all over the world. Nobody cares.
Then it came home to roost.
Whats good for goose is good for the gandor.
Or....suck on it ***
22 Dec 2023 8:17 pm
I didnt fall for drone murdering ...Empire Pig BammyR.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ There was a time when you cretins pissed and moaned about people avoiding accountability on "technicalities"...
But that was before you fell hard for an old fraud in a fake tan.
22 Dec 2023 8:19 pm
How did we get there?
**** idiot
22 Dec 2023 8:21 pm
Duuuuuuuhhhhhhh, Empire.
You ever read a book Slappy?
Now turn this into a left/right retard meme....
22 Dec 2023 8:32 pm
Many...but I prefer serious fiction.Sumela » 22 Dec 2023, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Duuuuuuuhhhhhhh, Empire.
You ever read a book Slappy?
Now turn this into a left/right retard meme....
What do you recommend?
22 Dec 2023 8:36 pm
In this case what technicality is Trump getting off on? You mean the Biden DOJ dumping democracy to win an election?R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ There was a time when you cretins pissed and moaned about people avoiding accountability on "technicalities"...
But that was before you fell hard for an old fraud in a fake tan.
22 Dec 2023 8:38 pm
Biden won the last one by 7 million.FredH » 22 Dec 2023, 9:36 pm » wrote: ↑ In this case what technicality is Trump getting off on? You mean the Biden DOJ dumping democracy to win an election?
Grifty is trying to stall in order that these questions not be addressed before the election.
Duh.
22 Dec 2023 8:41 pm
Really Biden won by 7 million? Got a legitimate link for that? What actual questions?R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 9:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Biden won the last one by 7 million.
Grifty is trying to stall in order that these questions not be addressed before the election.
Duh.
22 Dec 2023 8:46 pm
It's 2023, Fred..FredH » 22 Dec 2023, 9:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Really Biden won by 7 million? Got a legitimate link for that? What actual questions?
https://www.cookpolitical.com/2020-nati ... te-tracker
22 Dec 2023 8:48 pm
This book is glorious.....for CUCKIES like you.R.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ Many...but I prefer serious fiction.
What do you recommend?
Next
22 Dec 2023 8:48 pm
So you mean the question of sketchy election practices inR.Suave » 22 Dec 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ It's 2023, Fred..
https://www.cookpolitical.com/2020-nati ... te-tracker
AZ, WI, MI and PA. Funny how that j6 riot disrupted the process to investigate that isn't it?
22 Dec 2023 8:56 pm
That's all dead end loser bs, Fred.FredH » 22 Dec 2023, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑ So you mean the question of sketchy election practices in
AZ, WI, MI and PA. Funny how that j6 riot disrupted the process to investigate that isn't it?
The 7 million is a fact.
22 Dec 2023 8:57 pm
Doesn't take much to strip away the ****.
22 Dec 2023 9:02 pm
Nawww dumb ****, its easy.....THREE Empire boys.
It just doesn't take much to cuck, cuckies like you
Who is online
In total there are 6958 users online :: 9 registered, 13 bots, and 6936 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, FJB, Beekeeper, Toddster Patriot, Huey
Bots: oBot, DuckDuckBot, NING, proximic, YandexBot, ADmantX, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, curl/7, bingbot