R.Suave » 24 Dec 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
No one cares..
Everyone knows you ammosexuals need "Tactical X"..
Except that it establishes a precedent at the federal appeals levelRedheadedStranger » 24 Dec 2023, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑ According to the CNN story the Massachusetts law that was affirmed by the Federal judge has been in place since 1998, and you guessed it... is specific to the State of Massachusetts.
That's 25 years ago if you hadn't noticed.
It also means nothing in the Free State of Tennessee.
![]()
The Massachusetts law prohibits some semiautomatic weapons and large-capacity magazines. It was passed in 1998 and was made permanent after a similar federal statute expired in 2004, according to the judge’s order.
You know how everything about the law always comes as a surprise to you?Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would anyone meltdown unless they lived in MA? IF I were to move up north I would live somewhere like Salem NH. Close to Boston, a gun range, a couple of premium gun shops and a state that has arguable the laxest gun laws in the nation.
The cool part about where I live is I can drive from her to FL, or all the way to the border of CA in NV or AZ and legally conceal carry. And we have common sense. We don't ban weapons based on appearance.
R.Suave » 24 Dec 2023, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ You know how everything about the law always comes as a surprise to you?
It's like that.
Again.
You know how everything about the law always comes as a surprise to you?
R.Suave » 24 Dec 2023, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Except that it establishes a precedent at the federal appeals level

Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't have anything tactical. Maybe from 1864.
And if no one cares why did you post this thread failure?

Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑ @GHETTO BLASTER
BV is really afraid of my Henry Big 45 LC lever action replica based on an 1860s TACTICAL design. What a ******!![]()
![]()
Tiny,Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So? The only states you have to worry about are WA, CA, IL, NY and NJ.
If I left one out my bad. Did that off the top of my head.
Next, your firearm agenda is dead in the water at the national level. 27 states (more than half, stopped) have constitutional or permit less carry. That does not include states that where you have to have a CCP to carry concealed. As I said earlier, I can go anywhere south of VA and conceal carry oral the way to the border of CA and not have to go out of my way. Do you think they are going to support bans of any kind?
There is no way amendments or BS laws will be passed at the national level with that many people supporting the right to own or carry. I know that comes as a surprise to you.
Damn, that is a lot of green and yellow. I bet you are surprised with that. Basically all yellow means is you have to be 21.
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resour ... -gun-laws/
Good luck!
Your miserable track record.Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ What are you talking about? I am quite familiar with the gun laws of other states because I travel a lot.
I know for a fact you were very surprised to learn that you can buy MA Ban Compliant Semi Auto Rifles in a town you are very familiar with.
ANd I know your state is one of the top 5-10 gun friendly states in the nation. Nothing like the Communist Commonwealth of MA.
4 indictments.Z09 » 24 Dec 2023, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Massachusetts?
Remarkable..
They once reelected a Democrat.....
As he was sitting in prison
GHETTOBLASTER » 24 Dec 2023, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑He saw a headline that looked like it might make the "ammo sexuals" as miserable as he is [which is every waking hour of every day].
Now that you've shown him that this is a Nothing Burger it's fun to watch him try to save face.
He's never learned that it is ....."Better to Remain Silent and Be Thought a Fool than to Speak and Remove All Doubt"
No rant. The MA ban has been in place for a while. Nothing new. Has no affect on my life. And you don't understand what the ban is about.R. » wrote:Tiny,Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑ So? The only states you have to worry about are WA, CA, IL, NY and NJ.
If I left one out my bad. Did that off the top of my head.
Next, your firearm agenda is dead in the water at the national level. 27 states (more than half, stopped) have constitutional or permit less carry. That does not include states that where you have to have a CCP to carry concealed. As I said earlier, I can go anywhere south of VA and conceal carry oral the way to the border of CA and not have to go out of my way. Do you think they are going to support bans of any kind?
There is no way amendments or BS laws will be passed at the national level with that many people supporting the right to own or carry. I know that comes as a surprise to you.
Damn, that is a lot of green and yellow. I bet you are surprised with that. Basically all yellow means is you have to be 21.
https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/resour ... -gun-laws/
Good luck!
That was not an invitation for you to launch into another irrelevant canned rant.
What track record would that be? Schooling you on gun laws and guns, to include your own state, gunophobe?R. » wrote:Your miserable track record.Huey » 24 Dec 2023, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑ What are you talking about? I am quite familiar with the gun laws of other states because I travel a lot.
I know for a fact you were very surprised to learn that you can buy MA Ban Compliant Semi Auto Rifles in a town you are very familiar with.
ANd I know your state is one of the top 5-10 gun friendly states in the nation. Nothing like the Communist Commonwealth of MA.
Federal appeals of State laws.R.Suave » 24 Dec 2023, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Except that it establishes a precedent at the federal appeals level
A state legislature passes an assault weapons bill....ammosexuals whine...constitutionality established..RedheadedStranger » 24 Dec 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Federal appeals of State laws.
Like I said, the affirmation was on a Massachusetts State law that has been on the books since 1998.
If a State doesn't have such a law in the first place, then there isn't anything to appeal on the Federal level to start with.
This impacted the State of Massachusetts only.
Did you even read the CNN article that you posted?R.Suave » 24 Dec 2023, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑ A state legislature passes an assault weapons bill....ammosexuals whine...constitutionality established..
Until it does, the law is constitutional and similar laws passed in the future will be legitimized by precedent.RedheadedStranger » 24 Dec 2023, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Did you even read the CNN article that you posted?
The Federal appeals ruling was on a law passed in Massachusetts 25 years ago... and yes, you can still buy semi auto rifles in Massachusetts, even after this Federal ruling.
The story also said that it was moving on up the food chain as well, and will probably end up before the SCOTUS before it's all over with.
As it pertains to State law. Individual State law.R.Suave » 24 Dec 2023, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Until it does, the law is constitutional and similar laws passed in the future will be legitimized by precedent.