Liberal Forum

According to the CBO. Then the rich said no we want more. 
 

You see I wouldn't have a problem with tax cuts if they actually cut spending ti match it. But that never happens.

But the tax cut goons said nope we will start wars and not pay for them.
 

Weird you give Clinton credit for this when he vetoed the balanced budget 3 times before Newt forced him to sign on.

golfboy » 28 Dec 2023, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2023, 7:45 pm

Weird you give Clinton credit for this when he vetoed the balanced budget 3 times before Newt forced him to sign on.

By which time he had already vaporized more than 90% of the deficit he inherited from Supply Side Idiocy, Parte Une...

R.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2023, 7:59 pm

By which time he had already vaporized more than 90% of the deficit he inherited from Supply Side Idiocy, Parte Une...

So why veto a balanced budget?   Over and over again?

golfboy » 28 Dec 2023, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2023, 8:05 pm

So why veto a balanced budget?   Over and over again?

A) they're ****

B) Republicans haven't been the solution, they're the problem

R.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 8:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2023, 8:12 pm

A) they're ****

B) Republicans haven't been the solution, they're the problem

So, no answer.   What a surprise. 
I'll bet you didn't even know about his vetoes. 

golfboy » 28 Dec 2023, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2023, 8:15 pm

So, no answer.   What a surprise. 
I'll bet you didn't even know about his vetoes.

I just told you.


Ask me how I know Republicans don't actually care about balanced budgets..

golfboy » 28 Dec 2023, 8:15 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Dec 2023, 8:15 pm

So, no answer.   What a surprise. 
I'll bet you didn't even know about his vetoes.

Why veto?

"Because they are ****."

IS an answer.