FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6by Conn Carroll, Commentary EditorR.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics ... index.html
And the beatdown goes on.
Except US law defines Insurrection for the purposes of Prosecution.GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Dec 2023, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6by Conn Carroll, Commentary Editor
August 20, 2021
.The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence”By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, according to the FBI. Reuters reports:The FBI has found scant evidence that on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials.…
"Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases," said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. "Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages."
ONLY SOME TOTALLY GULLIBLE POS QUEER WITH ZERO STREET SMARTS will buy into the false "Insurrection Narrative"
To what part of it do you object?
The FBI knows what the definition is.R.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 9:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Except US law defines Insurrection for the purposes of Prosecution.
Kind of a no-brainer.

A Colorado court concluded to the contrary...it was upheld by the state's Supreme Court in part.GHETTOBLASTER » 28 Dec 2023, 9:58 pm » wrote: ↑ The FBI knows what the definition is.
There weren't enough weapons confiscated Jan 6th to overthrow the ownership of the local rifle range
GHETTOBLASTER » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑R.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ A Colorado court concluded to the contrary...it was upheld by the state's Supreme Court in part.

MackTheFinger » 28 Dec 2023, 10:11 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought in America you had to be convicted first before any punitive action can be taken. It almost seems these headhunters are engaging in trying to fix a election by denying voter the candidate of thier choice. These people are on crack.
.
.
.R.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ It's not "punitive"...and the civil court in Colorado concluded the obvious

I guess if I was some effeminately raised ****** like you whose never even been in a fist fight..I might think that some flag poles, some cans of bear spray and some pocket knives could have overthrown the US GOVERNMENTR.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/politics ... index.html
And the beatdown goes on.
