No, not at all....write him in.Buffalo » 29 Dec 2023, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑ By disenfranchising MILLIONS of their right to vote and choose? That is not democracy, THAT is banana republic TYRANNY!!!
It is true...dim-0-crpas are doing EXACTLY what they falsely accuse republicans of...
Why you asking me about something someone you call Little Toady thinks?R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑
How do we know they are fixed?
Because the **** candidate lost by twice as much the 2nd time.
But we are left to wonder...where DOES Little Toady stands on "election fraud"?
@Huey
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
Upheld "in part."R.Suave » 28 Dec 2023, 10:10 pm » wrote: ↑ A Colorado court concluded to the contrary...it was upheld by the state's Supreme Court in part.
Answer first, Little Toady.Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ Why you asking me about something someone you call Little Toady thinks?
Precisely.R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ No conviction is required...
Read it again.
Then read it again.
Please shut the **** up, fellatrice...Cannonpointer » 29 Dec 2023, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑ Upheld "in part."
Just not the part that gets him off the ballot, princess.
In federal elections, you mean.R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 7:26 am » wrote: ↑ States are availing themselves of their rights.
MAGAts want them federalized.
Why do stupid people opine on matters they are congenitally incapable of understanding?
R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑
How do we know they are fixed?
Because the **** candidate lost by twice as much the 2nd time.
But we are left to wonder...where DOES Little Toady stands on "election fraud"?
@Huey

And the Orange Dream is on both ballots, princess.
Jacking off in public. ^R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ He was determined to be, under the standard of evidence of a CIVIL procedure....specifically "the preponderance of the evidence".
That finding was upheld.
nefarious101 » 29 Dec 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead # 1
You were here for years screaming Russia Russia Russia 100's of times a day...and you expect people to take you seriously?....you're a dickhead...**** don't work that way in the real world...stay in your lane

Which explains why you will NEVER make it back to Kansas, Dorothy.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
You are confusing him with @FOS 's holocaust denial mentor.
You would like that, fruitcake.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑ Why do stupid people opine on matters they are congenitally incapable of understanding?
You answer to whatever the **** I call you, ballgummer.Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ I don't answer to Little Toady. If you are asking for my opinion you know the answer. It is the same every other time you asked it. So ask me again, nicely, and I will tell you for the 100th time.