Liberal Forum

maineman » 29 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm

Maine can run its own elections without interference from SCOTUS, thank you very much.

You really mean without interference from the voters, right?
 

Vegas » 29 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:16 pm

No thoughts, etc...

CNN: 

Post what your sources told you....after you share your "thought"
 

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm

In this case I disagree on this particular issue but I want you to remember your words if states like Fl, LA, and TX find a legal way to keep biden off the ballot.

so... you're all for removing candidates from ballots, as long as they're democrats?

got it.

loud and clear

RebelGator » 29 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm

You really mean without interference from the voters, right?

No..because voters can write in.
 

RebelGator » 29 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:26 pm

You really mean without interference from the voters, right?

Not at all.  

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:02 pm

Nothing like it...

You see, a woman is a woman regardless of where in the US she resides.

DA KONSTATOOOOOSHUN gives individual states jurisdiction over their elections.

keep hanging on to your dick, RN...Trump hasn't been found guilty of insurrection....


 
 

maineman » 29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm

so... you're all for removing candidates from ballots, as long as they're democrats?

got it.

loud and clear

You're probably expecting a clear stand on that...
 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm

No..because voters can write in.

Weak sauce, needs something to improve the flavor.

maineman » 29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm

so... you're all for removing candidates from ballots, as long as they're democrats?

got it.

loud and clear

Not at all.  Not unless there is a felony criminal conviction.  I am telling you not to bitch about it because your words will come back to bite you in the ***. 

RebelGator » 29 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm

Weak sauce, needs something to improve the flavor.

No, that's true.

The weak sauce is that ballot eligibility is a matter of popular will.
 
 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:28 pm

No..because voters can write in.

No, write-in votes for Trump wouldn’t count in the Colorado GOP primary

https://www.verifythis.com/article/news ... aa6ddad491
 

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:34 pm

Not at all.  Not unless there is a felony criminal conviction.  I am telling you not to bitch about it because your words will come back to bite you in the ***.

You don't understand the purpose of the amendment.

A felony conviction begins with a criminal referral...Biden can't be charged with Treason by the State of Florida.
 

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm

No, write-in votes for Trump wouldn’t count in the Colorado GOP primary

https://www.verifythis.com/article/news ... aa6ddad491

Isn't that awesome?

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:38 pm

Isn't that awesome?

Right now he is on the ballot so it is a moot point.  But no, contrary to your posts, those votes won't count.

ROG62 » 29 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm

keep hanging on to your dick, RN...Trump hasn't been found guilty of insurrection....

At this point he's been found liable, regardless of your fee-fees..

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:27 pm

Post what your sources told you....after you share your "thought"

Your thoughts first. It's your **** thread. Don't be pushing your cowardice onto me. 

 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:37 pm

You don't understand the purpose of the amendment.

A felony conviction begins with a criminal referral...Biden can't be charged with Treason by the State of Florida.
 

 

Dum Dum, you don't understand the post.  I am NOT advocating for it.  All I am saying is you idiots opened up a pandora's box and when the **** bites you in the *** you have lost ALL right to bitch about it. 

Vegas » 29 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm

Your thoughts first. It's your **** thread. Don't be pushing your cowardice onto me.

No...

That bluff, too, is exhausted.
 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:42 pm

No...

That bluff, too, is exhausted.

As always, no thoughts of your own. 

He needs to turn it around so he can hide. 

Pure cowardice. 100% pure bred grade A cowardice. 

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 12:40 pm

Dum Dum, you don't understand the post.  I am NOT advocating for it.  All I am saying is you idiots opened up a pandora's box and when the **** bites you in the *** you have lost ALL right to bitch about it.

Obviously you aren't taking a stand. You are just recatapulting the idiocies you've been told by people you won't name.....because you are stupid enough to believe them.