Liberal Forum

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding OfficeNo person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.




where can the definition of insurrection or rebellion be found?

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm

You still don't get it.  If the state of Fl says biden is not upholding  this part of his oath, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” say with the migrant situation, and based on the investigation into Hunter by congress there is enough evidence uncovered to show that Biden accepted bribes, and they got there Supreme Court to say so, he is off the ballot.

Benghazi-esque  

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 2:46 pm

I offered

You accepted

I delivered

Fetch the Chunky and tie your shoes.

How long will it take you to finally figure out that your lies don't work? 

Slowest learner ever ^^^

BuckNaked » 29 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 2:57 pm

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding OfficeNo person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

where can the definition of insurrection or rebellion be found?

The discussion is available in the Colorado decision.

Also

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383



Acknowledge that you have been answered, in full.

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm

The discussion is available in the Colorado decision.

Also

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383

Acknowledge that you have been answered, in full.

what discussion.   Who decides what an insurrection or rebellion is?
 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 2:47 pm

One of us is ALWAYS wrong.

I'm consistently right...
 

 

LMAO!   

Buffalo » 29 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm

You mean the air expelling form his ***?

Isn't that the same thing???

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:15 pm

LMAO! 

Sure...


ONE example...

Go on.
 

BuckNaked » 29 Dec 2023, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:11 pm

what discussion.   Who decides what an insurrection or rebellion is?

The court.

I want explicit acknowledgments that you've been answered....as well as an answer to

How many hours per day do you spend watching FOX?


 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:20 pm

The court.

I want explicit acknowledgments that you've been answered....as well as an answer to

How many hours per day do you spend watching FOX?

0 too much free porn to watch 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:20 pm

The court.

I want explicit acknowledgments that you've been answered....as well as an answer to

How many hours per day do you spend watching FOX?

which court and where is their definition?
 
 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:18 pm

Sure...

ONE example...

Go on.

Sure.  The make up of the majority in the CO decision.

Bye.

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm

Sure.  The make up of the majority in the CO decision.

Bye.

 

You better run, bitch...

BuckNaked » 29 Dec 2023, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:22 pm

which court and where is their definition?

Beat it.

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:31 pm

 

You better run, bitch...

No need.  You lost. 

Oh, and that makes two examples.

 

Huey » 29 Dec 2023, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:34 pm

No need.  You lost. 

Oh, and that makes two examples.

No, you squealed and ran.

Bitch...


It's not a point of law.

**** loser.
 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:32 pm

Beat it.

cmon man answer please 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 3:38 pm

No, you squealed and ran.

Bitch...

It's not a point of law.

**** loser.

I didn’t run 
 
 
 

BuckNaked » 29 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 4:02 pm

cmon man answer please

0 too much free porn to watch 

R.Suave » 29 Dec 2023, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Dec 2023, 4:09 pm

0 too much free porn to watch

Who defines the words?